Understanding the Convolution and smoothing Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Proving commutativity of convolution $(f ast g)(x) = (g ast f)(x)$The Sobolev norm for vector-valued functionsSupport of Convolution and SmoothingMinimality in the case of partial derivatives and Sobolev spaces?question regarding to study Sobolev space by Fourier transformconvolutions and mollification of functions in $L^1_textloc(Omega)$Infinitely smoothing pseudodifferential operatorCan Evans's proof for the theorem regarding global approximation of Sobolev functions be significantly simplified?What exactly is the sobolev-space of $L^1$-valued functions?the multiplication in Sobolev spacesUnderstanding a proof related to mollifiers
How could a hydrazine and N2O4 cloud (or it's reactants) show up in weather radar?
Is the time—manner—place ordering of adverbials an oversimplification?
Was the pager message from Nick Fury to Captain Marvel unnecessary?
Noise in Eigenvalues plot
Sally's older brother
Plotting a Maclaurin series
Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?
Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?
Calculation of line of sight system gain
How can I list files in reverse time order by a command and pass them as arguments to another command?
Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?
Google .dev domain strangely redirects to https
NIntegrate on a solution of a matrix ODE
How to achieve cat-like agility?
Fit odd number of triplets in a measure?
What was the last profitable war?
New Order #6: Easter Egg
How to resize main filesystem
Does the universe have a fixed centre of mass?
By what mechanism was the 2017 UK General Election called?
Simple Line in LaTeX Help!
Diophantine equation 3^a+1=3^b+5^c
Where did Ptolemy compare the Earth to the distance of fixed stars?
How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas?
Understanding the Convolution and smoothing
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Proving commutativity of convolution $(f ast g)(x) = (g ast f)(x)$The Sobolev norm for vector-valued functionsSupport of Convolution and SmoothingMinimality in the case of partial derivatives and Sobolev spaces?question regarding to study Sobolev space by Fourier transformconvolutions and mollification of functions in $L^1_textloc(Omega)$Infinitely smoothing pseudodifferential operatorCan Evans's proof for the theorem regarding global approximation of Sobolev functions be significantly simplified?What exactly is the sobolev-space of $L^1$-valued functions?the multiplication in Sobolev spacesUnderstanding a proof related to mollifiers
$begingroup$
here my question is what is mean by $f^epsilon:=eta_epsilon*f$ in $U_epsilon$
and how can we change form $U$ to $B(0,epsilon)$
in the molification definition and what is use convolution in sobolev spaces
and how can we prove that $int eta(x),dx = 1$
is that convulutions is well defined
sobolev-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
here my question is what is mean by $f^epsilon:=eta_epsilon*f$ in $U_epsilon$
and how can we change form $U$ to $B(0,epsilon)$
in the molification definition and what is use convolution in sobolev spaces
and how can we prove that $int eta(x),dx = 1$
is that convulutions is well defined
sobolev-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
here my question is what is mean by $f^epsilon:=eta_epsilon*f$ in $U_epsilon$
and how can we change form $U$ to $B(0,epsilon)$
in the molification definition and what is use convolution in sobolev spaces
and how can we prove that $int eta(x),dx = 1$
is that convulutions is well defined
sobolev-spaces
$endgroup$
here my question is what is mean by $f^epsilon:=eta_epsilon*f$ in $U_epsilon$
and how can we change form $U$ to $B(0,epsilon)$
in the molification definition and what is use convolution in sobolev spaces
and how can we prove that $int eta(x),dx = 1$
is that convulutions is well defined
sobolev-spaces
sobolev-spaces
edited Apr 2 at 19:35
Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
35.6k42972
35.6k42972
asked Apr 2 at 15:53
Inverse ProblemInverse Problem
1,037919
1,037919
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(1) The sign $:=$ means definition.
(2) In the left integral $f(y)$ only makes sense for $yin U$. In the right integral, $eta_epsilon(y) = 0$ when $ynotin B(0,epsilon)$. For the equality see Proving commutativity of convolution $(f ast g)(x) = (g ast f)(x)$.
(3) What means "in the molification definition and what is use convolution in sobolev spaces"?
(4) We choose the constant $C$ for making $int_Bbb R^neta = 1$.
(5) As $f$ is locally integrable and $eta_epsilon$ has compact support the integrand (product of...) is integrable (in both integrals).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes where we use convulation
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 2:11
$begingroup$
..how can we say that $eta _epsilon in C^inffinty$
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 5:19
$begingroup$
@InverseProblem, see andromeda.rutgers.edu/~loftin/ra1fal10/mollifier.pdf.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Apr 3 at 6:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172033%2funderstanding-the-convolution-and-smoothing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(1) The sign $:=$ means definition.
(2) In the left integral $f(y)$ only makes sense for $yin U$. In the right integral, $eta_epsilon(y) = 0$ when $ynotin B(0,epsilon)$. For the equality see Proving commutativity of convolution $(f ast g)(x) = (g ast f)(x)$.
(3) What means "in the molification definition and what is use convolution in sobolev spaces"?
(4) We choose the constant $C$ for making $int_Bbb R^neta = 1$.
(5) As $f$ is locally integrable and $eta_epsilon$ has compact support the integrand (product of...) is integrable (in both integrals).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes where we use convulation
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 2:11
$begingroup$
..how can we say that $eta _epsilon in C^inffinty$
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 5:19
$begingroup$
@InverseProblem, see andromeda.rutgers.edu/~loftin/ra1fal10/mollifier.pdf.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Apr 3 at 6:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(1) The sign $:=$ means definition.
(2) In the left integral $f(y)$ only makes sense for $yin U$. In the right integral, $eta_epsilon(y) = 0$ when $ynotin B(0,epsilon)$. For the equality see Proving commutativity of convolution $(f ast g)(x) = (g ast f)(x)$.
(3) What means "in the molification definition and what is use convolution in sobolev spaces"?
(4) We choose the constant $C$ for making $int_Bbb R^neta = 1$.
(5) As $f$ is locally integrable and $eta_epsilon$ has compact support the integrand (product of...) is integrable (in both integrals).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes where we use convulation
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 2:11
$begingroup$
..how can we say that $eta _epsilon in C^inffinty$
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 5:19
$begingroup$
@InverseProblem, see andromeda.rutgers.edu/~loftin/ra1fal10/mollifier.pdf.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Apr 3 at 6:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(1) The sign $:=$ means definition.
(2) In the left integral $f(y)$ only makes sense for $yin U$. In the right integral, $eta_epsilon(y) = 0$ when $ynotin B(0,epsilon)$. For the equality see Proving commutativity of convolution $(f ast g)(x) = (g ast f)(x)$.
(3) What means "in the molification definition and what is use convolution in sobolev spaces"?
(4) We choose the constant $C$ for making $int_Bbb R^neta = 1$.
(5) As $f$ is locally integrable and $eta_epsilon$ has compact support the integrand (product of...) is integrable (in both integrals).
$endgroup$
(1) The sign $:=$ means definition.
(2) In the left integral $f(y)$ only makes sense for $yin U$. In the right integral, $eta_epsilon(y) = 0$ when $ynotin B(0,epsilon)$. For the equality see Proving commutativity of convolution $(f ast g)(x) = (g ast f)(x)$.
(3) What means "in the molification definition and what is use convolution in sobolev spaces"?
(4) We choose the constant $C$ for making $int_Bbb R^neta = 1$.
(5) As $f$ is locally integrable and $eta_epsilon$ has compact support the integrand (product of...) is integrable (in both integrals).
answered Apr 2 at 19:34
Martín-Blas Pérez PinillaMartín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
35.6k42972
35.6k42972
$begingroup$
Yes where we use convulation
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 2:11
$begingroup$
..how can we say that $eta _epsilon in C^inffinty$
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 5:19
$begingroup$
@InverseProblem, see andromeda.rutgers.edu/~loftin/ra1fal10/mollifier.pdf.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Apr 3 at 6:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes where we use convulation
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 2:11
$begingroup$
..how can we say that $eta _epsilon in C^inffinty$
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 5:19
$begingroup$
@InverseProblem, see andromeda.rutgers.edu/~loftin/ra1fal10/mollifier.pdf.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Apr 3 at 6:10
$begingroup$
Yes where we use convulation
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 2:11
$begingroup$
Yes where we use convulation
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 2:11
$begingroup$
..how can we say that $eta _epsilon in C^inffinty$
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 5:19
$begingroup$
..how can we say that $eta _epsilon in C^inffinty$
$endgroup$
– Inverse Problem
Apr 3 at 5:19
$begingroup$
@InverseProblem, see andromeda.rutgers.edu/~loftin/ra1fal10/mollifier.pdf.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Apr 3 at 6:10
$begingroup$
@InverseProblem, see andromeda.rutgers.edu/~loftin/ra1fal10/mollifier.pdf.
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Apr 3 at 6:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172033%2funderstanding-the-convolution-and-smoothing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown