Integers which can be written as sum of powers of $2,3$, and $5$ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Is it true that every positive integer is the sum of 18 fourth powers of integers?Integers represented by the polynomialLower bound on numbers in “extension” to Lagrange four square theoremIs it known whether any positive integer can be written as the sum of $n$ different squares?Can every element of a finite field be written as a sum of two non-squares?Partition of integers with distinct primesEvery sufficiently large natural number can be written as $p+n_1^2+n_2^2$ for some $n_1,n_2$ - natural numbers and $p$ - prime numberthere is an integer $N_0$ such that for all $Ngeq N_0$ the equation $ax+by=N$ can be solved with both $x$ and $y$ nonnegative integers.Can any integer be written as the sum of $M$ odd powers?Which integers can be written as $x^2+2y^2-3z^2 $?
Is this Kuo-toa homebrew race balanced?
Does a random sequence of vectors span a Hilbert space?
Was the pager message from Nick Fury to Captain Marvel unnecessary?
Flight departed from the gate 5 min before scheduled departure time. Refund options
Sally's older brother
Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions
How to achieve cat-like agility?
How do you cope with tons of web fonts when copying and pasting from web pages?
Where and when has Thucydides been studied?
The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?
How to resize main filesystem
Twin's vs. Twins'
Is there a verb for listening stealthily?
Why does BitLocker not use RSA?
Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?
Table formatting with tabularx?
How to infer difference of population proportion between two groups when proportion is small?
Did John Wesley plagiarize Matthew Henry...?
What is "Lambda" in Heston's original paper on stochastic volatility models?
Marquee sign letters
Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?
Inverse square law not accurate for non-point masses?
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
.bashrc alias for a command with fixed second parameter
Integers which can be written as sum of powers of $2,3$, and $5$
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Is it true that every positive integer is the sum of 18 fourth powers of integers?Integers represented by the polynomialLower bound on numbers in “extension” to Lagrange four square theoremIs it known whether any positive integer can be written as the sum of $n$ different squares?Can every element of a finite field be written as a sum of two non-squares?Partition of integers with distinct primesEvery sufficiently large natural number can be written as $p+n_1^2+n_2^2$ for some $n_1,n_2$ - natural numbers and $p$ - prime numberthere is an integer $N_0$ such that for all $Ngeq N_0$ the equation $ax+by=N$ can be solved with both $x$ and $y$ nonnegative integers.Can any integer be written as the sum of $M$ odd powers?Which integers can be written as $x^2+2y^2-3z^2 $?
$begingroup$
Is it true that every sufficiently large integer can be written in the form
$$
2^a3^b5^c+2^d3^e5^f
$$
for some integer $a,b,c,d,e,f ge 0$?
number-theory diophantine-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true that every sufficiently large integer can be written in the form
$$
2^a3^b5^c+2^d3^e5^f
$$
for some integer $a,b,c,d,e,f ge 0$?
number-theory diophantine-equations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Given that each exponent is allowed to be $0$, it is true that every sufficiently small integer ($ge 2$) can be so represented.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:19
$begingroup$
@KeithBackman Are you trolling?
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Apr 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Not at all. I saw Robert Israel's answer, and I tried to find any other small integers that could not be so represented, and found I could construct every integer up to $70$ but not $71$. Just a paper and pencil check on the given answer.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true that every sufficiently large integer can be written in the form
$$
2^a3^b5^c+2^d3^e5^f
$$
for some integer $a,b,c,d,e,f ge 0$?
number-theory diophantine-equations
$endgroup$
Is it true that every sufficiently large integer can be written in the form
$$
2^a3^b5^c+2^d3^e5^f
$$
for some integer $a,b,c,d,e,f ge 0$?
number-theory diophantine-equations
number-theory diophantine-equations
asked Apr 2 at 15:52
Paolo LeonettiPaolo Leonetti
11.3k21550
11.3k21550
$begingroup$
Given that each exponent is allowed to be $0$, it is true that every sufficiently small integer ($ge 2$) can be so represented.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:19
$begingroup$
@KeithBackman Are you trolling?
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Apr 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Not at all. I saw Robert Israel's answer, and I tried to find any other small integers that could not be so represented, and found I could construct every integer up to $70$ but not $71$. Just a paper and pencil check on the given answer.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given that each exponent is allowed to be $0$, it is true that every sufficiently small integer ($ge 2$) can be so represented.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:19
$begingroup$
@KeithBackman Are you trolling?
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Apr 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Not at all. I saw Robert Israel's answer, and I tried to find any other small integers that could not be so represented, and found I could construct every integer up to $70$ but not $71$. Just a paper and pencil check on the given answer.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:25
$begingroup$
Given that each exponent is allowed to be $0$, it is true that every sufficiently small integer ($ge 2$) can be so represented.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:19
$begingroup$
Given that each exponent is allowed to be $0$, it is true that every sufficiently small integer ($ge 2$) can be so represented.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:19
$begingroup$
@KeithBackman Are you trolling?
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Apr 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
@KeithBackman Are you trolling?
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Apr 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Not at all. I saw Robert Israel's answer, and I tried to find any other small integers that could not be so represented, and found I could construct every integer up to $70$ but not $71$. Just a paper and pencil check on the given answer.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:25
$begingroup$
Not at all. I saw Robert Israel's answer, and I tried to find any other small integers that could not be so represented, and found I could construct every integer up to $70$ but not $71$. Just a paper and pencil check on the given answer.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, this is not the case. The number of such possible sums $le N$ for large $N$ is far less than $N$.
The number of powers of $2$ (or of $3$ or $5$) up to $N$ is $O(log N)$. Hence the number of products $2^a 3^b 5^c$ up to $N$ is $O((log N)^3)$. The number of sums of pairs of such products is $O((log N)^6)$, which is $o(N)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No numbers congruent to $71$ or $119$ mod $120$ can be represented in this way.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172032%2fintegers-which-can-be-written-as-sum-of-powers-of-2-3-and-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, this is not the case. The number of such possible sums $le N$ for large $N$ is far less than $N$.
The number of powers of $2$ (or of $3$ or $5$) up to $N$ is $O(log N)$. Hence the number of products $2^a 3^b 5^c$ up to $N$ is $O((log N)^3)$. The number of sums of pairs of such products is $O((log N)^6)$, which is $o(N)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, this is not the case. The number of such possible sums $le N$ for large $N$ is far less than $N$.
The number of powers of $2$ (or of $3$ or $5$) up to $N$ is $O(log N)$. Hence the number of products $2^a 3^b 5^c$ up to $N$ is $O((log N)^3)$. The number of sums of pairs of such products is $O((log N)^6)$, which is $o(N)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, this is not the case. The number of such possible sums $le N$ for large $N$ is far less than $N$.
The number of powers of $2$ (or of $3$ or $5$) up to $N$ is $O(log N)$. Hence the number of products $2^a 3^b 5^c$ up to $N$ is $O((log N)^3)$. The number of sums of pairs of such products is $O((log N)^6)$, which is $o(N)$.
$endgroup$
No, this is not the case. The number of such possible sums $le N$ for large $N$ is far less than $N$.
The number of powers of $2$ (or of $3$ or $5$) up to $N$ is $O(log N)$. Hence the number of products $2^a 3^b 5^c$ up to $N$ is $O((log N)^3)$. The number of sums of pairs of such products is $O((log N)^6)$, which is $o(N)$.
answered Apr 2 at 16:06
FredHFredH
3,6851024
3,6851024
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No numbers congruent to $71$ or $119$ mod $120$ can be represented in this way.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No numbers congruent to $71$ or $119$ mod $120$ can be represented in this way.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No numbers congruent to $71$ or $119$ mod $120$ can be represented in this way.
$endgroup$
No numbers congruent to $71$ or $119$ mod $120$ can be represented in this way.
answered Apr 2 at 16:21
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
332k23222482
332k23222482
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172032%2fintegers-which-can-be-written-as-sum-of-powers-of-2-3-and-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Given that each exponent is allowed to be $0$, it is true that every sufficiently small integer ($ge 2$) can be so represented.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:19
$begingroup$
@KeithBackman Are you trolling?
$endgroup$
– Paolo Leonetti
Apr 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Not at all. I saw Robert Israel's answer, and I tried to find any other small integers that could not be so represented, and found I could construct every integer up to $70$ but not $71$. Just a paper and pencil check on the given answer.
$endgroup$
– Keith Backman
Apr 2 at 18:25