How would I convert this discrete math statement from logic/equation to English?What sort of math is this, and how would I solve it?How to logically analyze the statement: “Nobody in the calculus class is smarter than everybody in the discrete math class.”Converting to englishTranslating unless in logic to Englishfirst-order predicate calculusProve that all solutions to the equation x² = x +1 are irrationalHow do I translate sentences from English to predicate logic?Translations from English to Language of Predicate Logic (PL)Prove that the cardinality of the set of rational numbers and the set of integers is equalIf A, B, and C are Boolean variables, which of the following statements are true?

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

What killed these X2 caps?

If a Gelatinous Cube takes up the entire space of a Pit Trap, what happens when a creature falls into the trap but succeeds on the saving throw?

In a Spin are Both Wings Stalled?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Would Slavery Reparations be considered Bills of Attainder and hence Illegal?

Anagram holiday

In Romance of the Three Kingdoms why do people still use bamboo sticks when papers are already invented?

Arrow those variables!

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

Could gravitational lensing be used to protect a spaceship from a laser?

I would say: "You are another teacher", but she is a woman and I am a man

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets

Alternative to sending password over mail?

Western buddy movie with a supernatural twist where a woman turns into an eagle at the end

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

90's TV series where a boy goes to another dimension through portal near power lines

Why is Collection not simply treated as Collection<?>

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

What do you call someone who asks many questions?



How would I convert this discrete math statement from logic/equation to English?


What sort of math is this, and how would I solve it?How to logically analyze the statement: “Nobody in the calculus class is smarter than everybody in the discrete math class.”Converting to englishTranslating unless in logic to Englishfirst-order predicate calculusProve that all solutions to the equation x² = x +1 are irrationalHow do I translate sentences from English to predicate logic?Translations from English to Language of Predicate Logic (PL)Prove that the cardinality of the set of rational numbers and the set of integers is equalIf A, B, and C are Boolean variables, which of the following statements are true?













2












$begingroup$


Given that



  • $B(x)$ means "$x$ is a bear",


  • $F(x)$ means "$x$ is a fish", and


  • $E(x,y)$ means "$x$ eats $y$",


what is the best English translation of



$forall x[F(x)rightarrow forall y(E(y,x)rightarrow B(y))]$ ?



How can I do solve this? I got "Every fish is eaten by some bear", but that is not the answer. I'm not entirely sure how to go about this since I am fairly new to Discrete Math. Any help is greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    “All predators of fish are bears” or “Every animal that eats fish must be a bear” are fair enough.
    $endgroup$
    – mjtsquared
    Mar 29 at 2:36










  • $begingroup$
    So how would you say "Every bear eats fish?"
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 29 at 3:26










  • $begingroup$
    That’s not a correct simplification. Bears being the only animals that eat fish doesn’t always mean that all bears eat fish.
    $endgroup$
    – mjtsquared
    Mar 29 at 4:36
















2












$begingroup$


Given that



  • $B(x)$ means "$x$ is a bear",


  • $F(x)$ means "$x$ is a fish", and


  • $E(x,y)$ means "$x$ eats $y$",


what is the best English translation of



$forall x[F(x)rightarrow forall y(E(y,x)rightarrow B(y))]$ ?



How can I do solve this? I got "Every fish is eaten by some bear", but that is not the answer. I'm not entirely sure how to go about this since I am fairly new to Discrete Math. Any help is greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    “All predators of fish are bears” or “Every animal that eats fish must be a bear” are fair enough.
    $endgroup$
    – mjtsquared
    Mar 29 at 2:36










  • $begingroup$
    So how would you say "Every bear eats fish?"
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 29 at 3:26










  • $begingroup$
    That’s not a correct simplification. Bears being the only animals that eat fish doesn’t always mean that all bears eat fish.
    $endgroup$
    – mjtsquared
    Mar 29 at 4:36














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Given that



  • $B(x)$ means "$x$ is a bear",


  • $F(x)$ means "$x$ is a fish", and


  • $E(x,y)$ means "$x$ eats $y$",


what is the best English translation of



$forall x[F(x)rightarrow forall y(E(y,x)rightarrow B(y))]$ ?



How can I do solve this? I got "Every fish is eaten by some bear", but that is not the answer. I'm not entirely sure how to go about this since I am fairly new to Discrete Math. Any help is greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Given that



  • $B(x)$ means "$x$ is a bear",


  • $F(x)$ means "$x$ is a fish", and


  • $E(x,y)$ means "$x$ eats $y$",


what is the best English translation of



$forall x[F(x)rightarrow forall y(E(y,x)rightarrow B(y))]$ ?



How can I do solve this? I got "Every fish is eaten by some bear", but that is not the answer. I'm not entirely sure how to go about this since I am fairly new to Discrete Math. Any help is greatly appreciated.







discrete-mathematics logic quantifiers logic-translation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 29 at 6:04









Taroccoesbrocco

5,73671840




5,73671840










asked Mar 29 at 2:24









GrayGray

183




183











  • $begingroup$
    “All predators of fish are bears” or “Every animal that eats fish must be a bear” are fair enough.
    $endgroup$
    – mjtsquared
    Mar 29 at 2:36










  • $begingroup$
    So how would you say "Every bear eats fish?"
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 29 at 3:26










  • $begingroup$
    That’s not a correct simplification. Bears being the only animals that eat fish doesn’t always mean that all bears eat fish.
    $endgroup$
    – mjtsquared
    Mar 29 at 4:36

















  • $begingroup$
    “All predators of fish are bears” or “Every animal that eats fish must be a bear” are fair enough.
    $endgroup$
    – mjtsquared
    Mar 29 at 2:36










  • $begingroup$
    So how would you say "Every bear eats fish?"
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 29 at 3:26










  • $begingroup$
    That’s not a correct simplification. Bears being the only animals that eat fish doesn’t always mean that all bears eat fish.
    $endgroup$
    – mjtsquared
    Mar 29 at 4:36
















$begingroup$
“All predators of fish are bears” or “Every animal that eats fish must be a bear” are fair enough.
$endgroup$
– mjtsquared
Mar 29 at 2:36




$begingroup$
“All predators of fish are bears” or “Every animal that eats fish must be a bear” are fair enough.
$endgroup$
– mjtsquared
Mar 29 at 2:36












$begingroup$
So how would you say "Every bear eats fish?"
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 29 at 3:26




$begingroup$
So how would you say "Every bear eats fish?"
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 29 at 3:26












$begingroup$
That’s not a correct simplification. Bears being the only animals that eat fish doesn’t always mean that all bears eat fish.
$endgroup$
– mjtsquared
Mar 29 at 4:36





$begingroup$
That’s not a correct simplification. Bears being the only animals that eat fish doesn’t always mean that all bears eat fish.
$endgroup$
– mjtsquared
Mar 29 at 4:36











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

$forall x~(F(x)toforall y~(E(y,x)to B(y))$



$forall x~(xtext is a fishtoforall y~(ytext eats $x$to ytext is a bear))$



"If any fish is eaten by anything, then that thing is a bear."



Which I'd simplify to "Only bears eat fish."






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    It translates as : "For every fish, it is true that for anything that eats that fish, it is a bear". So ... this means that every fish only gets eaten by bears, i.e. That there is not anything that is not a bear that eats fish.



    In short ... and colloquial English: Fish only get eaten by bears.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      So, from the statements "Bears eat only fish", "Every bear eats fish", and "Only bears eat fish" the most correct would be: Only bears eat fish"?
      $endgroup$
      – Gray
      Mar 29 at 2:41










    • $begingroup$
      @Gray Actually, of those three, the latter one is the only correct one!
      $endgroup$
      – Bram28
      Mar 29 at 13:51











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3166658%2fhow-would-i-convert-this-discrete-math-statement-from-logic-equation-to-english%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    $forall x~(F(x)toforall y~(E(y,x)to B(y))$



    $forall x~(xtext is a fishtoforall y~(ytext eats $x$to ytext is a bear))$



    "If any fish is eaten by anything, then that thing is a bear."



    Which I'd simplify to "Only bears eat fish."






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      $forall x~(F(x)toforall y~(E(y,x)to B(y))$



      $forall x~(xtext is a fishtoforall y~(ytext eats $x$to ytext is a bear))$



      "If any fish is eaten by anything, then that thing is a bear."



      Which I'd simplify to "Only bears eat fish."






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        $forall x~(F(x)toforall y~(E(y,x)to B(y))$



        $forall x~(xtext is a fishtoforall y~(ytext eats $x$to ytext is a bear))$



        "If any fish is eaten by anything, then that thing is a bear."



        Which I'd simplify to "Only bears eat fish."






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $forall x~(F(x)toforall y~(E(y,x)to B(y))$



        $forall x~(xtext is a fishtoforall y~(ytext eats $x$to ytext is a bear))$



        "If any fish is eaten by anything, then that thing is a bear."



        Which I'd simplify to "Only bears eat fish."







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 29 at 2:59









        Graham KempGraham Kemp

        87.7k43578




        87.7k43578





















            1












            $begingroup$

            It translates as : "For every fish, it is true that for anything that eats that fish, it is a bear". So ... this means that every fish only gets eaten by bears, i.e. That there is not anything that is not a bear that eats fish.



            In short ... and colloquial English: Fish only get eaten by bears.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              So, from the statements "Bears eat only fish", "Every bear eats fish", and "Only bears eat fish" the most correct would be: Only bears eat fish"?
              $endgroup$
              – Gray
              Mar 29 at 2:41










            • $begingroup$
              @Gray Actually, of those three, the latter one is the only correct one!
              $endgroup$
              – Bram28
              Mar 29 at 13:51















            1












            $begingroup$

            It translates as : "For every fish, it is true that for anything that eats that fish, it is a bear". So ... this means that every fish only gets eaten by bears, i.e. That there is not anything that is not a bear that eats fish.



            In short ... and colloquial English: Fish only get eaten by bears.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              So, from the statements "Bears eat only fish", "Every bear eats fish", and "Only bears eat fish" the most correct would be: Only bears eat fish"?
              $endgroup$
              – Gray
              Mar 29 at 2:41










            • $begingroup$
              @Gray Actually, of those three, the latter one is the only correct one!
              $endgroup$
              – Bram28
              Mar 29 at 13:51













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            It translates as : "For every fish, it is true that for anything that eats that fish, it is a bear". So ... this means that every fish only gets eaten by bears, i.e. That there is not anything that is not a bear that eats fish.



            In short ... and colloquial English: Fish only get eaten by bears.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            It translates as : "For every fish, it is true that for anything that eats that fish, it is a bear". So ... this means that every fish only gets eaten by bears, i.e. That there is not anything that is not a bear that eats fish.



            In short ... and colloquial English: Fish only get eaten by bears.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 29 at 2:35









            Bram28Bram28

            64.2k44793




            64.2k44793







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              So, from the statements "Bears eat only fish", "Every bear eats fish", and "Only bears eat fish" the most correct would be: Only bears eat fish"?
              $endgroup$
              – Gray
              Mar 29 at 2:41










            • $begingroup$
              @Gray Actually, of those three, the latter one is the only correct one!
              $endgroup$
              – Bram28
              Mar 29 at 13:51












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              So, from the statements "Bears eat only fish", "Every bear eats fish", and "Only bears eat fish" the most correct would be: Only bears eat fish"?
              $endgroup$
              – Gray
              Mar 29 at 2:41










            • $begingroup$
              @Gray Actually, of those three, the latter one is the only correct one!
              $endgroup$
              – Bram28
              Mar 29 at 13:51







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            So, from the statements "Bears eat only fish", "Every bear eats fish", and "Only bears eat fish" the most correct would be: Only bears eat fish"?
            $endgroup$
            – Gray
            Mar 29 at 2:41




            $begingroup$
            So, from the statements "Bears eat only fish", "Every bear eats fish", and "Only bears eat fish" the most correct would be: Only bears eat fish"?
            $endgroup$
            – Gray
            Mar 29 at 2:41












            $begingroup$
            @Gray Actually, of those three, the latter one is the only correct one!
            $endgroup$
            – Bram28
            Mar 29 at 13:51




            $begingroup$
            @Gray Actually, of those three, the latter one is the only correct one!
            $endgroup$
            – Bram28
            Mar 29 at 13:51

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3166658%2fhow-would-i-convert-this-discrete-math-statement-from-logic-equation-to-english%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

            Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

            Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ