Elliptic regularity for $-nabla cdot(a(x)nabla u)$ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Elliptic Regularity for solutions in distributional senseNeed source for elliptic regularity on unbounded domainsRegularity of compactly supported solutions to the divergence equation: $nablacdot mathbfv=g$.Elliptic regularityLaplacian as a Fredholm operatorBoundedness of derivatives of solutions of elliptic differential equationsElliptic regularity at boundaryProve that $a(u,v)=int_Omega Anabla ucdot nabla v$ is continuous if $A$ uniformly elliptic.Best regularity for elliptic PDE with Neumann dataElliptic Regularity on Convex Domain

Is this Kuo-toa homebrew race balanced?

Can haste grant me and my beast master companion extra attacks?

Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?

What did Turing mean when saying that "machines cannot give rise to surprises" is due to a fallacy?

Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?

Releasing Patch File for BSD3 Licensed Project

Twin's vs. Twins'

NIntegrate on a solution of a matrix ODE

Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose landing?

Find general formula for the terms

How to make triangles with rounded sides and corners? (squircle with 3 sides)

Is the time—manner—place ordering of adverbials an oversimplification?

.bashrc alias for a command with fixed second parameter

Statistical analysis applied to methods coming out of Machine Learning

How does the body cool itself in a stillsuit?

Did pre-Columbian Americans know the spherical shape of the Earth?

Problem with display of presentation

First paper to introduce the "principal-agent problem"

How to evaluate this function?

Centre cell vertically in tabularx

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

When does a function NOT have an antiderivative?

systemd and copy (/bin/cp): no such file or directory

Short story about astronauts fertilizing soil with their own bodies



Elliptic regularity for $-nabla cdot(a(x)nabla u)$



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Elliptic Regularity for solutions in distributional senseNeed source for elliptic regularity on unbounded domainsRegularity of compactly supported solutions to the divergence equation: $nablacdot mathbfv=g$.Elliptic regularityLaplacian as a Fredholm operatorBoundedness of derivatives of solutions of elliptic differential equationsElliptic regularity at boundaryProve that $a(u,v)=int_Omega Anabla ucdot nabla v$ is continuous if $A$ uniformly elliptic.Best regularity for elliptic PDE with Neumann dataElliptic Regularity on Convex Domain










1












$begingroup$


Define $Du= -nabla cdot (a(x)nabla u)$ where $a$ is a smooth function which is away from $0$ and bounded.



Suppose I have $u in H^1(Omega)$ on a smooth bounded domain and I also know that $Du in L^2(Omega)$.



Does this imply that $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$ and $u in H^2(Omega)$?



For the Laplacian case: we get immediately that the Laplacian is in $L^2$ and then elliptic regularity theory gives $H^2$ for $u$. But this case, I don't know????










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Define $Du= -nabla cdot (a(x)nabla u)$ where $a$ is a smooth function which is away from $0$ and bounded.



    Suppose I have $u in H^1(Omega)$ on a smooth bounded domain and I also know that $Du in L^2(Omega)$.



    Does this imply that $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$ and $u in H^2(Omega)$?



    For the Laplacian case: we get immediately that the Laplacian is in $L^2$ and then elliptic regularity theory gives $H^2$ for $u$. But this case, I don't know????










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      Define $Du= -nabla cdot (a(x)nabla u)$ where $a$ is a smooth function which is away from $0$ and bounded.



      Suppose I have $u in H^1(Omega)$ on a smooth bounded domain and I also know that $Du in L^2(Omega)$.



      Does this imply that $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$ and $u in H^2(Omega)$?



      For the Laplacian case: we get immediately that the Laplacian is in $L^2$ and then elliptic regularity theory gives $H^2$ for $u$. But this case, I don't know????










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Define $Du= -nabla cdot (a(x)nabla u)$ where $a$ is a smooth function which is away from $0$ and bounded.



      Suppose I have $u in H^1(Omega)$ on a smooth bounded domain and I also know that $Du in L^2(Omega)$.



      Does this imply that $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$ and $u in H^2(Omega)$?



      For the Laplacian case: we get immediately that the Laplacian is in $L^2$ and then elliptic regularity theory gives $H^2$ for $u$. But this case, I don't know????







      functional-analysis pde regularity-theory-of-pdes






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 2 at 14:52









      StopUsingFacebookStopUsingFacebook

      31718




      31718




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
          $$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
          Rearranging yields
          $$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
          Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
          $$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
          $$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
          Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171948%2felliptic-regularity-for-nabla-cdotax-nabla-u%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
            $$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
            Rearranging yields
            $$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
            Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
            $$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
            $$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
            Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
              $$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
              Rearranging yields
              $$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
              Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
              $$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
              $$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
              Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
                $$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
                Rearranging yields
                $$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
                Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
                $$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
                $$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
                Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                If you expand the divergence in $Du$, you get
                $$- nabla a cdot nabla u - a Delta u = Du$$
                Rearranging yields
                $$Delta u(x) = - frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) - frac1a(x) Du(x)$$
                Since $a$ is smooth and bounded away from $0$, we conclude using Holder's inequality that both terms on the right are in $L^2$. In particular, their norms in $L^2$ are controlled by
                $$leftlVert frac1a(x) nabla a(x) cdot nabla u(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert nabla a rVert_L^infty lVert u rVert_H^1,$$
                $$leftlVert frac1a(x) Du(x) rightrVert_L^2 leq leftlVert frac1a rightrVert_L^infty lVert Du rVert_L^2$$
                Thus, $Delta u in L^2(Omega)$, and elliptic regularity puts $u in H^2$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 3 at 15:57









                StrantsStrants

                5,89921736




                5,89921736



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171948%2felliptic-regularity-for-nabla-cdotax-nabla-u%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

                    Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work

                    Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O