Implication inside set builder notation. Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Set builder notationSet-Builder notation helpSet builder notation questionSet-builder NotationSet-builder notationHammack set-builder notationSet-Builder Notation Proper NotationHelp using Set Builder NotationSet-builder notation proofImplication inside set builder notation

Table formatting with tabularx?

newbie Q : How to read an output file in one command line

First paper to introduce the "principal-agent problem"

Centre cell vertically in tabularx

Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?

.bashrc alias for a command with fixed second parameter

Diophantine equation 3^a+1=3^b+5^c

Why can't fire hurt Daenerys but it did to Jon Snow in season 1?

How to name indistinguishable henchmen in a screenplay?

Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament?

By what mechanism was the 2017 UK General Election called?

Statistical analysis applied to methods coming out of Machine Learning

Baking rewards as operations

Did John Wesley plagiarize Matthew Henry...?

Is the time—manner—place ordering of adverbials an oversimplification?

How to make an animal which can only breed for a certain number of generations?

Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

Besides transaction validation, are there any other uses of the Script language in Bitcoin

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

New Order #6: Easter Egg

calculator's angle answer for trig ratios that can work in more than 1 quadrant on the unit circle

What did Turing mean when saying that "machines cannot give rise to surprises" is due to a fallacy?

Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5;



Implication inside set builder notation.



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Set builder notationSet-Builder notation helpSet builder notation questionSet-builder NotationSet-builder notationHammack set-builder notationSet-Builder Notation Proper NotationHelp using Set Builder NotationSet-builder notation proofImplication inside set builder notation










-4












$begingroup$


[ Edited ]
A candidate at the Presidential Elections , representing the Intellectual-Leftwing-Party, adopts as slogan :



" Any person should vote for me just in case
if she studied at Harvard , she has earned a PhD "



According to this slogan, the set of people that should vote for this candidate is :



 x 


From the point of view of logic is this candidate too elitist to win?



Who should vote for him according to that slogan?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Nothing in the rule set describes conditions on non-girls, so there can be boy musicians and boy non-musicians.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Apr 2 at 15:50







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sets are mathematical objects which model the notion of a collection of other mathematical objects. As such, in order for the collection you describe to be a set, girls and musicians need to be mathematical objects, to the best of my knowledge, this is not the case.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Apr 2 at 15:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. $text Socrates in x mid x text is a girl to x text is a musician $.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 2 at 15:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Bob is being sexist. The only girls which are allowed to attend are musicians, but everything which isn't a girl is free to attend his party. I wouldn't be friends with Bob.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Apr 2 at 16:01











  • $begingroup$
    Asked around an hour later at matheducators.stackexchange.com/q/15435/77.
    $endgroup$
    – Joel Reyes Noche
    Apr 2 at 22:48















-4












$begingroup$


[ Edited ]
A candidate at the Presidential Elections , representing the Intellectual-Leftwing-Party, adopts as slogan :



" Any person should vote for me just in case
if she studied at Harvard , she has earned a PhD "



According to this slogan, the set of people that should vote for this candidate is :



 x 


From the point of view of logic is this candidate too elitist to win?



Who should vote for him according to that slogan?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Nothing in the rule set describes conditions on non-girls, so there can be boy musicians and boy non-musicians.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Apr 2 at 15:50







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sets are mathematical objects which model the notion of a collection of other mathematical objects. As such, in order for the collection you describe to be a set, girls and musicians need to be mathematical objects, to the best of my knowledge, this is not the case.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Apr 2 at 15:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. $text Socrates in x mid x text is a girl to x text is a musician $.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 2 at 15:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Bob is being sexist. The only girls which are allowed to attend are musicians, but everything which isn't a girl is free to attend his party. I wouldn't be friends with Bob.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Apr 2 at 16:01











  • $begingroup$
    Asked around an hour later at matheducators.stackexchange.com/q/15435/77.
    $endgroup$
    – Joel Reyes Noche
    Apr 2 at 22:48













-4












-4








-4


0



$begingroup$


[ Edited ]
A candidate at the Presidential Elections , representing the Intellectual-Leftwing-Party, adopts as slogan :



" Any person should vote for me just in case
if she studied at Harvard , she has earned a PhD "



According to this slogan, the set of people that should vote for this candidate is :



 x 


From the point of view of logic is this candidate too elitist to win?



Who should vote for him according to that slogan?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




[ Edited ]
A candidate at the Presidential Elections , representing the Intellectual-Leftwing-Party, adopts as slogan :



" Any person should vote for me just in case
if she studied at Harvard , she has earned a PhD "



According to this slogan, the set of people that should vote for this candidate is :



 x 


From the point of view of logic is this candidate too elitist to win?



Who should vote for him according to that slogan?







elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 3 at 12:29







Ray LittleRock

















asked Apr 2 at 15:48









Ray LittleRockRay LittleRock

11110




11110







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Nothing in the rule set describes conditions on non-girls, so there can be boy musicians and boy non-musicians.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Apr 2 at 15:50







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sets are mathematical objects which model the notion of a collection of other mathematical objects. As such, in order for the collection you describe to be a set, girls and musicians need to be mathematical objects, to the best of my knowledge, this is not the case.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Apr 2 at 15:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. $text Socrates in x mid x text is a girl to x text is a musician $.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 2 at 15:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Bob is being sexist. The only girls which are allowed to attend are musicians, but everything which isn't a girl is free to attend his party. I wouldn't be friends with Bob.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Apr 2 at 16:01











  • $begingroup$
    Asked around an hour later at matheducators.stackexchange.com/q/15435/77.
    $endgroup$
    – Joel Reyes Noche
    Apr 2 at 22:48












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Nothing in the rule set describes conditions on non-girls, so there can be boy musicians and boy non-musicians.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Apr 2 at 15:50







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sets are mathematical objects which model the notion of a collection of other mathematical objects. As such, in order for the collection you describe to be a set, girls and musicians need to be mathematical objects, to the best of my knowledge, this is not the case.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Apr 2 at 15:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. $text Socrates in x mid x text is a girl to x text is a musician $.
    $endgroup$
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    Apr 2 at 15:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Bob is being sexist. The only girls which are allowed to attend are musicians, but everything which isn't a girl is free to attend his party. I wouldn't be friends with Bob.
    $endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Apr 2 at 16:01











  • $begingroup$
    Asked around an hour later at matheducators.stackexchange.com/q/15435/77.
    $endgroup$
    – Joel Reyes Noche
    Apr 2 at 22:48







2




2




$begingroup$
Nothing in the rule set describes conditions on non-girls, so there can be boy musicians and boy non-musicians.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 2 at 15:50





$begingroup$
Nothing in the rule set describes conditions on non-girls, so there can be boy musicians and boy non-musicians.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Apr 2 at 15:50





1




1




$begingroup$
Sets are mathematical objects which model the notion of a collection of other mathematical objects. As such, in order for the collection you describe to be a set, girls and musicians need to be mathematical objects, to the best of my knowledge, this is not the case.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila
Apr 2 at 15:50




$begingroup$
Sets are mathematical objects which model the notion of a collection of other mathematical objects. As such, in order for the collection you describe to be a set, girls and musicians need to be mathematical objects, to the best of my knowledge, this is not the case.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila
Apr 2 at 15:50




1




1




$begingroup$
Yes. $text Socrates in x mid x text is a girl to x text is a musician $.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 2 at 15:51




$begingroup$
Yes. $text Socrates in x mid x text is a girl to x text is a musician $.
$endgroup$
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
Apr 2 at 15:51




1




1




$begingroup$
Bob is being sexist. The only girls which are allowed to attend are musicians, but everything which isn't a girl is free to attend his party. I wouldn't be friends with Bob.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila
Apr 2 at 16:01





$begingroup$
Bob is being sexist. The only girls which are allowed to attend are musicians, but everything which isn't a girl is free to attend his party. I wouldn't be friends with Bob.
$endgroup$
– Asaf Karagila
Apr 2 at 16:01













$begingroup$
Asked around an hour later at matheducators.stackexchange.com/q/15435/77.
$endgroup$
– Joel Reyes Noche
Apr 2 at 22:48




$begingroup$
Asked around an hour later at matheducators.stackexchange.com/q/15435/77.
$endgroup$
– Joel Reyes Noche
Apr 2 at 22:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

A deaf dog can attend Bob's party.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your answer could be interpreted by a beginner as meaning that the set defined is the universal set. ( I voted up however).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    The formula in the body of the question defines a subset of the set of persons. So the answer is correct assuming a dog is a person.
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 19:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not an enthusiast supporter of Descartes' animal-machine theory.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSilverDoe
    Apr 2 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Let's avoid opinion based commentaries. ( But I respect your opinion SilverDoe).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 20:22











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172021%2fimplication-inside-set-builder-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

A deaf dog can attend Bob's party.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your answer could be interpreted by a beginner as meaning that the set defined is the universal set. ( I voted up however).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    The formula in the body of the question defines a subset of the set of persons. So the answer is correct assuming a dog is a person.
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 19:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not an enthusiast supporter of Descartes' animal-machine theory.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSilverDoe
    Apr 2 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Let's avoid opinion based commentaries. ( But I respect your opinion SilverDoe).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 20:22















3












$begingroup$

A deaf dog can attend Bob's party.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your answer could be interpreted by a beginner as meaning that the set defined is the universal set. ( I voted up however).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    The formula in the body of the question defines a subset of the set of persons. So the answer is correct assuming a dog is a person.
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 19:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not an enthusiast supporter of Descartes' animal-machine theory.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSilverDoe
    Apr 2 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Let's avoid opinion based commentaries. ( But I respect your opinion SilverDoe).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 20:22













3












3








3





$begingroup$

A deaf dog can attend Bob's party.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



A deaf dog can attend Bob's party.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Apr 2 at 15:51









TheSilverDoeTheSilverDoe

5,593316




5,593316











  • $begingroup$
    Your answer could be interpreted by a beginner as meaning that the set defined is the universal set. ( I voted up however).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    The formula in the body of the question defines a subset of the set of persons. So the answer is correct assuming a dog is a person.
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 19:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not an enthusiast supporter of Descartes' animal-machine theory.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSilverDoe
    Apr 2 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Let's avoid opinion based commentaries. ( But I respect your opinion SilverDoe).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 20:22
















  • $begingroup$
    Your answer could be interpreted by a beginner as meaning that the set defined is the universal set. ( I voted up however).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    The formula in the body of the question defines a subset of the set of persons. So the answer is correct assuming a dog is a person.
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 19:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not an enthusiast supporter of Descartes' animal-machine theory.
    $endgroup$
    – TheSilverDoe
    Apr 2 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    Let's avoid opinion based commentaries. ( But I respect your opinion SilverDoe).
    $endgroup$
    – Ray LittleRock
    Apr 2 at 20:22















$begingroup$
Your answer could be interpreted by a beginner as meaning that the set defined is the universal set. ( I voted up however).
$endgroup$
– Ray LittleRock
Apr 2 at 16:39




$begingroup$
Your answer could be interpreted by a beginner as meaning that the set defined is the universal set. ( I voted up however).
$endgroup$
– Ray LittleRock
Apr 2 at 16:39












$begingroup$
The formula in the body of the question defines a subset of the set of persons. So the answer is correct assuming a dog is a person.
$endgroup$
– Ray LittleRock
Apr 2 at 19:17




$begingroup$
The formula in the body of the question defines a subset of the set of persons. So the answer is correct assuming a dog is a person.
$endgroup$
– Ray LittleRock
Apr 2 at 19:17




1




1




$begingroup$
I am not an enthusiast supporter of Descartes' animal-machine theory.
$endgroup$
– TheSilverDoe
Apr 2 at 20:04




$begingroup$
I am not an enthusiast supporter of Descartes' animal-machine theory.
$endgroup$
– TheSilverDoe
Apr 2 at 20:04












$begingroup$
Let's avoid opinion based commentaries. ( But I respect your opinion SilverDoe).
$endgroup$
– Ray LittleRock
Apr 2 at 20:22




$begingroup$
Let's avoid opinion based commentaries. ( But I respect your opinion SilverDoe).
$endgroup$
– Ray LittleRock
Apr 2 at 20:22

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3172021%2fimplication-inside-set-builder-notation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ