How to understand fibres of morphisms of schemes. The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Separated Morphisms of SchemesCan we recover étale, fpqc etc. morphisms of schemes from the affine versions?How to understand a fibre over a generic point?Details about the definition of: “deformation of a family”Fibre of morphism of schemes.Fibres of a morphismUnderlying topological space of $X_y = X times_Y Spec hspace0.5mm k(y)$.Morphisms of global sections and Morphisms of SchemesA more elegant proof that affine morphisms of schemes are affine local on the targetBase change of cohomology for schemes and formal schemes.
How does ice melt when immersed in water?
Who or what is the being for whom Being is a question for Heidegger?
How to pronounce 1ターン?
In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?
Can a novice safely splice in wire to lengthen 5V charging cable?
Take groceries in checked luggage
Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
Why is superheterodyning better than direct conversion?
How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?
Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?
How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?
I could not break this equation. Please help me
Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?
Change bounding box of math glyphs in LuaTeX
Did God make two great lights or did He make the great light two?
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Create an outline of font
Derivation tree not rendering
How to test the equality of two Pearson correlation coefficients computed from the same sample?
First use of “packing” as in carrying a gun
How to understand fibres of morphisms of schemes.
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Separated Morphisms of SchemesCan we recover étale, fpqc etc. morphisms of schemes from the affine versions?How to understand a fibre over a generic point?Details about the definition of: “deformation of a family”Fibre of morphism of schemes.Fibres of a morphismUnderlying topological space of $X_y = X times_Y Spec hspace0.5mm k(y)$.Morphisms of global sections and Morphisms of SchemesA more elegant proof that affine morphisms of schemes are affine local on the targetBase change of cohomology for schemes and formal schemes.
$begingroup$
Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism of schemes, and let $k(y)$ to be the residue field of the point $y$. The fibre of the morphism $f$ over the point $y$ is defined to be the scheme $X_y=Xtimes Spec(k(y))$.
It's said that $X_y$ is homeomorphic to $f^-1(y)$. If we consider affine schemes, then the point $y$ corresponds to a prime ideal $p$ in $mathcalO_y$, then $f^-1(y)$ should correspond to a prime ideal $q$ in $mathcalO_x$, which is a point. But sometimes $f^-1(y)$ can be more than one point, so I am not sure what $X_y$ looks like.
Besides, it seems that if $H$ is a subscheme of $Y$, then $f^-1(H)$ can be regarded as $Xtimes H$. I hope someone can show me a clear picture. Thanks!
algebraic-geometry fibre-product
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism of schemes, and let $k(y)$ to be the residue field of the point $y$. The fibre of the morphism $f$ over the point $y$ is defined to be the scheme $X_y=Xtimes Spec(k(y))$.
It's said that $X_y$ is homeomorphic to $f^-1(y)$. If we consider affine schemes, then the point $y$ corresponds to a prime ideal $p$ in $mathcalO_y$, then $f^-1(y)$ should correspond to a prime ideal $q$ in $mathcalO_x$, which is a point. But sometimes $f^-1(y)$ can be more than one point, so I am not sure what $X_y$ looks like.
Besides, it seems that if $H$ is a subscheme of $Y$, then $f^-1(H)$ can be regarded as $Xtimes H$. I hope someone can show me a clear picture. Thanks!
algebraic-geometry fibre-product
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism of schemes, and let $k(y)$ to be the residue field of the point $y$. The fibre of the morphism $f$ over the point $y$ is defined to be the scheme $X_y=Xtimes Spec(k(y))$.
It's said that $X_y$ is homeomorphic to $f^-1(y)$. If we consider affine schemes, then the point $y$ corresponds to a prime ideal $p$ in $mathcalO_y$, then $f^-1(y)$ should correspond to a prime ideal $q$ in $mathcalO_x$, which is a point. But sometimes $f^-1(y)$ can be more than one point, so I am not sure what $X_y$ looks like.
Besides, it seems that if $H$ is a subscheme of $Y$, then $f^-1(H)$ can be regarded as $Xtimes H$. I hope someone can show me a clear picture. Thanks!
algebraic-geometry fibre-product
$endgroup$
Let $f:Xto Y$ be a morphism of schemes, and let $k(y)$ to be the residue field of the point $y$. The fibre of the morphism $f$ over the point $y$ is defined to be the scheme $X_y=Xtimes Spec(k(y))$.
It's said that $X_y$ is homeomorphic to $f^-1(y)$. If we consider affine schemes, then the point $y$ corresponds to a prime ideal $p$ in $mathcalO_y$, then $f^-1(y)$ should correspond to a prime ideal $q$ in $mathcalO_x$, which is a point. But sometimes $f^-1(y)$ can be more than one point, so I am not sure what $X_y$ looks like.
Besides, it seems that if $H$ is a subscheme of $Y$, then $f^-1(H)$ can be regarded as $Xtimes H$. I hope someone can show me a clear picture. Thanks!
algebraic-geometry fibre-product
algebraic-geometry fibre-product
edited Mar 31 at 16:38
lush
780116
780116
asked Mar 31 at 14:40
Yuyi ZhangYuyi Zhang
17117
17117
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Why should $f^-1(y)$ correspond to only one prime ideal $q$ in $X$?
In the affine case you know that $f : X = mathrmSpec B to mathrmSpec A = Y$ corresponds to a morphism of rings $varphi : A to B$.
Now for $y in Y$ one has $f^-1(y) = x in X mid varphi^-1(x) = y $ which is not necessarily just a single point.
But this is what $f^-1(y)$ looks like in the affine case (I really mean: what the underlying topological space looks like).
One can check that this set corresponds to $mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$ which has a scheme-structure as well - this is the underlying scheme-structure of $f^-1(y)$ - actually $f^-1(y) = X times_Y mathrmSpec k(y) = mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$.
Regarding your second question:
One defines $f^-1(H) := X times_Y H$ as the base change of the inclusion $i : H to Y$ along $f$.
Note that the projection $f^-1(H) to X$ is an embedding, as it is the base change of an embedding.
Maybe explicitly writing down the universal property might help you accepting this as a useful and natural definition:
Giving a morphism $Z to f^-1(H)$ is the same as giving morphisms $p : Z to X$ and $q : Z to H$ such that $f circ p = i circ q$.
That is: A morphism $p : Z to X$ factorizes over $f^-1(H)$ if and only if the composition $f circ p : Z to Y$ factorizes over the embedding $H to Y$.
Also note that this actually does the job in for example the categories of sets:
If $f : A to B$ is any map of sets and $B' subseteq B$, then $f^-1(B')$ certainly satisfies the universal property of $A times_B B'$.
If you don't want to use the universal property: $A times_B B' = (a,b') in A times B' mid f(a) = b'$, so that $f^-1(B') = p_1(Atimes_B B')$ where $p_1$ denotes the projection to the first factor.
Also the $b'$ in $(a,b')$ is no real benefit informationwise as by construction $b' = f(a)$, hence one can reconstruct b' just by knowing $a$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question is of a local nature so let's assume $X=Spec(B)$ and $Y=Spec (A)$ are affine schemes. Then $f: Spec$ $ Brightarrow Spec$ $A$ corresponds to a ring homomorphism $ g: A rightarrow B$ . Let $y$ correspond to the prime ideal $p$ in $A$ . Then $X_y= X times_ Y Spec (k(y)) = Spec ( B otimes_A frac A_ppA_p) $. Suppose $g^-1(q)=p$ where $qin Spec(B)$ Then $A rightarrow B rightarrow B_q$ factors uniquely through $A_p rightarrow B_q$ and hence we have a unique ring homomorphism from $ B otimes _A A_p/pA_p rightarrow B_q/qB_q$ which is surjective and $B_q/qB_q$ is a field Thus $exists ! zin X_y $ which is the image of the point $Spec (B_q/qB_q)$ .
Now back to geometry.
Consider the commutative diagram
$requireAMScd
beginCD
X_y@>>> Spec (k(y));\
@VVV @VVV \
X@>>> Y;
endCD
$
The maps are all continuous and follow from properties of fibre product. $pi_1(X_y) subset f^-1 (y)$ following commutativity. And the algebra above shows it is a bijection. So you have got a continuous bijection.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169457%2fhow-to-understand-fibres-of-morphisms-of-schemes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Why should $f^-1(y)$ correspond to only one prime ideal $q$ in $X$?
In the affine case you know that $f : X = mathrmSpec B to mathrmSpec A = Y$ corresponds to a morphism of rings $varphi : A to B$.
Now for $y in Y$ one has $f^-1(y) = x in X mid varphi^-1(x) = y $ which is not necessarily just a single point.
But this is what $f^-1(y)$ looks like in the affine case (I really mean: what the underlying topological space looks like).
One can check that this set corresponds to $mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$ which has a scheme-structure as well - this is the underlying scheme-structure of $f^-1(y)$ - actually $f^-1(y) = X times_Y mathrmSpec k(y) = mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$.
Regarding your second question:
One defines $f^-1(H) := X times_Y H$ as the base change of the inclusion $i : H to Y$ along $f$.
Note that the projection $f^-1(H) to X$ is an embedding, as it is the base change of an embedding.
Maybe explicitly writing down the universal property might help you accepting this as a useful and natural definition:
Giving a morphism $Z to f^-1(H)$ is the same as giving morphisms $p : Z to X$ and $q : Z to H$ such that $f circ p = i circ q$.
That is: A morphism $p : Z to X$ factorizes over $f^-1(H)$ if and only if the composition $f circ p : Z to Y$ factorizes over the embedding $H to Y$.
Also note that this actually does the job in for example the categories of sets:
If $f : A to B$ is any map of sets and $B' subseteq B$, then $f^-1(B')$ certainly satisfies the universal property of $A times_B B'$.
If you don't want to use the universal property: $A times_B B' = (a,b') in A times B' mid f(a) = b'$, so that $f^-1(B') = p_1(Atimes_B B')$ where $p_1$ denotes the projection to the first factor.
Also the $b'$ in $(a,b')$ is no real benefit informationwise as by construction $b' = f(a)$, hence one can reconstruct b' just by knowing $a$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why should $f^-1(y)$ correspond to only one prime ideal $q$ in $X$?
In the affine case you know that $f : X = mathrmSpec B to mathrmSpec A = Y$ corresponds to a morphism of rings $varphi : A to B$.
Now for $y in Y$ one has $f^-1(y) = x in X mid varphi^-1(x) = y $ which is not necessarily just a single point.
But this is what $f^-1(y)$ looks like in the affine case (I really mean: what the underlying topological space looks like).
One can check that this set corresponds to $mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$ which has a scheme-structure as well - this is the underlying scheme-structure of $f^-1(y)$ - actually $f^-1(y) = X times_Y mathrmSpec k(y) = mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$.
Regarding your second question:
One defines $f^-1(H) := X times_Y H$ as the base change of the inclusion $i : H to Y$ along $f$.
Note that the projection $f^-1(H) to X$ is an embedding, as it is the base change of an embedding.
Maybe explicitly writing down the universal property might help you accepting this as a useful and natural definition:
Giving a morphism $Z to f^-1(H)$ is the same as giving morphisms $p : Z to X$ and $q : Z to H$ such that $f circ p = i circ q$.
That is: A morphism $p : Z to X$ factorizes over $f^-1(H)$ if and only if the composition $f circ p : Z to Y$ factorizes over the embedding $H to Y$.
Also note that this actually does the job in for example the categories of sets:
If $f : A to B$ is any map of sets and $B' subseteq B$, then $f^-1(B')$ certainly satisfies the universal property of $A times_B B'$.
If you don't want to use the universal property: $A times_B B' = (a,b') in A times B' mid f(a) = b'$, so that $f^-1(B') = p_1(Atimes_B B')$ where $p_1$ denotes the projection to the first factor.
Also the $b'$ in $(a,b')$ is no real benefit informationwise as by construction $b' = f(a)$, hence one can reconstruct b' just by knowing $a$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why should $f^-1(y)$ correspond to only one prime ideal $q$ in $X$?
In the affine case you know that $f : X = mathrmSpec B to mathrmSpec A = Y$ corresponds to a morphism of rings $varphi : A to B$.
Now for $y in Y$ one has $f^-1(y) = x in X mid varphi^-1(x) = y $ which is not necessarily just a single point.
But this is what $f^-1(y)$ looks like in the affine case (I really mean: what the underlying topological space looks like).
One can check that this set corresponds to $mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$ which has a scheme-structure as well - this is the underlying scheme-structure of $f^-1(y)$ - actually $f^-1(y) = X times_Y mathrmSpec k(y) = mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$.
Regarding your second question:
One defines $f^-1(H) := X times_Y H$ as the base change of the inclusion $i : H to Y$ along $f$.
Note that the projection $f^-1(H) to X$ is an embedding, as it is the base change of an embedding.
Maybe explicitly writing down the universal property might help you accepting this as a useful and natural definition:
Giving a morphism $Z to f^-1(H)$ is the same as giving morphisms $p : Z to X$ and $q : Z to H$ such that $f circ p = i circ q$.
That is: A morphism $p : Z to X$ factorizes over $f^-1(H)$ if and only if the composition $f circ p : Z to Y$ factorizes over the embedding $H to Y$.
Also note that this actually does the job in for example the categories of sets:
If $f : A to B$ is any map of sets and $B' subseteq B$, then $f^-1(B')$ certainly satisfies the universal property of $A times_B B'$.
If you don't want to use the universal property: $A times_B B' = (a,b') in A times B' mid f(a) = b'$, so that $f^-1(B') = p_1(Atimes_B B')$ where $p_1$ denotes the projection to the first factor.
Also the $b'$ in $(a,b')$ is no real benefit informationwise as by construction $b' = f(a)$, hence one can reconstruct b' just by knowing $a$.
$endgroup$
Why should $f^-1(y)$ correspond to only one prime ideal $q$ in $X$?
In the affine case you know that $f : X = mathrmSpec B to mathrmSpec A = Y$ corresponds to a morphism of rings $varphi : A to B$.
Now for $y in Y$ one has $f^-1(y) = x in X mid varphi^-1(x) = y $ which is not necessarily just a single point.
But this is what $f^-1(y)$ looks like in the affine case (I really mean: what the underlying topological space looks like).
One can check that this set corresponds to $mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$ which has a scheme-structure as well - this is the underlying scheme-structure of $f^-1(y)$ - actually $f^-1(y) = X times_Y mathrmSpec k(y) = mathrmSpec (B otimes_A k(y))$.
Regarding your second question:
One defines $f^-1(H) := X times_Y H$ as the base change of the inclusion $i : H to Y$ along $f$.
Note that the projection $f^-1(H) to X$ is an embedding, as it is the base change of an embedding.
Maybe explicitly writing down the universal property might help you accepting this as a useful and natural definition:
Giving a morphism $Z to f^-1(H)$ is the same as giving morphisms $p : Z to X$ and $q : Z to H$ such that $f circ p = i circ q$.
That is: A morphism $p : Z to X$ factorizes over $f^-1(H)$ if and only if the composition $f circ p : Z to Y$ factorizes over the embedding $H to Y$.
Also note that this actually does the job in for example the categories of sets:
If $f : A to B$ is any map of sets and $B' subseteq B$, then $f^-1(B')$ certainly satisfies the universal property of $A times_B B'$.
If you don't want to use the universal property: $A times_B B' = (a,b') in A times B' mid f(a) = b'$, so that $f^-1(B') = p_1(Atimes_B B')$ where $p_1$ denotes the projection to the first factor.
Also the $b'$ in $(a,b')$ is no real benefit informationwise as by construction $b' = f(a)$, hence one can reconstruct b' just by knowing $a$.
edited Mar 31 at 15:27
answered Mar 31 at 15:20
lushlush
780116
780116
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question is of a local nature so let's assume $X=Spec(B)$ and $Y=Spec (A)$ are affine schemes. Then $f: Spec$ $ Brightarrow Spec$ $A$ corresponds to a ring homomorphism $ g: A rightarrow B$ . Let $y$ correspond to the prime ideal $p$ in $A$ . Then $X_y= X times_ Y Spec (k(y)) = Spec ( B otimes_A frac A_ppA_p) $. Suppose $g^-1(q)=p$ where $qin Spec(B)$ Then $A rightarrow B rightarrow B_q$ factors uniquely through $A_p rightarrow B_q$ and hence we have a unique ring homomorphism from $ B otimes _A A_p/pA_p rightarrow B_q/qB_q$ which is surjective and $B_q/qB_q$ is a field Thus $exists ! zin X_y $ which is the image of the point $Spec (B_q/qB_q)$ .
Now back to geometry.
Consider the commutative diagram
$requireAMScd
beginCD
X_y@>>> Spec (k(y));\
@VVV @VVV \
X@>>> Y;
endCD
$
The maps are all continuous and follow from properties of fibre product. $pi_1(X_y) subset f^-1 (y)$ following commutativity. And the algebra above shows it is a bijection. So you have got a continuous bijection.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question is of a local nature so let's assume $X=Spec(B)$ and $Y=Spec (A)$ are affine schemes. Then $f: Spec$ $ Brightarrow Spec$ $A$ corresponds to a ring homomorphism $ g: A rightarrow B$ . Let $y$ correspond to the prime ideal $p$ in $A$ . Then $X_y= X times_ Y Spec (k(y)) = Spec ( B otimes_A frac A_ppA_p) $. Suppose $g^-1(q)=p$ where $qin Spec(B)$ Then $A rightarrow B rightarrow B_q$ factors uniquely through $A_p rightarrow B_q$ and hence we have a unique ring homomorphism from $ B otimes _A A_p/pA_p rightarrow B_q/qB_q$ which is surjective and $B_q/qB_q$ is a field Thus $exists ! zin X_y $ which is the image of the point $Spec (B_q/qB_q)$ .
Now back to geometry.
Consider the commutative diagram
$requireAMScd
beginCD
X_y@>>> Spec (k(y));\
@VVV @VVV \
X@>>> Y;
endCD
$
The maps are all continuous and follow from properties of fibre product. $pi_1(X_y) subset f^-1 (y)$ following commutativity. And the algebra above shows it is a bijection. So you have got a continuous bijection.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The question is of a local nature so let's assume $X=Spec(B)$ and $Y=Spec (A)$ are affine schemes. Then $f: Spec$ $ Brightarrow Spec$ $A$ corresponds to a ring homomorphism $ g: A rightarrow B$ . Let $y$ correspond to the prime ideal $p$ in $A$ . Then $X_y= X times_ Y Spec (k(y)) = Spec ( B otimes_A frac A_ppA_p) $. Suppose $g^-1(q)=p$ where $qin Spec(B)$ Then $A rightarrow B rightarrow B_q$ factors uniquely through $A_p rightarrow B_q$ and hence we have a unique ring homomorphism from $ B otimes _A A_p/pA_p rightarrow B_q/qB_q$ which is surjective and $B_q/qB_q$ is a field Thus $exists ! zin X_y $ which is the image of the point $Spec (B_q/qB_q)$ .
Now back to geometry.
Consider the commutative diagram
$requireAMScd
beginCD
X_y@>>> Spec (k(y));\
@VVV @VVV \
X@>>> Y;
endCD
$
The maps are all continuous and follow from properties of fibre product. $pi_1(X_y) subset f^-1 (y)$ following commutativity. And the algebra above shows it is a bijection. So you have got a continuous bijection.
$endgroup$
The question is of a local nature so let's assume $X=Spec(B)$ and $Y=Spec (A)$ are affine schemes. Then $f: Spec$ $ Brightarrow Spec$ $A$ corresponds to a ring homomorphism $ g: A rightarrow B$ . Let $y$ correspond to the prime ideal $p$ in $A$ . Then $X_y= X times_ Y Spec (k(y)) = Spec ( B otimes_A frac A_ppA_p) $. Suppose $g^-1(q)=p$ where $qin Spec(B)$ Then $A rightarrow B rightarrow B_q$ factors uniquely through $A_p rightarrow B_q$ and hence we have a unique ring homomorphism from $ B otimes _A A_p/pA_p rightarrow B_q/qB_q$ which is surjective and $B_q/qB_q$ is a field Thus $exists ! zin X_y $ which is the image of the point $Spec (B_q/qB_q)$ .
Now back to geometry.
Consider the commutative diagram
$requireAMScd
beginCD
X_y@>>> Spec (k(y));\
@VVV @VVV \
X@>>> Y;
endCD
$
The maps are all continuous and follow from properties of fibre product. $pi_1(X_y) subset f^-1 (y)$ following commutativity. And the algebra above shows it is a bijection. So you have got a continuous bijection.
edited Mar 31 at 16:18
answered Mar 31 at 16:08
Soumik GhoshSoumik Ghosh
1,453112
1,453112
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169457%2fhow-to-understand-fibres-of-morphisms-of-schemes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown