For complex function : $f'(z)$ exists $implies$ $f$ continous in $z$?Singularity structure of function in the complex plane.Does every continuous function have a left and right derivative?Curves Bounding Complex FunctionA question regarding complex valued functionDifferentiation and continous functionsDifferences between the complex derivative and the multivariable derivative.Continuity of complex difference quotientFunction limiting its own derivative implies implies null functionIf $f$ is a complex function with constant derivativeDifferential Equations Proof for Equilibrium

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

Copenhagen passport control - US citizen

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

XeLaTeX and pdfLaTeX ignore hyphenation

Circuitry of TV splitters

A Journey Through Space and Time

Chess with symmetric move-square

I see my dog run

Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?

The magic money tree problem

Simulate Bitwise Cyclic Tag

Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

What is the white spray-pattern residue inside these Falcon Heavy nozzles?

Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?

What does "enim et" mean?

Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted



For complex function : $f'(z)$ exists $implies$ $f$ continous in $z$?


Singularity structure of function in the complex plane.Does every continuous function have a left and right derivative?Curves Bounding Complex FunctionA question regarding complex valued functionDifferentiation and continous functionsDifferences between the complex derivative and the multivariable derivative.Continuity of complex difference quotientFunction limiting its own derivative implies implies null functionIf $f$ is a complex function with constant derivativeDifferential Equations Proof for Equilibrium













2












$begingroup$


Consider a complex function $f(z): Asubsetmathbb C tomathbb C$.



If the derivative of $f$ exists then $f$ must necessarily be a continuous function?



Is the following true? $f'(z)$ exists $implies$ $f$ continuous in $z$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is true.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:06










  • $begingroup$
    To go a step further, not only is it continuous, it is analytic.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Mar 29 at 22:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can prove it directly from the definition of a derivative. Just consider $fracf(z+h)-f(z)hcdot h$ . You do it just like for the functions of real variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 29 at 22:14
















2












$begingroup$


Consider a complex function $f(z): Asubsetmathbb C tomathbb C$.



If the derivative of $f$ exists then $f$ must necessarily be a continuous function?



Is the following true? $f'(z)$ exists $implies$ $f$ continuous in $z$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is true.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:06










  • $begingroup$
    To go a step further, not only is it continuous, it is analytic.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Mar 29 at 22:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can prove it directly from the definition of a derivative. Just consider $fracf(z+h)-f(z)hcdot h$ . You do it just like for the functions of real variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 29 at 22:14














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Consider a complex function $f(z): Asubsetmathbb C tomathbb C$.



If the derivative of $f$ exists then $f$ must necessarily be a continuous function?



Is the following true? $f'(z)$ exists $implies$ $f$ continuous in $z$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Consider a complex function $f(z): Asubsetmathbb C tomathbb C$.



If the derivative of $f$ exists then $f$ must necessarily be a continuous function?



Is the following true? $f'(z)$ exists $implies$ $f$ continuous in $z$







complex-analysis functions derivatives complex-numbers continuity






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 29 at 22:11









blub

3,241829




3,241829










asked Mar 29 at 22:04









SørënSørën

1059




1059







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is true.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:06










  • $begingroup$
    To go a step further, not only is it continuous, it is analytic.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Mar 29 at 22:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can prove it directly from the definition of a derivative. Just consider $fracf(z+h)-f(z)hcdot h$ . You do it just like for the functions of real variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 29 at 22:14













  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is true.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:06










  • $begingroup$
    To go a step further, not only is it continuous, it is analytic.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Mar 29 at 22:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can prove it directly from the definition of a derivative. Just consider $fracf(z+h)-f(z)hcdot h$ . You do it just like for the functions of real variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 29 at 22:14








5




5




$begingroup$
Yes, it is true.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 29 at 22:06




$begingroup$
Yes, it is true.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 29 at 22:06












$begingroup$
To go a step further, not only is it continuous, it is analytic.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 22:13




$begingroup$
To go a step further, not only is it continuous, it is analytic.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 22:13




1




1




$begingroup$
You can prove it directly from the definition of a derivative. Just consider $fracf(z+h)-f(z)hcdot h$ . You do it just like for the functions of real variable.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 29 at 22:14





$begingroup$
You can prove it directly from the definition of a derivative. Just consider $fracf(z+h)-f(z)hcdot h$ . You do it just like for the functions of real variable.
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 29 at 22:14











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

A quick proof: Let $f:Atomathbb C$ and let $z_0in A$ be an accumulation point of $A$. Suppose $f'(z_0)$ exists, i.e. the limit



$$lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0=L$$



exists and $Linmathbb C$. Then we have



$$lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)=lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))=lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0(z-z_0)=f'(z_0)cdot 0=0$$



Thus, $lim_zto z_0f(z)=f(z_0)$ and $f$ is continuous in $z_0$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Albeit subtle, the assumption should be that the limit exists and is finite. Also, you repeated $lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))$ twice although there were missing outer parentheses in the first occurrence (perhaps this is something you intended). Lastly, the proof relies on the theorem that the limit of a product of complex functions equals the product of the limits (when both limits exist and are finite) of the complex functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:27







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MarkViola With "the limit exists" I mean that the limit is a member in the considered space, e.g. a real or complex number. Also, this is not a repetition, but the limit expression is meant to be read as any unary connective, i.e. for $lim_zto z_0f(z)=L$, the expression $lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)$ means $L-f(z_0)$. Lastly, I agree the proof relies on the properties of limits that the distribute over products and sums, if the corresponding inner limits exist.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:31










  • $begingroup$
    Why would $A$ be open though. It would suffice if $z_0$ would be an accumulation point of $A$
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 29 at 22:34











  • $begingroup$
    @Jakobian Indeed it would, out of habit I just projected my usual setting on the answer. But I'll edit that in thanks for the remark.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:35











  • $begingroup$
    I agree with the first point, but you might just consider making it explicit just to tighten things a bit. As for the second point, I had commented parenthetically that you might have intended this step.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:47











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167676%2ffor-complex-function-fz-exists-implies-f-continous-in-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

A quick proof: Let $f:Atomathbb C$ and let $z_0in A$ be an accumulation point of $A$. Suppose $f'(z_0)$ exists, i.e. the limit



$$lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0=L$$



exists and $Linmathbb C$. Then we have



$$lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)=lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))=lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0(z-z_0)=f'(z_0)cdot 0=0$$



Thus, $lim_zto z_0f(z)=f(z_0)$ and $f$ is continuous in $z_0$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Albeit subtle, the assumption should be that the limit exists and is finite. Also, you repeated $lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))$ twice although there were missing outer parentheses in the first occurrence (perhaps this is something you intended). Lastly, the proof relies on the theorem that the limit of a product of complex functions equals the product of the limits (when both limits exist and are finite) of the complex functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:27







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MarkViola With "the limit exists" I mean that the limit is a member in the considered space, e.g. a real or complex number. Also, this is not a repetition, but the limit expression is meant to be read as any unary connective, i.e. for $lim_zto z_0f(z)=L$, the expression $lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)$ means $L-f(z_0)$. Lastly, I agree the proof relies on the properties of limits that the distribute over products and sums, if the corresponding inner limits exist.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:31










  • $begingroup$
    Why would $A$ be open though. It would suffice if $z_0$ would be an accumulation point of $A$
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 29 at 22:34











  • $begingroup$
    @Jakobian Indeed it would, out of habit I just projected my usual setting on the answer. But I'll edit that in thanks for the remark.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:35











  • $begingroup$
    I agree with the first point, but you might just consider making it explicit just to tighten things a bit. As for the second point, I had commented parenthetically that you might have intended this step.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:47















5












$begingroup$

A quick proof: Let $f:Atomathbb C$ and let $z_0in A$ be an accumulation point of $A$. Suppose $f'(z_0)$ exists, i.e. the limit



$$lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0=L$$



exists and $Linmathbb C$. Then we have



$$lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)=lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))=lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0(z-z_0)=f'(z_0)cdot 0=0$$



Thus, $lim_zto z_0f(z)=f(z_0)$ and $f$ is continuous in $z_0$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Albeit subtle, the assumption should be that the limit exists and is finite. Also, you repeated $lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))$ twice although there were missing outer parentheses in the first occurrence (perhaps this is something you intended). Lastly, the proof relies on the theorem that the limit of a product of complex functions equals the product of the limits (when both limits exist and are finite) of the complex functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:27







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MarkViola With "the limit exists" I mean that the limit is a member in the considered space, e.g. a real or complex number. Also, this is not a repetition, but the limit expression is meant to be read as any unary connective, i.e. for $lim_zto z_0f(z)=L$, the expression $lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)$ means $L-f(z_0)$. Lastly, I agree the proof relies on the properties of limits that the distribute over products and sums, if the corresponding inner limits exist.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:31










  • $begingroup$
    Why would $A$ be open though. It would suffice if $z_0$ would be an accumulation point of $A$
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 29 at 22:34











  • $begingroup$
    @Jakobian Indeed it would, out of habit I just projected my usual setting on the answer. But I'll edit that in thanks for the remark.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:35











  • $begingroup$
    I agree with the first point, but you might just consider making it explicit just to tighten things a bit. As for the second point, I had commented parenthetically that you might have intended this step.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:47













5












5








5





$begingroup$

A quick proof: Let $f:Atomathbb C$ and let $z_0in A$ be an accumulation point of $A$. Suppose $f'(z_0)$ exists, i.e. the limit



$$lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0=L$$



exists and $Linmathbb C$. Then we have



$$lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)=lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))=lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0(z-z_0)=f'(z_0)cdot 0=0$$



Thus, $lim_zto z_0f(z)=f(z_0)$ and $f$ is continuous in $z_0$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



A quick proof: Let $f:Atomathbb C$ and let $z_0in A$ be an accumulation point of $A$. Suppose $f'(z_0)$ exists, i.e. the limit



$$lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0=L$$



exists and $Linmathbb C$. Then we have



$$lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)=lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))=lim_zto z_0fracf(z)-f(z_0)z-z_0(z-z_0)=f'(z_0)cdot 0=0$$



Thus, $lim_zto z_0f(z)=f(z_0)$ and $f$ is continuous in $z_0$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 29 at 22:50

























answered Mar 29 at 22:17









blubblub

3,241829




3,241829











  • $begingroup$
    Albeit subtle, the assumption should be that the limit exists and is finite. Also, you repeated $lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))$ twice although there were missing outer parentheses in the first occurrence (perhaps this is something you intended). Lastly, the proof relies on the theorem that the limit of a product of complex functions equals the product of the limits (when both limits exist and are finite) of the complex functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:27







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MarkViola With "the limit exists" I mean that the limit is a member in the considered space, e.g. a real or complex number. Also, this is not a repetition, but the limit expression is meant to be read as any unary connective, i.e. for $lim_zto z_0f(z)=L$, the expression $lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)$ means $L-f(z_0)$. Lastly, I agree the proof relies on the properties of limits that the distribute over products and sums, if the corresponding inner limits exist.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:31










  • $begingroup$
    Why would $A$ be open though. It would suffice if $z_0$ would be an accumulation point of $A$
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 29 at 22:34











  • $begingroup$
    @Jakobian Indeed it would, out of habit I just projected my usual setting on the answer. But I'll edit that in thanks for the remark.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:35











  • $begingroup$
    I agree with the first point, but you might just consider making it explicit just to tighten things a bit. As for the second point, I had commented parenthetically that you might have intended this step.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:47
















  • $begingroup$
    Albeit subtle, the assumption should be that the limit exists and is finite. Also, you repeated $lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))$ twice although there were missing outer parentheses in the first occurrence (perhaps this is something you intended). Lastly, the proof relies on the theorem that the limit of a product of complex functions equals the product of the limits (when both limits exist and are finite) of the complex functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:27







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MarkViola With "the limit exists" I mean that the limit is a member in the considered space, e.g. a real or complex number. Also, this is not a repetition, but the limit expression is meant to be read as any unary connective, i.e. for $lim_zto z_0f(z)=L$, the expression $lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)$ means $L-f(z_0)$. Lastly, I agree the proof relies on the properties of limits that the distribute over products and sums, if the corresponding inner limits exist.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:31










  • $begingroup$
    Why would $A$ be open though. It would suffice if $z_0$ would be an accumulation point of $A$
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Mar 29 at 22:34











  • $begingroup$
    @Jakobian Indeed it would, out of habit I just projected my usual setting on the answer. But I'll edit that in thanks for the remark.
    $endgroup$
    – blub
    Mar 29 at 22:35











  • $begingroup$
    I agree with the first point, but you might just consider making it explicit just to tighten things a bit. As for the second point, I had commented parenthetically that you might have intended this step.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Mar 29 at 22:47















$begingroup$
Albeit subtle, the assumption should be that the limit exists and is finite. Also, you repeated $lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))$ twice although there were missing outer parentheses in the first occurrence (perhaps this is something you intended). Lastly, the proof relies on the theorem that the limit of a product of complex functions equals the product of the limits (when both limits exist and are finite) of the complex functions.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 29 at 22:27





$begingroup$
Albeit subtle, the assumption should be that the limit exists and is finite. Also, you repeated $lim_zto z_0(f(z)-f(z_0))$ twice although there were missing outer parentheses in the first occurrence (perhaps this is something you intended). Lastly, the proof relies on the theorem that the limit of a product of complex functions equals the product of the limits (when both limits exist and are finite) of the complex functions.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 29 at 22:27





1




1




$begingroup$
@MarkViola With "the limit exists" I mean that the limit is a member in the considered space, e.g. a real or complex number. Also, this is not a repetition, but the limit expression is meant to be read as any unary connective, i.e. for $lim_zto z_0f(z)=L$, the expression $lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)$ means $L-f(z_0)$. Lastly, I agree the proof relies on the properties of limits that the distribute over products and sums, if the corresponding inner limits exist.
$endgroup$
– blub
Mar 29 at 22:31




$begingroup$
@MarkViola With "the limit exists" I mean that the limit is a member in the considered space, e.g. a real or complex number. Also, this is not a repetition, but the limit expression is meant to be read as any unary connective, i.e. for $lim_zto z_0f(z)=L$, the expression $lim_zto z_0f(z)-f(z_0)$ means $L-f(z_0)$. Lastly, I agree the proof relies on the properties of limits that the distribute over products and sums, if the corresponding inner limits exist.
$endgroup$
– blub
Mar 29 at 22:31












$begingroup$
Why would $A$ be open though. It would suffice if $z_0$ would be an accumulation point of $A$
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 29 at 22:34





$begingroup$
Why would $A$ be open though. It would suffice if $z_0$ would be an accumulation point of $A$
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Mar 29 at 22:34













$begingroup$
@Jakobian Indeed it would, out of habit I just projected my usual setting on the answer. But I'll edit that in thanks for the remark.
$endgroup$
– blub
Mar 29 at 22:35





$begingroup$
@Jakobian Indeed it would, out of habit I just projected my usual setting on the answer. But I'll edit that in thanks for the remark.
$endgroup$
– blub
Mar 29 at 22:35













$begingroup$
I agree with the first point, but you might just consider making it explicit just to tighten things a bit. As for the second point, I had commented parenthetically that you might have intended this step.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 29 at 22:47




$begingroup$
I agree with the first point, but you might just consider making it explicit just to tighten things a bit. As for the second point, I had commented parenthetically that you might have intended this step.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Mar 29 at 22:47

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167676%2ffor-complex-function-fz-exists-implies-f-continous-in-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ