Any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Some operators on $ell^2$ of a discrete group: are they a von Neumann algebra?Reduced $C^*$-algebra of a direct product of locally compact groupsCompact operators on $L^2(G)$ as a reduced cross product of $C_0(G)$ and $G$.Proving linearity of an operator using boundedness.Show that there is an operator $T$ in $mathcalB(mathcalH)$If $(mathcal D(A),A)$ is a linear operator, then $mathcal D(A)subseteqmathcal D(A^1/2)$Inner product of hermitian conjugate identity in QMIdenitfying $PmathbbB(l^2(Gamma))P$ with the matrix algebra $M_F(mathbbC)$The reduced crossed product $Artimes_alpha,rGamma$ doesn't depend on the choice of the faithful representationDoes the set of characters, $Omega(mathcalA)$, over a C$^ast$-algebra, $mathcalA$, generate a weakly dense subspace of $mathcalA'$?
Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?
How do I automatically answer y in bash script?
Can a monk deflect thrown melee weapons?
How to say 'striped' in Latin
Choo-choo! Word trains
How should I respond to a player wanting to catch a sword between their hands?
Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?
Statistical model of ligand substitution
Biased dice probability question
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Direct Experience of Meditation
Jazz greats knew nothing of modes. Why are they used to improvise on standards?
Who can trigger ship-wide alerts in Star Trek?
Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?
Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?
Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?
Area of a 2D convex hull
What is the electric potential inside a point charge?
How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?
When is phishing education going too far?
New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff
Antler Helmet: Can it work?
How can you insert a "times/divide" symbol similar to the "plus/minus" (±) one?
How to set letter above or below the symbol?
Any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Some operators on $ell^2$ of a discrete group: are they a von Neumann algebra?Reduced $C^*$-algebra of a direct product of locally compact groupsCompact operators on $L^2(G)$ as a reduced cross product of $C_0(G)$ and $G$.Proving linearity of an operator using boundedness.Show that there is an operator $T$ in $mathcalB(mathcalH)$If $(mathcal D(A),A)$ is a linear operator, then $mathcal D(A)subseteqmathcal D(A^1/2)$Inner product of hermitian conjugate identity in QMIdenitfying $PmathbbB(l^2(Gamma))P$ with the matrix algebra $M_F(mathbbC)$The reduced crossed product $Artimes_alpha,rGamma$ doesn't depend on the choice of the faithful representationDoes the set of characters, $Omega(mathcalA)$, over a C$^ast$-algebra, $mathcalA$, generate a weakly dense subspace of $mathcalA'$?
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a countable group with neutral element $e$. Consider the Hilbert space $$ell^2(G):=left x(t)$$ with inner product $left langle x,y right rangle=sum_tin Gx(t)overliney(t)$ for $x,yin ell^2(G)$. For each $tin G$, let $delta_tin ell^2(G)$ be defined by $delta_t(t)=1$ and $delta_t(s)=0$ if $sneq t$. The set $(delta_t)_tin G$ is an orthonormal basis for $ell^2(G)$, and $x(t)=left langle x,delta_t right rangle$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $tin G$.
For each $tin G$, consider the operator $U_t$ on $ell^2(G)$ given by $(U_tx)(s)=x(t^-1s)$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $sin G$.
Put $mathcalL(G)= U_tmid tin G''$. Consider the state $tau$ on $mathcalL(G)$ defined by $tau(T)=left langle Tdelta_e,delta_e right rangle$ for $Tin mathcalL(G)$.
Problems
1) Show that $tau(ST)=tau(TS)$ for all for all $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$.
3) Show that any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary
My answers:
1) I am not sure about this part. If $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$, then we can write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ and $T=sum_tin Gbeta_tU_t$. Can I write the multiplication
$$
ST=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tU_sU_t
$$
where $gamma_s,t$'s are complex numbers in terms of $alpha$ and $beta$? If not, how would you write it mathematically? Assume that this is true. I have shown that $U_sU_t=U_st$ and $U_tdelta_s=delta_ts$. Then we have
$$
tau(ST)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,ttau(U_st)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle U_stdelta_e,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle delta_st,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_st(e)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_ts(e)=dots=tau(TS)
$$
Is this correct?
I am not sure about the last problem. Could you help me with it? The problem 2) was as follows: Show that $tau(T^* T)=0$ implies $T=0$ for all $Tin mathcalL(G)$. I have solved this one. Just informing it if it is relevant for the last problem.
Is some informations are missing, please let me know.
functional-analysis operator-algebras c-star-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a countable group with neutral element $e$. Consider the Hilbert space $$ell^2(G):=left x(t)$$ with inner product $left langle x,y right rangle=sum_tin Gx(t)overliney(t)$ for $x,yin ell^2(G)$. For each $tin G$, let $delta_tin ell^2(G)$ be defined by $delta_t(t)=1$ and $delta_t(s)=0$ if $sneq t$. The set $(delta_t)_tin G$ is an orthonormal basis for $ell^2(G)$, and $x(t)=left langle x,delta_t right rangle$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $tin G$.
For each $tin G$, consider the operator $U_t$ on $ell^2(G)$ given by $(U_tx)(s)=x(t^-1s)$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $sin G$.
Put $mathcalL(G)= U_tmid tin G''$. Consider the state $tau$ on $mathcalL(G)$ defined by $tau(T)=left langle Tdelta_e,delta_e right rangle$ for $Tin mathcalL(G)$.
Problems
1) Show that $tau(ST)=tau(TS)$ for all for all $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$.
3) Show that any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary
My answers:
1) I am not sure about this part. If $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$, then we can write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ and $T=sum_tin Gbeta_tU_t$. Can I write the multiplication
$$
ST=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tU_sU_t
$$
where $gamma_s,t$'s are complex numbers in terms of $alpha$ and $beta$? If not, how would you write it mathematically? Assume that this is true. I have shown that $U_sU_t=U_st$ and $U_tdelta_s=delta_ts$. Then we have
$$
tau(ST)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,ttau(U_st)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle U_stdelta_e,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle delta_st,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_st(e)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_ts(e)=dots=tau(TS)
$$
Is this correct?
I am not sure about the last problem. Could you help me with it? The problem 2) was as follows: Show that $tau(T^* T)=0$ implies $T=0$ for all $Tin mathcalL(G)$. I have solved this one. Just informing it if it is relevant for the last problem.
Is some informations are missing, please let me know.
functional-analysis operator-algebras c-star-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $G$ be a countable group with neutral element $e$. Consider the Hilbert space $$ell^2(G):=left x(t)$$ with inner product $left langle x,y right rangle=sum_tin Gx(t)overliney(t)$ for $x,yin ell^2(G)$. For each $tin G$, let $delta_tin ell^2(G)$ be defined by $delta_t(t)=1$ and $delta_t(s)=0$ if $sneq t$. The set $(delta_t)_tin G$ is an orthonormal basis for $ell^2(G)$, and $x(t)=left langle x,delta_t right rangle$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $tin G$.
For each $tin G$, consider the operator $U_t$ on $ell^2(G)$ given by $(U_tx)(s)=x(t^-1s)$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $sin G$.
Put $mathcalL(G)= U_tmid tin G''$. Consider the state $tau$ on $mathcalL(G)$ defined by $tau(T)=left langle Tdelta_e,delta_e right rangle$ for $Tin mathcalL(G)$.
Problems
1) Show that $tau(ST)=tau(TS)$ for all for all $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$.
3) Show that any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary
My answers:
1) I am not sure about this part. If $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$, then we can write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ and $T=sum_tin Gbeta_tU_t$. Can I write the multiplication
$$
ST=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tU_sU_t
$$
where $gamma_s,t$'s are complex numbers in terms of $alpha$ and $beta$? If not, how would you write it mathematically? Assume that this is true. I have shown that $U_sU_t=U_st$ and $U_tdelta_s=delta_ts$. Then we have
$$
tau(ST)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,ttau(U_st)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle U_stdelta_e,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle delta_st,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_st(e)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_ts(e)=dots=tau(TS)
$$
Is this correct?
I am not sure about the last problem. Could you help me with it? The problem 2) was as follows: Show that $tau(T^* T)=0$ implies $T=0$ for all $Tin mathcalL(G)$. I have solved this one. Just informing it if it is relevant for the last problem.
Is some informations are missing, please let me know.
functional-analysis operator-algebras c-star-algebras
$endgroup$
Let $G$ be a countable group with neutral element $e$. Consider the Hilbert space $$ell^2(G):=left x(t)$$ with inner product $left langle x,y right rangle=sum_tin Gx(t)overliney(t)$ for $x,yin ell^2(G)$. For each $tin G$, let $delta_tin ell^2(G)$ be defined by $delta_t(t)=1$ and $delta_t(s)=0$ if $sneq t$. The set $(delta_t)_tin G$ is an orthonormal basis for $ell^2(G)$, and $x(t)=left langle x,delta_t right rangle$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $tin G$.
For each $tin G$, consider the operator $U_t$ on $ell^2(G)$ given by $(U_tx)(s)=x(t^-1s)$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $sin G$.
Put $mathcalL(G)= U_tmid tin G''$. Consider the state $tau$ on $mathcalL(G)$ defined by $tau(T)=left langle Tdelta_e,delta_e right rangle$ for $Tin mathcalL(G)$.
Problems
1) Show that $tau(ST)=tau(TS)$ for all for all $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$.
3) Show that any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary
My answers:
1) I am not sure about this part. If $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$, then we can write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ and $T=sum_tin Gbeta_tU_t$. Can I write the multiplication
$$
ST=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tU_sU_t
$$
where $gamma_s,t$'s are complex numbers in terms of $alpha$ and $beta$? If not, how would you write it mathematically? Assume that this is true. I have shown that $U_sU_t=U_st$ and $U_tdelta_s=delta_ts$. Then we have
$$
tau(ST)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,ttau(U_st)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle U_stdelta_e,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle delta_st,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_st(e)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_ts(e)=dots=tau(TS)
$$
Is this correct?
I am not sure about the last problem. Could you help me with it? The problem 2) was as follows: Show that $tau(T^* T)=0$ implies $T=0$ for all $Tin mathcalL(G)$. I have solved this one. Just informing it if it is relevant for the last problem.
Is some informations are missing, please let me know.
functional-analysis operator-algebras c-star-algebras
functional-analysis operator-algebras c-star-algebras
edited Apr 1 at 0:19
Martin Argerami
129k1184185
129k1184185
asked Mar 31 at 19:31
UnknownWUnknownW
1,045922
1,045922
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.
Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
beginalign
tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
=sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
&=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
endalign
For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
$$
tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
$$
Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 12:03
$begingroup$
The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 1 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 20:25
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169805%2fany-isometry-in-mathcallg-must-be-a-unitary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.
Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
beginalign
tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
=sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
&=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
endalign
For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
$$
tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
$$
Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 12:03
$begingroup$
The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 1 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 20:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.
Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
beginalign
tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
=sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
&=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
endalign
For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
$$
tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
$$
Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 12:03
$begingroup$
The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 1 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 20:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.
Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
beginalign
tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
=sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
&=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
endalign
For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
$$
tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
$$
Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.
$endgroup$
For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.
Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
beginalign
tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
=sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
&=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
endalign
For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
$$
tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
$$
Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.
answered Mar 31 at 23:40
Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami
129k1184185
129k1184185
$begingroup$
Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 12:03
$begingroup$
The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 1 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 20:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 12:03
$begingroup$
The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 1 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 20:25
$begingroup$
Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 12:03
$begingroup$
Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 12:03
$begingroup$
The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 1 at 13:51
$begingroup$
The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Apr 1 at 13:51
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 20:25
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
$endgroup$
– UnknownW
Apr 1 at 20:25
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169805%2fany-isometry-in-mathcallg-must-be-a-unitary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown