In three dimensional euclidean space, can we take projection of a plane onto a plane The Next CEO of Stack Overflowproving parallel projection is ontoOrthogonal direct sum decomposition and projectionsmapping / projection onto axisvector projection onto a planeRange of Projection Matrix over Vector SpaceHow can I project a vector onto a plane from a particular perspective?Finding a projection matrix onto the $xz$-plane.Find the matrix for the linear projection onto a subspace with respect to the direct sum of the two subspacesOrthogonal projection of point onto line/planemapping of orthogonal projection onto a plane

how one can write a nice vector parser, something that does pgfvecparseA=B-C; D=E x F;

Lucky Feat: How can "more than one creature spend a luck point to influence the outcome of a roll"?

Which Pokemon have a special animation when running with them out of their pokeball?

Getting Stale Gas Out of a Gas Tank w/out Dropping the Tank

Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?

Film where the government was corrupt with aliens, people sent to kill aliens are given rigged visors not showing the right aliens

Asymptote: 3d graph over a disc

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

Do I need to write [sic] when including a quotation with a number less than 10 that isn't written out?

Computationally populating tables with probability data

Can I board the first leg of the flight without having final country's visa?

Audio Conversion With ADS1243

What's the commands of Cisco query bgp neighbor table, bgp table and router table?

Cannot shrink btrfs filesystem although there is still data and metadata space left : ERROR: unable to resize '/home': No space left on device

Aggressive Under-Indexing and no data for missing index

What CSS properties can the br tag have?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Inductor and Capacitor in Parallel

Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Why do we say 'Un seul M' and not 'Une seule M' even though M is a "consonne"

The Ultimate Number Sequence Puzzle

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

What difference does it make using sed with/without whitespaces?



In three dimensional euclidean space, can we take projection of a plane onto a plane



The Next CEO of Stack Overflowproving parallel projection is ontoOrthogonal direct sum decomposition and projectionsmapping / projection onto axisvector projection onto a planeRange of Projection Matrix over Vector SpaceHow can I project a vector onto a plane from a particular perspective?Finding a projection matrix onto the $xz$-plane.Find the matrix for the linear projection onto a subspace with respect to the direct sum of the two subspacesOrthogonal projection of point onto line/planemapping of orthogonal projection onto a plane










0












$begingroup$


I was reading about projection mapping in linear algebra between finite dimensional vector spaces. There were given a condition that my space should be written as direct sum of two of its subspaces V and W to define projection onto V along W. Now my question is



  • we can take projections of x=y plane in yz plane in 3D euclidean geometry, this case after x=y would be precisely yz plane.


  • But as per our definition of projection mapping, R^3 should be writen as direct sum of x=y plane and xz plane, but here is not so.


  • Are they means different projections? I mean in euclidean 3D geometry we can take projections of plane onto a plane, but here in the definition of linear algebra about projection we cant take like this in 3D.


  • So are not they denotes same projection?


May be my concepts are not clear at all. Please help me to clear out. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Dude, you should work on your English. The last two points are completely non-understandable (at least to me).
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 28 at 4:03










  • $begingroup$
    @amsmath I hope you are now comfortable in my last two lines. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. If the answer is know to you please submit in answer section. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – user639336
    Mar 28 at 4:10










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to take another look at the definition of ”direct sum.”
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Mar 28 at 4:50










  • $begingroup$
    @amd sir I cant understand what you want to mean.
    $endgroup$
    – user639336
    Mar 28 at 4:51










  • $begingroup$
    A three-dimensional space cannot be the direct sum of a pair of its two-dimensional subspaces.
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Mar 28 at 4:52















0












$begingroup$


I was reading about projection mapping in linear algebra between finite dimensional vector spaces. There were given a condition that my space should be written as direct sum of two of its subspaces V and W to define projection onto V along W. Now my question is



  • we can take projections of x=y plane in yz plane in 3D euclidean geometry, this case after x=y would be precisely yz plane.


  • But as per our definition of projection mapping, R^3 should be writen as direct sum of x=y plane and xz plane, but here is not so.


  • Are they means different projections? I mean in euclidean 3D geometry we can take projections of plane onto a plane, but here in the definition of linear algebra about projection we cant take like this in 3D.


  • So are not they denotes same projection?


May be my concepts are not clear at all. Please help me to clear out. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Dude, you should work on your English. The last two points are completely non-understandable (at least to me).
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 28 at 4:03










  • $begingroup$
    @amsmath I hope you are now comfortable in my last two lines. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. If the answer is know to you please submit in answer section. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – user639336
    Mar 28 at 4:10










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to take another look at the definition of ”direct sum.”
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Mar 28 at 4:50










  • $begingroup$
    @amd sir I cant understand what you want to mean.
    $endgroup$
    – user639336
    Mar 28 at 4:51










  • $begingroup$
    A three-dimensional space cannot be the direct sum of a pair of its two-dimensional subspaces.
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Mar 28 at 4:52













0












0








0





$begingroup$


I was reading about projection mapping in linear algebra between finite dimensional vector spaces. There were given a condition that my space should be written as direct sum of two of its subspaces V and W to define projection onto V along W. Now my question is



  • we can take projections of x=y plane in yz plane in 3D euclidean geometry, this case after x=y would be precisely yz plane.


  • But as per our definition of projection mapping, R^3 should be writen as direct sum of x=y plane and xz plane, but here is not so.


  • Are they means different projections? I mean in euclidean 3D geometry we can take projections of plane onto a plane, but here in the definition of linear algebra about projection we cant take like this in 3D.


  • So are not they denotes same projection?


May be my concepts are not clear at all. Please help me to clear out. Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was reading about projection mapping in linear algebra between finite dimensional vector spaces. There were given a condition that my space should be written as direct sum of two of its subspaces V and W to define projection onto V along W. Now my question is



  • we can take projections of x=y plane in yz plane in 3D euclidean geometry, this case after x=y would be precisely yz plane.


  • But as per our definition of projection mapping, R^3 should be writen as direct sum of x=y plane and xz plane, but here is not so.


  • Are they means different projections? I mean in euclidean 3D geometry we can take projections of plane onto a plane, but here in the definition of linear algebra about projection we cant take like this in 3D.


  • So are not they denotes same projection?


May be my concepts are not clear at all. Please help me to clear out. Thanks in advance.







linear-algebra euclidean-geometry projection






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 4:09







user639336

















asked Mar 28 at 3:56









user639336user639336

124




124











  • $begingroup$
    Dude, you should work on your English. The last two points are completely non-understandable (at least to me).
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 28 at 4:03










  • $begingroup$
    @amsmath I hope you are now comfortable in my last two lines. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. If the answer is know to you please submit in answer section. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – user639336
    Mar 28 at 4:10










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to take another look at the definition of ”direct sum.”
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Mar 28 at 4:50










  • $begingroup$
    @amd sir I cant understand what you want to mean.
    $endgroup$
    – user639336
    Mar 28 at 4:51










  • $begingroup$
    A three-dimensional space cannot be the direct sum of a pair of its two-dimensional subspaces.
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Mar 28 at 4:52
















  • $begingroup$
    Dude, you should work on your English. The last two points are completely non-understandable (at least to me).
    $endgroup$
    – amsmath
    Mar 28 at 4:03










  • $begingroup$
    @amsmath I hope you are now comfortable in my last two lines. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. If the answer is know to you please submit in answer section. Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – user639336
    Mar 28 at 4:10










  • $begingroup$
    You might want to take another look at the definition of ”direct sum.”
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Mar 28 at 4:50










  • $begingroup$
    @amd sir I cant understand what you want to mean.
    $endgroup$
    – user639336
    Mar 28 at 4:51










  • $begingroup$
    A three-dimensional space cannot be the direct sum of a pair of its two-dimensional subspaces.
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Mar 28 at 4:52















$begingroup$
Dude, you should work on your English. The last two points are completely non-understandable (at least to me).
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 28 at 4:03




$begingroup$
Dude, you should work on your English. The last two points are completely non-understandable (at least to me).
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Mar 28 at 4:03












$begingroup$
@amsmath I hope you are now comfortable in my last two lines. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. If the answer is know to you please submit in answer section. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– user639336
Mar 28 at 4:10




$begingroup$
@amsmath I hope you are now comfortable in my last two lines. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. If the answer is know to you please submit in answer section. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– user639336
Mar 28 at 4:10












$begingroup$
You might want to take another look at the definition of ”direct sum.”
$endgroup$
– amd
Mar 28 at 4:50




$begingroup$
You might want to take another look at the definition of ”direct sum.”
$endgroup$
– amd
Mar 28 at 4:50












$begingroup$
@amd sir I cant understand what you want to mean.
$endgroup$
– user639336
Mar 28 at 4:51




$begingroup$
@amd sir I cant understand what you want to mean.
$endgroup$
– user639336
Mar 28 at 4:51












$begingroup$
A three-dimensional space cannot be the direct sum of a pair of its two-dimensional subspaces.
$endgroup$
– amd
Mar 28 at 4:52




$begingroup$
A three-dimensional space cannot be the direct sum of a pair of its two-dimensional subspaces.
$endgroup$
– amd
Mar 28 at 4:52










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165453%2fin-three-dimensional-euclidean-space-can-we-take-projection-of-a-plane-onto-a-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165453%2fin-three-dimensional-euclidean-space-can-we-take-projection-of-a-plane-onto-a-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Triangular numbers and gcdProving sum of a set is $0 pmod n$ if $n$ is odd, or $fracn2 pmod n$ if $n$ is even?Is greatest common divisor of two numbers really their smallest linear combination?GCD, LCM RelationshipProve a set of nonnegative integers with greatest common divisor 1 and closed under addition has all but finite many nonnegative integers.all pairs of a and b in an equation containing gcdTriangular Numbers Modulo $k$ - Hit All Values?Understanding the Existence and Uniqueness of the GCDGCD and LCM with logical symbolsThe greatest common divisor of two positive integers less than 100 is equal to 3. Their least common multiple is twelve times one of the integers.Suppose that for all integers $x$, $x|a$ and $x|b$ if and only if $x|c$. Then $c = gcd(a,b)$Which is the gcd of 2 numbers which are multiplied and the result is 600000?

Ingelân Ynhâld Etymology | Geografy | Skiednis | Polityk en bestjoer | Ekonomy | Demografy | Kultuer | Klimaat | Sjoch ek | Keppelings om utens | Boarnen, noaten en referinsjes Navigaasjemenuwww.gov.ukOffisjele webside fan it regear fan it Feriene KeninkrykOffisjele webside fan it Britske FerkearsburoNederlânsktalige ynformaasje fan it Britske FerkearsburoOffisjele webside fan English Heritage, de organisaasje dy't him ynset foar it behâld fan it Ingelske kultuergoedYnwennertallen fan alle Britske stêden út 'e folkstelling fan 2011Notes en References, op dizze sideEngland

Հադիս Բովանդակություն Անվանում և նշանակություն | Դասակարգում | Աղբյուրներ | Նավարկման ցանկ