Reduced word is uniquely written The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What does this linear system look like?Can all of them be different?How is $lbrace a_1, a_2, …, a_n : a_i in Bbb Z_2rbrace$ a group?Identity element of word additionBinary word addition; error patternHow to construct integer polynomial of degree $n$ which takes $n$ times the value $1$ and $n$ times the value $-1$ (in integer points)Free product has solvable word problem if its factors doA group $G$ is abelian if and only if a certain subset of the direct product is a subgroupAre these subgroups?Let $G=G_1times G_2$, prove $G'=G_1'times G_2'$
Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?
ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
Word for: a synonym with a positive connotation?
The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?
How does ice melt when immersed in water?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
University's motivation for having tenure-track positions
Can the DM override racial traits?
Wolves and sheep
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?
Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
How long does the line of fire that you can create as an action using the Investiture of Flame spell last?
rotate text in posterbox
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
How to delete random line from file using Unix command?
First use of “packing” as in carrying a gun
I could not break this equation. Please help me
Derivation tree not rendering
What are these Gizmos at Izaña Atmospheric Research Center in Spain?
Simulating Exploding Dice
Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?
Reduced word is uniquely written
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What does this linear system look like?Can all of them be different?How is $lbrace a_1, a_2, …, a_n : a_i in Bbb Z_2rbrace$ a group?Identity element of word additionBinary word addition; error patternHow to construct integer polynomial of degree $n$ which takes $n$ times the value $1$ and $n$ times the value $-1$ (in integer points)Free product has solvable word problem if its factors doA group $G$ is abelian if and only if a certain subset of the direct product is a subgroupAre these subgroups?Let $G=G_1times G_2$, prove $G'=G_1'times G_2'$
$begingroup$
Given a family of groups $G_i:iin I$ we may assume that $G_i$ are pairwise disjoint. Let $X=bigcup^_iin IG_i$ and let $1$ be one element disjoint from $X.$ A word on on $X$ is any sequence $(a_1, a_2, ...)$ such that $a_i ∈ X cup 1$ and for some $n ∈ N, a_i = 1$ for all $i ≥ n.$
A word $(a_1, a_2,...)$ is reduced if:
$(a)$ no $a_i ∈ X$ is the identity element in its group $G_i;$
$(b)$ for all $i ≥ 1, a_i$ and $a_i+1$ are not in the same group $G_i;$
$(c)$ $a_k = 1$ implies $a_i = 1$ for all $i ≥ k.$
In particular $1=(1,1,...,1)$ is reduced. Show that every reduced word can be written uniquely as $a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n=(a_1,a_2,...,a_n,1,1,...),$where $a_i in X.$
I dont even know if I understand definition, but here is my attempt:
Assume some word can't be written uniquely, so:
$a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n$=$b_1cdot b_2 cdot ... cdot b_n$
$b_1^-1cdot a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n = e_1 cdot b_2 cdot ... cdot b_n$.
$e_1$ is indentity element in $G_1$. Contradiction with $(a)$ point.
abstract-algebra group-theory formal-languages combinatorial-group-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a family of groups $G_i:iin I$ we may assume that $G_i$ are pairwise disjoint. Let $X=bigcup^_iin IG_i$ and let $1$ be one element disjoint from $X.$ A word on on $X$ is any sequence $(a_1, a_2, ...)$ such that $a_i ∈ X cup 1$ and for some $n ∈ N, a_i = 1$ for all $i ≥ n.$
A word $(a_1, a_2,...)$ is reduced if:
$(a)$ no $a_i ∈ X$ is the identity element in its group $G_i;$
$(b)$ for all $i ≥ 1, a_i$ and $a_i+1$ are not in the same group $G_i;$
$(c)$ $a_k = 1$ implies $a_i = 1$ for all $i ≥ k.$
In particular $1=(1,1,...,1)$ is reduced. Show that every reduced word can be written uniquely as $a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n=(a_1,a_2,...,a_n,1,1,...),$where $a_i in X.$
I dont even know if I understand definition, but here is my attempt:
Assume some word can't be written uniquely, so:
$a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n$=$b_1cdot b_2 cdot ... cdot b_n$
$b_1^-1cdot a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n = e_1 cdot b_2 cdot ... cdot b_n$.
$e_1$ is indentity element in $G_1$. Contradiction with $(a)$ point.
abstract-algebra group-theory formal-languages combinatorial-group-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
May you can tell us where you found this problem/definition?
$endgroup$
– Dominik
Mar 31 at 15:27
$begingroup$
@Dominik This is problem given by my professor for homework. Why you asking?
$endgroup$
– Toidi
Mar 31 at 15:30
1
$begingroup$
Firstly, your attempt does not work, because "multiplication" has not been defined on this set. This problem looks to be setting up a "normal form" for free products of groups. It also seems to be extremely simple, and not really worthy of a proof, unless I am missing something. This is because there is no concept of "equality" in the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, apart from the one inherited via their definition. That is, by their definition, two of these sequences are equal if and only if their corresponding reduced words are equal.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:13
1
$begingroup$
(In summary, the question is either missing a definition of "equality" for the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, or is elementary.)
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a family of groups $G_i:iin I$ we may assume that $G_i$ are pairwise disjoint. Let $X=bigcup^_iin IG_i$ and let $1$ be one element disjoint from $X.$ A word on on $X$ is any sequence $(a_1, a_2, ...)$ such that $a_i ∈ X cup 1$ and for some $n ∈ N, a_i = 1$ for all $i ≥ n.$
A word $(a_1, a_2,...)$ is reduced if:
$(a)$ no $a_i ∈ X$ is the identity element in its group $G_i;$
$(b)$ for all $i ≥ 1, a_i$ and $a_i+1$ are not in the same group $G_i;$
$(c)$ $a_k = 1$ implies $a_i = 1$ for all $i ≥ k.$
In particular $1=(1,1,...,1)$ is reduced. Show that every reduced word can be written uniquely as $a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n=(a_1,a_2,...,a_n,1,1,...),$where $a_i in X.$
I dont even know if I understand definition, but here is my attempt:
Assume some word can't be written uniquely, so:
$a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n$=$b_1cdot b_2 cdot ... cdot b_n$
$b_1^-1cdot a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n = e_1 cdot b_2 cdot ... cdot b_n$.
$e_1$ is indentity element in $G_1$. Contradiction with $(a)$ point.
abstract-algebra group-theory formal-languages combinatorial-group-theory
$endgroup$
Given a family of groups $G_i:iin I$ we may assume that $G_i$ are pairwise disjoint. Let $X=bigcup^_iin IG_i$ and let $1$ be one element disjoint from $X.$ A word on on $X$ is any sequence $(a_1, a_2, ...)$ such that $a_i ∈ X cup 1$ and for some $n ∈ N, a_i = 1$ for all $i ≥ n.$
A word $(a_1, a_2,...)$ is reduced if:
$(a)$ no $a_i ∈ X$ is the identity element in its group $G_i;$
$(b)$ for all $i ≥ 1, a_i$ and $a_i+1$ are not in the same group $G_i;$
$(c)$ $a_k = 1$ implies $a_i = 1$ for all $i ≥ k.$
In particular $1=(1,1,...,1)$ is reduced. Show that every reduced word can be written uniquely as $a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n=(a_1,a_2,...,a_n,1,1,...),$where $a_i in X.$
I dont even know if I understand definition, but here is my attempt:
Assume some word can't be written uniquely, so:
$a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n$=$b_1cdot b_2 cdot ... cdot b_n$
$b_1^-1cdot a_1cdot a_2 cdot ... cdot a_n = e_1 cdot b_2 cdot ... cdot b_n$.
$e_1$ is indentity element in $G_1$. Contradiction with $(a)$ point.
abstract-algebra group-theory formal-languages combinatorial-group-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory formal-languages combinatorial-group-theory
edited Apr 2 at 11:18
user1729
17.7k64294
17.7k64294
asked Mar 31 at 14:59
ToidiToidi
226
226
$begingroup$
May you can tell us where you found this problem/definition?
$endgroup$
– Dominik
Mar 31 at 15:27
$begingroup$
@Dominik This is problem given by my professor for homework. Why you asking?
$endgroup$
– Toidi
Mar 31 at 15:30
1
$begingroup$
Firstly, your attempt does not work, because "multiplication" has not been defined on this set. This problem looks to be setting up a "normal form" for free products of groups. It also seems to be extremely simple, and not really worthy of a proof, unless I am missing something. This is because there is no concept of "equality" in the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, apart from the one inherited via their definition. That is, by their definition, two of these sequences are equal if and only if their corresponding reduced words are equal.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:13
1
$begingroup$
(In summary, the question is either missing a definition of "equality" for the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, or is elementary.)
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
May you can tell us where you found this problem/definition?
$endgroup$
– Dominik
Mar 31 at 15:27
$begingroup$
@Dominik This is problem given by my professor for homework. Why you asking?
$endgroup$
– Toidi
Mar 31 at 15:30
1
$begingroup$
Firstly, your attempt does not work, because "multiplication" has not been defined on this set. This problem looks to be setting up a "normal form" for free products of groups. It also seems to be extremely simple, and not really worthy of a proof, unless I am missing something. This is because there is no concept of "equality" in the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, apart from the one inherited via their definition. That is, by their definition, two of these sequences are equal if and only if their corresponding reduced words are equal.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:13
1
$begingroup$
(In summary, the question is either missing a definition of "equality" for the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, or is elementary.)
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:14
$begingroup$
May you can tell us where you found this problem/definition?
$endgroup$
– Dominik
Mar 31 at 15:27
$begingroup$
May you can tell us where you found this problem/definition?
$endgroup$
– Dominik
Mar 31 at 15:27
$begingroup$
@Dominik This is problem given by my professor for homework. Why you asking?
$endgroup$
– Toidi
Mar 31 at 15:30
$begingroup$
@Dominik This is problem given by my professor for homework. Why you asking?
$endgroup$
– Toidi
Mar 31 at 15:30
1
1
$begingroup$
Firstly, your attempt does not work, because "multiplication" has not been defined on this set. This problem looks to be setting up a "normal form" for free products of groups. It also seems to be extremely simple, and not really worthy of a proof, unless I am missing something. This is because there is no concept of "equality" in the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, apart from the one inherited via their definition. That is, by their definition, two of these sequences are equal if and only if their corresponding reduced words are equal.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:13
$begingroup$
Firstly, your attempt does not work, because "multiplication" has not been defined on this set. This problem looks to be setting up a "normal form" for free products of groups. It also seems to be extremely simple, and not really worthy of a proof, unless I am missing something. This is because there is no concept of "equality" in the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, apart from the one inherited via their definition. That is, by their definition, two of these sequences are equal if and only if their corresponding reduced words are equal.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:13
1
1
$begingroup$
(In summary, the question is either missing a definition of "equality" for the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, or is elementary.)
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:14
$begingroup$
(In summary, the question is either missing a definition of "equality" for the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, or is elementary.)
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:14
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169484%2freduced-word-is-uniquely-written%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169484%2freduced-word-is-uniquely-written%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
May you can tell us where you found this problem/definition?
$endgroup$
– Dominik
Mar 31 at 15:27
$begingroup$
@Dominik This is problem given by my professor for homework. Why you asking?
$endgroup$
– Toidi
Mar 31 at 15:30
1
$begingroup$
Firstly, your attempt does not work, because "multiplication" has not been defined on this set. This problem looks to be setting up a "normal form" for free products of groups. It also seems to be extremely simple, and not really worthy of a proof, unless I am missing something. This is because there is no concept of "equality" in the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, apart from the one inherited via their definition. That is, by their definition, two of these sequences are equal if and only if their corresponding reduced words are equal.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:13
1
$begingroup$
(In summary, the question is either missing a definition of "equality" for the sequences $a_1cdot a_2cdotsldots cdot a_n$, or is elementary.)
$endgroup$
– user1729
Apr 2 at 11:14