$K$-Theory of operators I, Higson notes Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Special elements in the $C^*$ algebra $A otimes mathcalK$.K-theory for non-separable C*-algebrasK-theory, $K_0$ of algebra of compact operatorsWhat is the motivation of studying $P[A]$ in operator K-theory?K-theory of $C_0(X)$Periodicity of Fredholm operators for proving Bott periodicityIn what way is $sigma(L) in K(T^*X)$ in the $K$-theoretic formulation of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem?Operator K-theory and Topological K-theoryInduced $K$-theory maps between $C^*$ algebras.Understanding the map from $K_0(A)$ to homotopy class of maps,Special elements in the $C^*$ algebra $A otimes mathcalK$.

Simulating Exploding Dice

Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?

When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?

Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?

Working around an AWS network ACL rule limit

Single author papers against my advisor's will?

What is the electric potential inside a point charge?

If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"

What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?

Choo-choo! Word trains

How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?

Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?

Cauchy Sequence Characterized only By Directly Neighbouring Sequence Members

Stopping real property loss from eroding embankment

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?

Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?

Strange behaviour of Check

What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?

Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Jazz greats knew nothing of modes. Why are they used to improvise on standards?

Slither Like a Snake

Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?



$K$-Theory of operators I, Higson notes



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Special elements in the $C^*$ algebra $A otimes mathcalK$.K-theory for non-separable C*-algebrasK-theory, $K_0$ of algebra of compact operatorsWhat is the motivation of studying $P[A]$ in operator K-theory?K-theory of $C_0(X)$Periodicity of Fredholm operators for proving Bott periodicityIn what way is $sigma(L) in K(T^*X)$ in the $K$-theoretic formulation of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem?Operator K-theory and Topological K-theoryInduced $K$-theory maps between $C^*$ algebras.Understanding the map from $K_0(A)$ to homotopy class of maps,Special elements in the $C^*$ algebra $A otimes mathcalK$.










3












$begingroup$


I am having trouble understanding the following statement:




3.20 Proposition, pg44: Let $D$ be a symmetric, odd graded elliptic operator on a graded vector bundle $S$ over a compact manifold. The element $[phi_D] in K(Bbb C) cong Bbb Z$ is the Fredholm index of the operator $D$.





What exactly are used in making sense of this statement:



  1. Def 2.10, page 19. A Graded $*$-homomoprhism $phi_D:mathcalS rightarrow mathcalK(H)$ from spectral theorem.


  2. Prop 3.17. There is an isomoprhism $$Phi:K(A) rightarrow [mathcalS, A otimes mathcalK(H)]$$


What the above two means is explain in my other post.




The proof goes as follows:




We have a homotopy of $*$-homomoprhisms $phi_s^-1D(f) = f(s^-1D)$. At $s=1$ we have $phi_D$ at $s=0$ we have the homomorphism of $f mapsto f(0)P$ where $P$ is projection onto the kernel of $D$.




How does one obtain continuity at $s=0$ - why is the resulting map as described?




This corresponds to the integer $dim(ker D cap H_+) - dim (ker D cap H_-)$.




How does one make this computation?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    I am having trouble understanding the following statement:




    3.20 Proposition, pg44: Let $D$ be a symmetric, odd graded elliptic operator on a graded vector bundle $S$ over a compact manifold. The element $[phi_D] in K(Bbb C) cong Bbb Z$ is the Fredholm index of the operator $D$.





    What exactly are used in making sense of this statement:



    1. Def 2.10, page 19. A Graded $*$-homomoprhism $phi_D:mathcalS rightarrow mathcalK(H)$ from spectral theorem.


    2. Prop 3.17. There is an isomoprhism $$Phi:K(A) rightarrow [mathcalS, A otimes mathcalK(H)]$$


    What the above two means is explain in my other post.




    The proof goes as follows:




    We have a homotopy of $*$-homomoprhisms $phi_s^-1D(f) = f(s^-1D)$. At $s=1$ we have $phi_D$ at $s=0$ we have the homomorphism of $f mapsto f(0)P$ where $P$ is projection onto the kernel of $D$.




    How does one obtain continuity at $s=0$ - why is the resulting map as described?




    This corresponds to the integer $dim(ker D cap H_+) - dim (ker D cap H_-)$.




    How does one make this computation?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am having trouble understanding the following statement:




      3.20 Proposition, pg44: Let $D$ be a symmetric, odd graded elliptic operator on a graded vector bundle $S$ over a compact manifold. The element $[phi_D] in K(Bbb C) cong Bbb Z$ is the Fredholm index of the operator $D$.





      What exactly are used in making sense of this statement:



      1. Def 2.10, page 19. A Graded $*$-homomoprhism $phi_D:mathcalS rightarrow mathcalK(H)$ from spectral theorem.


      2. Prop 3.17. There is an isomoprhism $$Phi:K(A) rightarrow [mathcalS, A otimes mathcalK(H)]$$


      What the above two means is explain in my other post.




      The proof goes as follows:




      We have a homotopy of $*$-homomoprhisms $phi_s^-1D(f) = f(s^-1D)$. At $s=1$ we have $phi_D$ at $s=0$ we have the homomorphism of $f mapsto f(0)P$ where $P$ is projection onto the kernel of $D$.




      How does one obtain continuity at $s=0$ - why is the resulting map as described?




      This corresponds to the integer $dim(ker D cap H_+) - dim (ker D cap H_-)$.




      How does one make this computation?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am having trouble understanding the following statement:




      3.20 Proposition, pg44: Let $D$ be a symmetric, odd graded elliptic operator on a graded vector bundle $S$ over a compact manifold. The element $[phi_D] in K(Bbb C) cong Bbb Z$ is the Fredholm index of the operator $D$.





      What exactly are used in making sense of this statement:



      1. Def 2.10, page 19. A Graded $*$-homomoprhism $phi_D:mathcalS rightarrow mathcalK(H)$ from spectral theorem.


      2. Prop 3.17. There is an isomoprhism $$Phi:K(A) rightarrow [mathcalS, A otimes mathcalK(H)]$$


      What the above two means is explain in my other post.




      The proof goes as follows:




      We have a homotopy of $*$-homomoprhisms $phi_s^-1D(f) = f(s^-1D)$. At $s=1$ we have $phi_D$ at $s=0$ we have the homomorphism of $f mapsto f(0)P$ where $P$ is projection onto the kernel of $D$.




      How does one obtain continuity at $s=0$ - why is the resulting map as described?




      This corresponds to the integer $dim(ker D cap H_+) - dim (ker D cap H_-)$.




      How does one make this computation?







      operator-algebras k-theory topological-k-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 18 at 17:55









      CL.CL.

      2,2723925




      2,2723925




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



          If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
          $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
          As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



          Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
          $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



          We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



          We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153097%2fk-theory-of-operators-i-higson-notes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



            If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
            $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
            As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



            Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
            $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



            We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



            We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



              If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
              $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
              As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



              Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
              $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



              We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



              We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



                If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
                $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
                As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



                Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
                $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



                We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



                We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The operator $D$ here is special: If $D$ is elliptic on a compact manifold, it will have compact resolvant by Rellich's lemma: $(1+D^2)^-frac12$ is compact. Therefore the spectrum of $D$ are eigenvalues, they have no limit point except $lambda=+infty$. If $f(x)$ is a continuous function of spectrum of $D$, $f(D)$ is well-defined. This will contain something like $delta_0(x)$ who is 1 when $x=0$ and is 0 elsewhere. This is not continuous on $mathbbR$, but is continuous on the spectrum of $D$!



                If $f$ vanishes at the infinity, $f(D)$ is bounded. The continuity of the operators $f(s^-1D)$ are considered under the norm topology. Since
                $$lim_sto 0 f(s^-1x)to delta_0(x)f(0)$$
                As continuous functions over the spectrum of $D$. Also $delta_0(D)$ is the projection $P$ to the eigenspace for $lambda=0$. We have the first limit of your question (1).



                Also by the result of compact resolvant, the dimension of the eigenspaces are finite dimensional, Let $P_+ ,P_-$ be the projection on $ker Dcap H_+$, $ker Dcap H_-$ respectivly. They will be trace-class operators(as operators on $L^2(M)$. We have
                $$ dim(ker Dcap H_+)=Tr(P_+),quad dim(ker Dcap H_-)=Tr(P_-)$$



                We define a "supertrace" $Str(P):=Tr(P_+)-Tr(P_-)$.



                We have $Index(D)=Str(P)$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 8 at 0:55









                RuiRui

                261




                261



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153097%2fk-theory-of-operators-i-higson-notes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

                    Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

                    Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ