How to think about vector fields(Non-)Conservative Vector FieldsNegative Divergence of Radial Vector Fields?Is zero vector potential for Helmholtz decomposition of curl and divergence free vector fields necessary?Generalized forms of Curl and DivergenceThe missing vector derivative operationdivergence free vector fields on non-simply connected domainsRelationship between Möbius transformations and flows/vector fieldsA vector field orthogonal to it's curl at every pointAnalog of fluid mass in electrostaticsFind geometric interpretation of differential operators in vector fields.
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?
Patience, young "Padovan"
How is this relation reflexive?
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
A function which translates a sentence to title-case
What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?
Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandoned? ( If it has actually been abandoned).
Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?
How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?
What makes Graph invariants so useful/important?
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
My colleague's body is amazing
Download, install and reboot computer at night if needed
Infinite past with a beginning?
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Can a German sentence have two subjects?
What would the Romans have called "sorcery"?
Banach space and Hilbert space topology
Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?
A Journey Through Space and Time
Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?
How to think about vector fields
(Non-)Conservative Vector FieldsNegative Divergence of Radial Vector Fields?Is zero vector potential for Helmholtz decomposition of curl and divergence free vector fields necessary?Generalized forms of Curl and DivergenceThe missing vector derivative operationdivergence free vector fields on non-simply connected domainsRelationship between Möbius transformations and flows/vector fieldsA vector field orthogonal to it's curl at every pointAnalog of fluid mass in electrostaticsFind geometric interpretation of differential operators in vector fields.
$begingroup$
How do you imagine vector fields in a "physical" way? I'm learning vector calculus, and most of the analogies break down:
If I imagine the vector field as some sort of fluid flow, then if it's incompressible then the divergence is clearly zero everywhere. But for most vector fields the divergence is not zero, and I find compressible fluids very counterintuitive.
If I imagine them as electric field of some configuration of charges, but then not all vector fields corresponds to the electric field of a configuration of charges (eg the field $f(x,y) = x hati + y hatj$), so those fields are again counterintuitive.
Which way should I think about them so that things like divergence/curl become obvious and the analogy doesn't break down for some cases?
calculus multivariable-calculus vector-analysis intuition
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
How do you imagine vector fields in a "physical" way? I'm learning vector calculus, and most of the analogies break down:
If I imagine the vector field as some sort of fluid flow, then if it's incompressible then the divergence is clearly zero everywhere. But for most vector fields the divergence is not zero, and I find compressible fluids very counterintuitive.
If I imagine them as electric field of some configuration of charges, but then not all vector fields corresponds to the electric field of a configuration of charges (eg the field $f(x,y) = x hati + y hatj$), so those fields are again counterintuitive.
Which way should I think about them so that things like divergence/curl become obvious and the analogy doesn't break down for some cases?
calculus multivariable-calculus vector-analysis intuition
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
PS: What are some good books to learnt the necessary multivariable calculus rigorously (not skipping the proof of eg Green's theorem) as quickly as possible for complex analysis background ? The first chapter of Griffiths EM contains some nice intuition but sadly totally devoid of proofs.
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 29 at 21:50
1
$begingroup$
Another book I like a lot, not nearly as rigorous, is "Div, grad, curl, and all that: an informal text on vector calculus"
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Mar 29 at 21:52
2
$begingroup$
Spivak’s “calculus on manifolds” is a masterpiece.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Mar 29 at 21:53
1
$begingroup$
So you are comfortable with two types of vector fields: divergence-free (incompressible fluids) and curl-free (potentials). Now smooth vector fields are the sum of a divergence-free part and a curl-free part, so it behaves like a fluid plus a potential.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 30 at 9:10
1
$begingroup$
@Chrystomath Isn't potential a scalar field ?
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 30 at 12:21
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
How do you imagine vector fields in a "physical" way? I'm learning vector calculus, and most of the analogies break down:
If I imagine the vector field as some sort of fluid flow, then if it's incompressible then the divergence is clearly zero everywhere. But for most vector fields the divergence is not zero, and I find compressible fluids very counterintuitive.
If I imagine them as electric field of some configuration of charges, but then not all vector fields corresponds to the electric field of a configuration of charges (eg the field $f(x,y) = x hati + y hatj$), so those fields are again counterintuitive.
Which way should I think about them so that things like divergence/curl become obvious and the analogy doesn't break down for some cases?
calculus multivariable-calculus vector-analysis intuition
$endgroup$
How do you imagine vector fields in a "physical" way? I'm learning vector calculus, and most of the analogies break down:
If I imagine the vector field as some sort of fluid flow, then if it's incompressible then the divergence is clearly zero everywhere. But for most vector fields the divergence is not zero, and I find compressible fluids very counterintuitive.
If I imagine them as electric field of some configuration of charges, but then not all vector fields corresponds to the electric field of a configuration of charges (eg the field $f(x,y) = x hati + y hatj$), so those fields are again counterintuitive.
Which way should I think about them so that things like divergence/curl become obvious and the analogy doesn't break down for some cases?
calculus multivariable-calculus vector-analysis intuition
calculus multivariable-calculus vector-analysis intuition
edited Mar 29 at 21:54
Don Thousand
4,574734
4,574734
asked Mar 29 at 21:49
Chebotarev DensityChebotarev Density
695521
695521
$begingroup$
PS: What are some good books to learnt the necessary multivariable calculus rigorously (not skipping the proof of eg Green's theorem) as quickly as possible for complex analysis background ? The first chapter of Griffiths EM contains some nice intuition but sadly totally devoid of proofs.
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 29 at 21:50
1
$begingroup$
Another book I like a lot, not nearly as rigorous, is "Div, grad, curl, and all that: an informal text on vector calculus"
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Mar 29 at 21:52
2
$begingroup$
Spivak’s “calculus on manifolds” is a masterpiece.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Mar 29 at 21:53
1
$begingroup$
So you are comfortable with two types of vector fields: divergence-free (incompressible fluids) and curl-free (potentials). Now smooth vector fields are the sum of a divergence-free part and a curl-free part, so it behaves like a fluid plus a potential.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 30 at 9:10
1
$begingroup$
@Chrystomath Isn't potential a scalar field ?
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 30 at 12:21
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
PS: What are some good books to learnt the necessary multivariable calculus rigorously (not skipping the proof of eg Green's theorem) as quickly as possible for complex analysis background ? The first chapter of Griffiths EM contains some nice intuition but sadly totally devoid of proofs.
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 29 at 21:50
1
$begingroup$
Another book I like a lot, not nearly as rigorous, is "Div, grad, curl, and all that: an informal text on vector calculus"
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Mar 29 at 21:52
2
$begingroup$
Spivak’s “calculus on manifolds” is a masterpiece.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Mar 29 at 21:53
1
$begingroup$
So you are comfortable with two types of vector fields: divergence-free (incompressible fluids) and curl-free (potentials). Now smooth vector fields are the sum of a divergence-free part and a curl-free part, so it behaves like a fluid plus a potential.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 30 at 9:10
1
$begingroup$
@Chrystomath Isn't potential a scalar field ?
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 30 at 12:21
$begingroup$
PS: What are some good books to learnt the necessary multivariable calculus rigorously (not skipping the proof of eg Green's theorem) as quickly as possible for complex analysis background ? The first chapter of Griffiths EM contains some nice intuition but sadly totally devoid of proofs.
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 29 at 21:50
$begingroup$
PS: What are some good books to learnt the necessary multivariable calculus rigorously (not skipping the proof of eg Green's theorem) as quickly as possible for complex analysis background ? The first chapter of Griffiths EM contains some nice intuition but sadly totally devoid of proofs.
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 29 at 21:50
1
1
$begingroup$
Another book I like a lot, not nearly as rigorous, is "Div, grad, curl, and all that: an informal text on vector calculus"
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Mar 29 at 21:52
$begingroup$
Another book I like a lot, not nearly as rigorous, is "Div, grad, curl, and all that: an informal text on vector calculus"
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Mar 29 at 21:52
2
2
$begingroup$
Spivak’s “calculus on manifolds” is a masterpiece.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Mar 29 at 21:53
$begingroup$
Spivak’s “calculus on manifolds” is a masterpiece.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Mar 29 at 21:53
1
1
$begingroup$
So you are comfortable with two types of vector fields: divergence-free (incompressible fluids) and curl-free (potentials). Now smooth vector fields are the sum of a divergence-free part and a curl-free part, so it behaves like a fluid plus a potential.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 30 at 9:10
$begingroup$
So you are comfortable with two types of vector fields: divergence-free (incompressible fluids) and curl-free (potentials). Now smooth vector fields are the sum of a divergence-free part and a curl-free part, so it behaves like a fluid plus a potential.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 30 at 9:10
1
1
$begingroup$
@Chrystomath Isn't potential a scalar field ?
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 30 at 12:21
$begingroup$
@Chrystomath Isn't potential a scalar field ?
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 30 at 12:21
|
show 3 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167661%2fhow-to-think-about-vector-fields%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167661%2fhow-to-think-about-vector-fields%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
PS: What are some good books to learnt the necessary multivariable calculus rigorously (not skipping the proof of eg Green's theorem) as quickly as possible for complex analysis background ? The first chapter of Griffiths EM contains some nice intuition but sadly totally devoid of proofs.
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 29 at 21:50
1
$begingroup$
Another book I like a lot, not nearly as rigorous, is "Div, grad, curl, and all that: an informal text on vector calculus"
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Mar 29 at 21:52
2
$begingroup$
Spivak’s “calculus on manifolds” is a masterpiece.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Mar 29 at 21:53
1
$begingroup$
So you are comfortable with two types of vector fields: divergence-free (incompressible fluids) and curl-free (potentials). Now smooth vector fields are the sum of a divergence-free part and a curl-free part, so it behaves like a fluid plus a potential.
$endgroup$
– Chrystomath
Mar 30 at 9:10
1
$begingroup$
@Chrystomath Isn't potential a scalar field ?
$endgroup$
– Chebotarev Density
Mar 30 at 12:21