My thoughts on looking for the proportions of a fair d3: Can we smoothen a d6? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Looking for a probability distributionLooking for Anthony?What should be the proportions of a three sided coin?Altitude to the Hypotenuse ProportionsConfidence Interval for ProportionsProbability Question, can you confirm my thoughtsWhat proportions make a regular right prism a fair dice?A Geometric Problem: Looking for the Correct Intervalhypothesis testing for population proportionsCan a fair coin have dependent tosses?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?

Did God make two great lights or did He make the great light two?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Match Roman Numerals

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

How to delete random line from file using Unix command?

How does this infinite series simplify to an integral?

What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?

Sort list of array linked objects by keys and values

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

Semisimplicity of the category of coherent sheaves?



My thoughts on looking for the proportions of a fair d3: Can we smoothen a d6?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Looking for a probability distributionLooking for Anthony?What should be the proportions of a three sided coin?Altitude to the Hypotenuse ProportionsConfidence Interval for ProportionsProbability Question, can you confirm my thoughtsWhat proportions make a regular right prism a fair dice?A Geometric Problem: Looking for the Correct Intervalhypothesis testing for population proportionsCan a fair coin have dependent tosses?










1












$begingroup$


A year or so ago, there was a video by Matt Parker talking about a fair d3, using a cylinder. Matt and his friend then set out to make cylinders with their calculations, and then did a fairly large sample of dice throws.
The stats professor in the video said that Matt and his friend were wrong, but they did find a lower and upper bound.
When I posted this question in a similar group on other social media, it is said that creating a d3 at this point is just using a d6 then mod 3 the result.
Me being a person of results, I wish for a more satisfying conclusion to this problem.
Would it be possible to smoothen every other edge of a d6 so as to have a polyhedron with 3 curved "sides"?
I suck at draeing so I can't draw what I mean, but just imagine a cube with every other edge being a smooth continuation from one face to the other, as opposed to a hard edge.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    img02.deviantart.net/175b/i/2010/223/3/7/…
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 31 at 15:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    thingiverse.com/thing:635946
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 31 at 15:15










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to the people who sent images!
    $endgroup$
    – juventas_pollux
    Apr 1 at 3:55















1












$begingroup$


A year or so ago, there was a video by Matt Parker talking about a fair d3, using a cylinder. Matt and his friend then set out to make cylinders with their calculations, and then did a fairly large sample of dice throws.
The stats professor in the video said that Matt and his friend were wrong, but they did find a lower and upper bound.
When I posted this question in a similar group on other social media, it is said that creating a d3 at this point is just using a d6 then mod 3 the result.
Me being a person of results, I wish for a more satisfying conclusion to this problem.
Would it be possible to smoothen every other edge of a d6 so as to have a polyhedron with 3 curved "sides"?
I suck at draeing so I can't draw what I mean, but just imagine a cube with every other edge being a smooth continuation from one face to the other, as opposed to a hard edge.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    img02.deviantart.net/175b/i/2010/223/3/7/…
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 31 at 15:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    thingiverse.com/thing:635946
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 31 at 15:15










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to the people who sent images!
    $endgroup$
    – juventas_pollux
    Apr 1 at 3:55













1












1








1





$begingroup$


A year or so ago, there was a video by Matt Parker talking about a fair d3, using a cylinder. Matt and his friend then set out to make cylinders with their calculations, and then did a fairly large sample of dice throws.
The stats professor in the video said that Matt and his friend were wrong, but they did find a lower and upper bound.
When I posted this question in a similar group on other social media, it is said that creating a d3 at this point is just using a d6 then mod 3 the result.
Me being a person of results, I wish for a more satisfying conclusion to this problem.
Would it be possible to smoothen every other edge of a d6 so as to have a polyhedron with 3 curved "sides"?
I suck at draeing so I can't draw what I mean, but just imagine a cube with every other edge being a smooth continuation from one face to the other, as opposed to a hard edge.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




A year or so ago, there was a video by Matt Parker talking about a fair d3, using a cylinder. Matt and his friend then set out to make cylinders with their calculations, and then did a fairly large sample of dice throws.
The stats professor in the video said that Matt and his friend were wrong, but they did find a lower and upper bound.
When I posted this question in a similar group on other social media, it is said that creating a d3 at this point is just using a d6 then mod 3 the result.
Me being a person of results, I wish for a more satisfying conclusion to this problem.
Would it be possible to smoothen every other edge of a d6 so as to have a polyhedron with 3 curved "sides"?
I suck at draeing so I can't draw what I mean, but just imagine a cube with every other edge being a smooth continuation from one face to the other, as opposed to a hard edge.







probability geometry probability-theory probability-distributions euclidean-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 31 at 13:37









juventas_polluxjuventas_pollux

83




83







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    img02.deviantart.net/175b/i/2010/223/3/7/…
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 31 at 15:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    thingiverse.com/thing:635946
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 31 at 15:15










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to the people who sent images!
    $endgroup$
    – juventas_pollux
    Apr 1 at 3:55












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    img02.deviantart.net/175b/i/2010/223/3/7/…
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 31 at 15:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    thingiverse.com/thing:635946
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 31 at 15:15










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks to the people who sent images!
    $endgroup$
    – juventas_pollux
    Apr 1 at 3:55







1




1




$begingroup$
img02.deviantart.net/175b/i/2010/223/3/7/…
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 31 at 15:06




$begingroup$
img02.deviantart.net/175b/i/2010/223/3/7/…
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 31 at 15:06




2




2




$begingroup$
thingiverse.com/thing:635946
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 31 at 15:15




$begingroup$
thingiverse.com/thing:635946
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 31 at 15:15












$begingroup$
Thanks to the people who sent images!
$endgroup$
– juventas_pollux
Apr 1 at 3:55




$begingroup$
Thanks to the people who sent images!
$endgroup$
– juventas_pollux
Apr 1 at 3:55










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You have the right idea, but not with "every other edge". You need to round only three edges out of the 12.



Imagine looking down one body diagonal of the cube. You see three edges aimed towards you, there are three opposing hidden edges meeting at the other end of the diagonal, and the remaining six form a zig-zag band around the "middle". Select either set of three alternating edges in this band and break out your carpenter's tools. The two possible sets of three edges correspond to mirror image configurations.



From a symmetry point of view, the cube starts out with $O_h$ symmetry, having 48 point-group symmetry elements. Your modified die ends up $D_3$, with six elements. This implies you have eight choices for your modification. We just saw two of them given one body diagonal along which to view the cube. You can choose any of the four body diagonal for your vantage point, properly giving $4×2=48/6=8$ possible orientations.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169403%2fmy-thoughts-on-looking-for-the-proportions-of-a-fair-d3-can-we-smoothen-a-d6%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    You have the right idea, but not with "every other edge". You need to round only three edges out of the 12.



    Imagine looking down one body diagonal of the cube. You see three edges aimed towards you, there are three opposing hidden edges meeting at the other end of the diagonal, and the remaining six form a zig-zag band around the "middle". Select either set of three alternating edges in this band and break out your carpenter's tools. The two possible sets of three edges correspond to mirror image configurations.



    From a symmetry point of view, the cube starts out with $O_h$ symmetry, having 48 point-group symmetry elements. Your modified die ends up $D_3$, with six elements. This implies you have eight choices for your modification. We just saw two of them given one body diagonal along which to view the cube. You can choose any of the four body diagonal for your vantage point, properly giving $4×2=48/6=8$ possible orientations.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      You have the right idea, but not with "every other edge". You need to round only three edges out of the 12.



      Imagine looking down one body diagonal of the cube. You see three edges aimed towards you, there are three opposing hidden edges meeting at the other end of the diagonal, and the remaining six form a zig-zag band around the "middle". Select either set of three alternating edges in this band and break out your carpenter's tools. The two possible sets of three edges correspond to mirror image configurations.



      From a symmetry point of view, the cube starts out with $O_h$ symmetry, having 48 point-group symmetry elements. Your modified die ends up $D_3$, with six elements. This implies you have eight choices for your modification. We just saw two of them given one body diagonal along which to view the cube. You can choose any of the four body diagonal for your vantage point, properly giving $4×2=48/6=8$ possible orientations.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        You have the right idea, but not with "every other edge". You need to round only three edges out of the 12.



        Imagine looking down one body diagonal of the cube. You see three edges aimed towards you, there are three opposing hidden edges meeting at the other end of the diagonal, and the remaining six form a zig-zag band around the "middle". Select either set of three alternating edges in this band and break out your carpenter's tools. The two possible sets of three edges correspond to mirror image configurations.



        From a symmetry point of view, the cube starts out with $O_h$ symmetry, having 48 point-group symmetry elements. Your modified die ends up $D_3$, with six elements. This implies you have eight choices for your modification. We just saw two of them given one body diagonal along which to view the cube. You can choose any of the four body diagonal for your vantage point, properly giving $4×2=48/6=8$ possible orientations.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        You have the right idea, but not with "every other edge". You need to round only three edges out of the 12.



        Imagine looking down one body diagonal of the cube. You see three edges aimed towards you, there are three opposing hidden edges meeting at the other end of the diagonal, and the remaining six form a zig-zag band around the "middle". Select either set of three alternating edges in this band and break out your carpenter's tools. The two possible sets of three edges correspond to mirror image configurations.



        From a symmetry point of view, the cube starts out with $O_h$ symmetry, having 48 point-group symmetry elements. Your modified die ends up $D_3$, with six elements. This implies you have eight choices for your modification. We just saw two of them given one body diagonal along which to view the cube. You can choose any of the four body diagonal for your vantage point, properly giving $4×2=48/6=8$ possible orientations.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 31 at 16:25

























        answered Mar 31 at 13:53









        Oscar LanziOscar Lanzi

        13.6k12136




        13.6k12136



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169403%2fmy-thoughts-on-looking-for-the-proportions-of-a-fair-d3-can-we-smoothen-a-d6%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

            Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work

            Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O