Any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Some operators on $ell^2$ of a discrete group: are they a von Neumann algebra?Reduced $C^*$-algebra of a direct product of locally compact groupsCompact operators on $L^2(G)$ as a reduced cross product of $C_0(G)$ and $G$.Proving linearity of an operator using boundedness.Show that there is an operator $T$ in $mathcalB(mathcalH)$If $(mathcal D(A),A)$ is a linear operator, then $mathcal D(A)subseteqmathcal D(A^1/2)$Inner product of hermitian conjugate identity in QMIdenitfying $PmathbbB(l^2(Gamma))P$ with the matrix algebra $M_F(mathbbC)$The reduced crossed product $Artimes_alpha,rGamma$ doesn't depend on the choice of the faithful representationDoes the set of characters, $Omega(mathcalA)$, over a C$^ast$-algebra, $mathcalA$, generate a weakly dense subspace of $mathcalA'$?

Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?

How do I automatically answer y in bash script?

Can a monk deflect thrown melee weapons?

How to say 'striped' in Latin

Choo-choo! Word trains

How should I respond to a player wanting to catch a sword between their hands?

Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?

Statistical model of ligand substitution

Biased dice probability question

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Direct Experience of Meditation

Jazz greats knew nothing of modes. Why are they used to improvise on standards?

Who can trigger ship-wide alerts in Star Trek?

Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?

Is there a service that would inform me whenever a new direct route is scheduled from a given airport?

Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?

Area of a 2D convex hull

What is the electric potential inside a point charge?

How can players take actions together that are impossible otherwise?

When is phishing education going too far?

New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff

Antler Helmet: Can it work?

How can you insert a "times/divide" symbol similar to the "plus/minus" (±) one?

How to set letter above or below the symbol?



Any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Some operators on $ell^2$ of a discrete group: are they a von Neumann algebra?Reduced $C^*$-algebra of a direct product of locally compact groupsCompact operators on $L^2(G)$ as a reduced cross product of $C_0(G)$ and $G$.Proving linearity of an operator using boundedness.Show that there is an operator $T$ in $mathcalB(mathcalH)$If $(mathcal D(A),A)$ is a linear operator, then $mathcal D(A)subseteqmathcal D(A^1/2)$Inner product of hermitian conjugate identity in QMIdenitfying $PmathbbB(l^2(Gamma))P$ with the matrix algebra $M_F(mathbbC)$The reduced crossed product $Artimes_alpha,rGamma$ doesn't depend on the choice of the faithful representationDoes the set of characters, $Omega(mathcalA)$, over a C$^ast$-algebra, $mathcalA$, generate a weakly dense subspace of $mathcalA'$?










4












$begingroup$


Let $G$ be a countable group with neutral element $e$. Consider the Hilbert space $$ell^2(G):=left x(t)$$ with inner product $left langle x,y right rangle=sum_tin Gx(t)overliney(t)$ for $x,yin ell^2(G)$. For each $tin G$, let $delta_tin ell^2(G)$ be defined by $delta_t(t)=1$ and $delta_t(s)=0$ if $sneq t$. The set $(delta_t)_tin G$ is an orthonormal basis for $ell^2(G)$, and $x(t)=left langle x,delta_t right rangle$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $tin G$.



For each $tin G$, consider the operator $U_t$ on $ell^2(G)$ given by $(U_tx)(s)=x(t^-1s)$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $sin G$.



Put $mathcalL(G)= U_tmid tin G''$. Consider the state $tau$ on $mathcalL(G)$ defined by $tau(T)=left langle Tdelta_e,delta_e right rangle$ for $Tin mathcalL(G)$.



Problems



1) Show that $tau(ST)=tau(TS)$ for all for all $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$.



3) Show that any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary



My answers:



1) I am not sure about this part. If $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$, then we can write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ and $T=sum_tin Gbeta_tU_t$. Can I write the multiplication
$$
ST=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tU_sU_t
$$

where $gamma_s,t$'s are complex numbers in terms of $alpha$ and $beta$? If not, how would you write it mathematically? Assume that this is true. I have shown that $U_sU_t=U_st$ and $U_tdelta_s=delta_ts$. Then we have
$$
tau(ST)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,ttau(U_st)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle U_stdelta_e,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle delta_st,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_st(e)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_ts(e)=dots=tau(TS)
$$

Is this correct?



I am not sure about the last problem. Could you help me with it? The problem 2) was as follows: Show that $tau(T^* T)=0$ implies $T=0$ for all $Tin mathcalL(G)$. I have solved this one. Just informing it if it is relevant for the last problem.



Is some informations are missing, please let me know.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    Let $G$ be a countable group with neutral element $e$. Consider the Hilbert space $$ell^2(G):=left x(t)$$ with inner product $left langle x,y right rangle=sum_tin Gx(t)overliney(t)$ for $x,yin ell^2(G)$. For each $tin G$, let $delta_tin ell^2(G)$ be defined by $delta_t(t)=1$ and $delta_t(s)=0$ if $sneq t$. The set $(delta_t)_tin G$ is an orthonormal basis for $ell^2(G)$, and $x(t)=left langle x,delta_t right rangle$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $tin G$.



    For each $tin G$, consider the operator $U_t$ on $ell^2(G)$ given by $(U_tx)(s)=x(t^-1s)$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $sin G$.



    Put $mathcalL(G)= U_tmid tin G''$. Consider the state $tau$ on $mathcalL(G)$ defined by $tau(T)=left langle Tdelta_e,delta_e right rangle$ for $Tin mathcalL(G)$.



    Problems



    1) Show that $tau(ST)=tau(TS)$ for all for all $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$.



    3) Show that any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary



    My answers:



    1) I am not sure about this part. If $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$, then we can write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ and $T=sum_tin Gbeta_tU_t$. Can I write the multiplication
    $$
    ST=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tU_sU_t
    $$

    where $gamma_s,t$'s are complex numbers in terms of $alpha$ and $beta$? If not, how would you write it mathematically? Assume that this is true. I have shown that $U_sU_t=U_st$ and $U_tdelta_s=delta_ts$. Then we have
    $$
    tau(ST)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,ttau(U_st)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle U_stdelta_e,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle delta_st,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_st(e)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_ts(e)=dots=tau(TS)
    $$

    Is this correct?



    I am not sure about the last problem. Could you help me with it? The problem 2) was as follows: Show that $tau(T^* T)=0$ implies $T=0$ for all $Tin mathcalL(G)$. I have solved this one. Just informing it if it is relevant for the last problem.



    Is some informations are missing, please let me know.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      Let $G$ be a countable group with neutral element $e$. Consider the Hilbert space $$ell^2(G):=left x(t)$$ with inner product $left langle x,y right rangle=sum_tin Gx(t)overliney(t)$ for $x,yin ell^2(G)$. For each $tin G$, let $delta_tin ell^2(G)$ be defined by $delta_t(t)=1$ and $delta_t(s)=0$ if $sneq t$. The set $(delta_t)_tin G$ is an orthonormal basis for $ell^2(G)$, and $x(t)=left langle x,delta_t right rangle$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $tin G$.



      For each $tin G$, consider the operator $U_t$ on $ell^2(G)$ given by $(U_tx)(s)=x(t^-1s)$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $sin G$.



      Put $mathcalL(G)= U_tmid tin G''$. Consider the state $tau$ on $mathcalL(G)$ defined by $tau(T)=left langle Tdelta_e,delta_e right rangle$ for $Tin mathcalL(G)$.



      Problems



      1) Show that $tau(ST)=tau(TS)$ for all for all $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$.



      3) Show that any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary



      My answers:



      1) I am not sure about this part. If $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$, then we can write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ and $T=sum_tin Gbeta_tU_t$. Can I write the multiplication
      $$
      ST=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tU_sU_t
      $$

      where $gamma_s,t$'s are complex numbers in terms of $alpha$ and $beta$? If not, how would you write it mathematically? Assume that this is true. I have shown that $U_sU_t=U_st$ and $U_tdelta_s=delta_ts$. Then we have
      $$
      tau(ST)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,ttau(U_st)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle U_stdelta_e,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle delta_st,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_st(e)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_ts(e)=dots=tau(TS)
      $$

      Is this correct?



      I am not sure about the last problem. Could you help me with it? The problem 2) was as follows: Show that $tau(T^* T)=0$ implies $T=0$ for all $Tin mathcalL(G)$. I have solved this one. Just informing it if it is relevant for the last problem.



      Is some informations are missing, please let me know.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $G$ be a countable group with neutral element $e$. Consider the Hilbert space $$ell^2(G):=left x(t)$$ with inner product $left langle x,y right rangle=sum_tin Gx(t)overliney(t)$ for $x,yin ell^2(G)$. For each $tin G$, let $delta_tin ell^2(G)$ be defined by $delta_t(t)=1$ and $delta_t(s)=0$ if $sneq t$. The set $(delta_t)_tin G$ is an orthonormal basis for $ell^2(G)$, and $x(t)=left langle x,delta_t right rangle$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $tin G$.



      For each $tin G$, consider the operator $U_t$ on $ell^2(G)$ given by $(U_tx)(s)=x(t^-1s)$ for $xin ell^2(G)$ and $sin G$.



      Put $mathcalL(G)= U_tmid tin G''$. Consider the state $tau$ on $mathcalL(G)$ defined by $tau(T)=left langle Tdelta_e,delta_e right rangle$ for $Tin mathcalL(G)$.



      Problems



      1) Show that $tau(ST)=tau(TS)$ for all for all $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$.



      3) Show that any isometry in $mathcalL(G)$ must be a unitary



      My answers:



      1) I am not sure about this part. If $S,Tin mathcalL(G)$, then we can write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ and $T=sum_tin Gbeta_tU_t$. Can I write the multiplication
      $$
      ST=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tU_sU_t
      $$

      where $gamma_s,t$'s are complex numbers in terms of $alpha$ and $beta$? If not, how would you write it mathematically? Assume that this is true. I have shown that $U_sU_t=U_st$ and $U_tdelta_s=delta_ts$. Then we have
      $$
      tau(ST)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,ttau(U_st)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle U_stdelta_e,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,tleft langle delta_st,delta_e right rangle=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_st(e)=sum_(s,t)in Stimes Tgamma_s,t delta_ts(e)=dots=tau(TS)
      $$

      Is this correct?



      I am not sure about the last problem. Could you help me with it? The problem 2) was as follows: Show that $tau(T^* T)=0$ implies $T=0$ for all $Tin mathcalL(G)$. I have solved this one. Just informing it if it is relevant for the last problem.



      Is some informations are missing, please let me know.







      functional-analysis operator-algebras c-star-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 1 at 0:19









      Martin Argerami

      129k1184185




      129k1184185










      asked Mar 31 at 19:31









      UnknownWUnknownW

      1,045922




      1,045922




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.



          Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
          beginalign
          tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
          =sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
          =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
          &=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
          endalign



          For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
          $$
          tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
          $$

          Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 12:03










          • $begingroup$
            The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
            $endgroup$
            – Martin Argerami
            Apr 1 at 13:51










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 20:25











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169805%2fany-isometry-in-mathcallg-must-be-a-unitary%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.



          Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
          beginalign
          tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
          =sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
          =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
          &=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
          endalign



          For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
          $$
          tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
          $$

          Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 12:03










          • $begingroup$
            The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
            $endgroup$
            – Martin Argerami
            Apr 1 at 13:51










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 20:25















          0












          $begingroup$

          For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.



          Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
          beginalign
          tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
          =sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
          =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
          &=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
          endalign



          For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
          $$
          tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
          $$

          Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 12:03










          • $begingroup$
            The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
            $endgroup$
            – Martin Argerami
            Apr 1 at 13:51










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 20:25













          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.



          Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
          beginalign
          tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
          =sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
          =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
          &=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
          endalign



          For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
          $$
          tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
          $$

          Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          For part 1, the way you are doing looks problematic to me, because where your dots start you would have $sum_sgamma_s,s^-1$ and you need to relate them to the corresponding coefficients for $U_ts$.



          Rather, first note that it is enough to work with finite sums, since $tau$ is (obviously!) wot-continuous. With finite sums (and thus no need to worry about convergence) you have
          beginalign
          tau(ST)&=sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle U_stdelta_e,delta_erangle
          =sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle
          =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1\
          &=sum_talpha_t^-1beta_t=tau(TS).
          endalign



          For part 3, part 2 (which says that $tau$ is faithful) is the essential bit. If $S$ is an isometry, you have $S^*S=I$. Then
          $$
          tau(I-SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(SS^*)=tau(I)-tau(S^*S)=1-1=0.
          $$

          Note also that $SS^*leq I$, since it is positive and its norm is 1 (because $|SS^*|=|S^*|^2=|S|^2=|S^*S|=1$). Any positive element is of the form $T^*T$ for some $T$. So $I-SS^*=0$, and $SS^*=I$, making $S$ a unitary.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 31 at 23:40









          Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

          129k1184185




          129k1184185











          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 12:03










          • $begingroup$
            The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
            $endgroup$
            – Martin Argerami
            Apr 1 at 13:51










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 20:25
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 12:03










          • $begingroup$
            The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
            $endgroup$
            – Martin Argerami
            Apr 1 at 13:51










          • $begingroup$
            Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
            $endgroup$
            – UnknownW
            Apr 1 at 20:25















          $begingroup$
          Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
          $endgroup$
          – UnknownW
          Apr 1 at 12:03




          $begingroup$
          Thank you. Where does this come from $sum_s,t alpha_sbeta_tlangle delta_st,delta_erangle =sum_salpha_sbeta_s^-1$? Could you please elaborate a little more on the last paragraph?
          $endgroup$
          – UnknownW
          Apr 1 at 12:03












          $begingroup$
          The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
          $endgroup$
          – Martin Argerami
          Apr 1 at 13:51




          $begingroup$
          The only way for the inner product to be 1 (and not zero) is to have $st=e$.
          $endgroup$
          – Martin Argerami
          Apr 1 at 13:51












          $begingroup$
          Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
          $endgroup$
          – UnknownW
          Apr 1 at 20:25




          $begingroup$
          Okay, thank you. I have one last question: Is $S$ belongs to $mathcalL(G)$ would it be okay to write $S=sum_sin Galpha_sU_s$ or should it be written in another from?
          $endgroup$
          – UnknownW
          Apr 1 at 20:25

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169805%2fany-isometry-in-mathcallg-must-be-a-unitary%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

          Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

          Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ