Elliptic regularity for $-nabla cdot(a(x)nabla u)$ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Elliptic Regularity for solutions in distributional senseNeed source for elliptic regularity on unbounded domainsRegularity of compactly supported solutions to the divergence equation: $nablacdot mathbfv=g$.Elliptic regularityLaplacian as a Fredholm operatorBoundedness of derivatives of solutions of elliptic differential equationsElliptic regularity at boundaryProve that $a(u,v)=int_Omega Anabla ucdot nabla v$ is continuous if $A$ uniformly elliptic.Best regularity for elliptic PDE with Neumann dataElliptic Regularity on Convex Domain
Is this Kuo-toa homebrew race balanced?
Can haste grant me and my beast master companion extra attacks?
Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?
What did Turing mean when saying that "machines cannot give rise to surprises" is due to a fallacy?
Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?
Releasing Patch File for BSD3 Licensed Project
Twin's vs. Twins'
NIntegrate on a solution of a matrix ODE
Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose landing?
Find general formula for the terms
How to make triangles with rounded sides and corners? (squircle with 3 sides)
Is the time—manner—place ordering of adverbials an oversimplification?
.bashrc alias for a command with fixed second parameter
Statistical analysis applied to methods coming out of Machine Learning
How does the body cool itself in a stillsuit?
Did pre-Columbian Americans know the spherical shape of the Earth?
Problem with display of presentation
First paper to introduce the "principal-agent problem"
How to evaluate this function?
Centre cell vertically in tabularx
How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?
When does a function NOT have an antiderivative?
systemd and copy (/bin/cp): no such file or directory
Short story about astronauts fertilizing soil with their own bodies
Elliptic regularity for $-nabla cdot(a(x)nabla u)$
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Elliptic Regularity for solutions in distributional senseNeed source for elliptic regularity on unbounded domainsRegularity of compactly supported solutions to the divergence equation: $nablacdot mathbfv=g$.Elliptic regularityLaplacian as a Fredholm operatorBoundedness of derivatives of solutions of elliptic differential equationsElliptic regularity at boundaryProve that $a(u,v)=int_Omega Anabla ucdot nabla v$ is continuous if $A$ uniformly elliptic.Best regularity for elliptic PDE with Neumann dataElliptic Regularity on Convex Domain
$begingroup$
Define $Du= -nabla cdot (a(x)nabla u)$ where $a$ is a smooth function which is away from $0$ and bounded.
Suppose I have $u in H^1(Omega)$ on a smooth bounded domain and I also know that $Du in L^2(Omega)$.
Does this imply that $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$ and $u in H^2(Omega)$?
For the Laplacian case: we get immediately that the Laplacian is in $L^2$ and then elliptic regularity theory gives $H^2$ for $u$. But this case, I don't know????
functional-analysis pde regularity-theory-of-pdes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Define $Du= -nabla cdot (a(x)nabla u)$ where $a$ is a smooth function which is away from $0$ and bounded.
Suppose I have $u in H^1(Omega)$ on a smooth bounded domain and I also know that $Du in L^2(Omega)$.
Does this imply that $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$ and $u in H^2(Omega)$?
For the Laplacian case: we get immediately that the Laplacian is in $L^2$ and then elliptic regularity theory gives $H^2$ for $u$. But this case, I don't know????
functional-analysis pde regularity-theory-of-pdes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Define $Du= -nabla cdot (a(x)nabla u)$ where $a$ is a smooth function which is away from $0$ and bounded.
Suppose I have $u in H^1(Omega)$ on a smooth bounded domain and I also know that $Du in L^2(Omega)$.
Does this imply that $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$ and $u in H^2(Omega)$?
For the Laplacian case: we get immediately that the Laplacian is in $L^2$ and then elliptic regularity theory gives $H^2$ for $u$. But this case, I don't know????
functional-analysis pde regularity-theory-of-pdes
$endgroup$
Define $Du= -nabla cdot (a(x)nabla u)$ where $a$ is a smooth function which is away from $0$ and bounded.
Suppose I have $u in H^1(Omega)$ on a smooth bounded domain and I also know that $Du in L^2(Omega)$.
Does this imply that $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$ and $u in H^2(Omega)$?
For the Laplacian case: we get immediately that the Laplacian is in $L^2$ and then elliptic regularity theory gives $H^2$ for $u$. But this case, I don't know????
functional-analysis pde regularity-theory-of-pdes
functional-analysis pde regularity-theory-of-pdes
asked Apr 2 at 14:52
StopUsingFacebookStopUsingFacebook
31718
31718
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
$$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
Rearranging yields
$$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171948%2felliptic-regularity-for-nabla-cdotax-nabla-u%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
$$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
Rearranging yields
$$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
$$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
Rearranging yields
$$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
$$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
Rearranging yields
$$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.
$endgroup$
If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
$$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
Rearranging yields
$$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
$$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.
answered Apr 3 at 15:57
StrantsStrants
5,89921736
5,89921736
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171948%2felliptic-regularity-for-nabla-cdotax-nabla-u%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown