Condition for the power series to have a single singularity on its circle of convergence Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)About the limit of the coefficient ratio for a power series over complex numbersfunction with isolated singularity on the unit circle and coefficients of its taylor expansionFinding the radius of convergence of the given power series.Find the radius of convergence for $sum^infty_n=0 a_nz^n!$Radius of convergence two power series (by using Cauchy test).Question about the proof of convergence of power series for complex numbersUniform convergence of a complex power series on a compact setAnalytic continuation of power series on the unit whose terms tends to 0Uniform Convergence of Power SeriesConvergence of a power series: general questionPower series is locally normally convergent in its convergence radius $B(0,R)$
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Array/tabular for long multiplication
What's the point in a preamp?
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
What's the difference between (size_t)-1 and ~0?
Can a monk deflect thrown melee weapons?
What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?
Why does tar appear to skip file contents when output file is /dev/null?
Can smartphones with the same camera sensor have different image quality?
Stars Make Stars
Direct Experience of Meditation
How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?
Active filter with series inductor and resistor - do these exist?
Passing functions in C++
How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?
Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments
Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?
Do we know why communications with Beresheet and NASA were lost during the attempted landing of the Moon lander?
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
Geometric mean and geometric standard deviation
Area of a 2D convex hull
Was credit for the black hole image misattributed?
Unexpected result with right shift after bitwise negation
New Order #5: where Fibonacci and Beatty meet at Wythoff
Condition for the power series to have a single singularity on its circle of convergence
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)About the limit of the coefficient ratio for a power series over complex numbersfunction with isolated singularity on the unit circle and coefficients of its taylor expansionFinding the radius of convergence of the given power series.Find the radius of convergence for $sum^infty_n=0 a_nz^n!$Radius of convergence two power series (by using Cauchy test).Question about the proof of convergence of power series for complex numbersUniform convergence of a complex power series on a compact setAnalytic continuation of power series on the unit whose terms tends to 0Uniform Convergence of Power SeriesConvergence of a power series: general questionPower series is locally normally convergent in its convergence radius $B(0,R)$
$begingroup$
I'm looking to the prove of the following statement:
If for the complex power series $sum^infty_i=1 a_i z^i$ it holds that
$$ limsup_n to infty sqrt[n]<1, $$
then $sum^infty_i=1a_nz^n$ converges to the holomorphic function $f$ inside the disc $D =D(0,|z_0|)$ and the only singularity is $z_0$.
In the context of this question by singularity I mean there is no such holomorphic function $varphi$ defined in some neighborhood $U$ of $z_0$ such that $f_U cap D = varphi_U cap D$.
It is easy to see that in case for any $c in mathbbR_++$
$$
left|left n in mathbbN : leftright| = infty,
$$
the limit superior will be not less then $1$:
$$ lim_ntoinftysup left| fraca_na_n+1 -z_0 right|^1/n ge
lim_n to infty sqrt[n]c = 1. $$
This is a contradiction, hence there must be a convergence
$$
lim_n to infty fraca_na_n+1 = z_0,
$$
implying that the radius of convergence for $sum^infty_n=0a_nz^n$ is indeed $|z_0|$.
However, I don't know how to prove that $z_0$ is a singularity and any other point of $partial D$ is not.
Help me to prove that $z_0$ is a singular point and the other points in $partial D$ are not.
p. s.
This question seems to be a converse to About the limit of the coefficient ratio for a power series over complex numbers
complex-analysis power-series singularity
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking to the prove of the following statement:
If for the complex power series $sum^infty_i=1 a_i z^i$ it holds that
$$ limsup_n to infty sqrt[n]<1, $$
then $sum^infty_i=1a_nz^n$ converges to the holomorphic function $f$ inside the disc $D =D(0,|z_0|)$ and the only singularity is $z_0$.
In the context of this question by singularity I mean there is no such holomorphic function $varphi$ defined in some neighborhood $U$ of $z_0$ such that $f_U cap D = varphi_U cap D$.
It is easy to see that in case for any $c in mathbbR_++$
$$
left|left n in mathbbN : leftright| = infty,
$$
the limit superior will be not less then $1$:
$$ lim_ntoinftysup left| fraca_na_n+1 -z_0 right|^1/n ge
lim_n to infty sqrt[n]c = 1. $$
This is a contradiction, hence there must be a convergence
$$
lim_n to infty fraca_na_n+1 = z_0,
$$
implying that the radius of convergence for $sum^infty_n=0a_nz^n$ is indeed $|z_0|$.
However, I don't know how to prove that $z_0$ is a singularity and any other point of $partial D$ is not.
Help me to prove that $z_0$ is a singular point and the other points in $partial D$ are not.
p. s.
This question seems to be a converse to About the limit of the coefficient ratio for a power series over complex numbers
complex-analysis power-series singularity
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking to the prove of the following statement:
If for the complex power series $sum^infty_i=1 a_i z^i$ it holds that
$$ limsup_n to infty sqrt[n]<1, $$
then $sum^infty_i=1a_nz^n$ converges to the holomorphic function $f$ inside the disc $D =D(0,|z_0|)$ and the only singularity is $z_0$.
In the context of this question by singularity I mean there is no such holomorphic function $varphi$ defined in some neighborhood $U$ of $z_0$ such that $f_U cap D = varphi_U cap D$.
It is easy to see that in case for any $c in mathbbR_++$
$$
left|left n in mathbbN : leftright| = infty,
$$
the limit superior will be not less then $1$:
$$ lim_ntoinftysup left| fraca_na_n+1 -z_0 right|^1/n ge
lim_n to infty sqrt[n]c = 1. $$
This is a contradiction, hence there must be a convergence
$$
lim_n to infty fraca_na_n+1 = z_0,
$$
implying that the radius of convergence for $sum^infty_n=0a_nz^n$ is indeed $|z_0|$.
However, I don't know how to prove that $z_0$ is a singularity and any other point of $partial D$ is not.
Help me to prove that $z_0$ is a singular point and the other points in $partial D$ are not.
p. s.
This question seems to be a converse to About the limit of the coefficient ratio for a power series over complex numbers
complex-analysis power-series singularity
$endgroup$
I'm looking to the prove of the following statement:
If for the complex power series $sum^infty_i=1 a_i z^i$ it holds that
$$ limsup_n to infty sqrt[n]<1, $$
then $sum^infty_i=1a_nz^n$ converges to the holomorphic function $f$ inside the disc $D =D(0,|z_0|)$ and the only singularity is $z_0$.
In the context of this question by singularity I mean there is no such holomorphic function $varphi$ defined in some neighborhood $U$ of $z_0$ such that $f_U cap D = varphi_U cap D$.
It is easy to see that in case for any $c in mathbbR_++$
$$
left|left n in mathbbN : leftright| = infty,
$$
the limit superior will be not less then $1$:
$$ lim_ntoinftysup left| fraca_na_n+1 -z_0 right|^1/n ge
lim_n to infty sqrt[n]c = 1. $$
This is a contradiction, hence there must be a convergence
$$
lim_n to infty fraca_na_n+1 = z_0,
$$
implying that the radius of convergence for $sum^infty_n=0a_nz^n$ is indeed $|z_0|$.
However, I don't know how to prove that $z_0$ is a singularity and any other point of $partial D$ is not.
Help me to prove that $z_0$ is a singular point and the other points in $partial D$ are not.
p. s.
This question seems to be a converse to About the limit of the coefficient ratio for a power series over complex numbers
complex-analysis power-series singularity
complex-analysis power-series singularity
edited Apr 5 at 21:24
Nik Pronko
asked Mar 31 at 18:59
Nik PronkoNik Pronko
883920
883920
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think I got it:
The series define holomorphic function $f(z) = sum^infty_n=0a_n z^n$ inside the disc $D =D(0,|z_0|)$. Consider the function $g(z) = (z - z_0)f(z)$. It can be expanded at the $0$ as $g(z) = -z_0a_0 + sum^infty_n=1(a_n-1 - z_0a_n)z^n$. Then it is possible to estimate a limit:
$$
limsup_n to inftysqrt[n]a_n-1 - z_0a_n =
limsup_ntoinfty sqrt[n]sqrt[n]left <
|z_0|^-1
$$
as it is known from before that $lim_ntoinftysup sqrt[n] = |z_0|^-1$. Hence, $g(z)$ is holomorphic inside the disc with the radius extending over the one of $D$. This is enough to claim that the series $sum^infty_n=1a_nz_n$ has only a 1st order pole in $z_0$ and regular point everywhere else on $partial D$, because function $varphi(z) = fracg(z)z - z_0$ will work as a sufficient analytic extension.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169775%2fcondition-for-the-power-series-to-have-a-single-singularity-on-its-circle-of-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think I got it:
The series define holomorphic function $f(z) = sum^infty_n=0a_n z^n$ inside the disc $D =D(0,|z_0|)$. Consider the function $g(z) = (z - z_0)f(z)$. It can be expanded at the $0$ as $g(z) = -z_0a_0 + sum^infty_n=1(a_n-1 - z_0a_n)z^n$. Then it is possible to estimate a limit:
$$
limsup_n to inftysqrt[n]a_n-1 - z_0a_n =
limsup_ntoinfty sqrt[n]sqrt[n]left <
|z_0|^-1
$$
as it is known from before that $lim_ntoinftysup sqrt[n] = |z_0|^-1$. Hence, $g(z)$ is holomorphic inside the disc with the radius extending over the one of $D$. This is enough to claim that the series $sum^infty_n=1a_nz_n$ has only a 1st order pole in $z_0$ and regular point everywhere else on $partial D$, because function $varphi(z) = fracg(z)z - z_0$ will work as a sufficient analytic extension.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I got it:
The series define holomorphic function $f(z) = sum^infty_n=0a_n z^n$ inside the disc $D =D(0,|z_0|)$. Consider the function $g(z) = (z - z_0)f(z)$. It can be expanded at the $0$ as $g(z) = -z_0a_0 + sum^infty_n=1(a_n-1 - z_0a_n)z^n$. Then it is possible to estimate a limit:
$$
limsup_n to inftysqrt[n]a_n-1 - z_0a_n =
limsup_ntoinfty sqrt[n]sqrt[n]left <
|z_0|^-1
$$
as it is known from before that $lim_ntoinftysup sqrt[n] = |z_0|^-1$. Hence, $g(z)$ is holomorphic inside the disc with the radius extending over the one of $D$. This is enough to claim that the series $sum^infty_n=1a_nz_n$ has only a 1st order pole in $z_0$ and regular point everywhere else on $partial D$, because function $varphi(z) = fracg(z)z - z_0$ will work as a sufficient analytic extension.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I got it:
The series define holomorphic function $f(z) = sum^infty_n=0a_n z^n$ inside the disc $D =D(0,|z_0|)$. Consider the function $g(z) = (z - z_0)f(z)$. It can be expanded at the $0$ as $g(z) = -z_0a_0 + sum^infty_n=1(a_n-1 - z_0a_n)z^n$. Then it is possible to estimate a limit:
$$
limsup_n to inftysqrt[n]a_n-1 - z_0a_n =
limsup_ntoinfty sqrt[n]sqrt[n]left <
|z_0|^-1
$$
as it is known from before that $lim_ntoinftysup sqrt[n] = |z_0|^-1$. Hence, $g(z)$ is holomorphic inside the disc with the radius extending over the one of $D$. This is enough to claim that the series $sum^infty_n=1a_nz_n$ has only a 1st order pole in $z_0$ and regular point everywhere else on $partial D$, because function $varphi(z) = fracg(z)z - z_0$ will work as a sufficient analytic extension.
$endgroup$
I think I got it:
The series define holomorphic function $f(z) = sum^infty_n=0a_n z^n$ inside the disc $D =D(0,|z_0|)$. Consider the function $g(z) = (z - z_0)f(z)$. It can be expanded at the $0$ as $g(z) = -z_0a_0 + sum^infty_n=1(a_n-1 - z_0a_n)z^n$. Then it is possible to estimate a limit:
$$
limsup_n to inftysqrt[n]a_n-1 - z_0a_n =
limsup_ntoinfty sqrt[n]sqrt[n]left <
|z_0|^-1
$$
as it is known from before that $lim_ntoinftysup sqrt[n] = |z_0|^-1$. Hence, $g(z)$ is holomorphic inside the disc with the radius extending over the one of $D$. This is enough to claim that the series $sum^infty_n=1a_nz_n$ has only a 1st order pole in $z_0$ and regular point everywhere else on $partial D$, because function $varphi(z) = fracg(z)z - z_0$ will work as a sufficient analytic extension.
edited Apr 5 at 20:19
answered Apr 5 at 20:12
Nik PronkoNik Pronko
883920
883920
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169775%2fcondition-for-the-power-series-to-have-a-single-singularity-on-its-circle-of-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown