Real Analysis, Problem 3.2.14 The Radon Nikodym Theorem The Next CEO of Stack OverflowRadon–Nikodym derivative and “normal” derivativeCalculating Radon Nikodym derivativeRadon–Nikodym theorem: special caseA counter-example to Radon-Nikodym Theorem?Absolute continuity and Radon-Nikodym derivativeIs $sigma$-finiteness unnecessary for Radon Nikodym theorem?Lebesgue–Radon–Nikodym Theorem ExplanationReal Analysis, Folland Corollary 3.6, The Lebesgue-Radon-Nikodym TheoremWeakening the “positive $mu$” condition in Radon-Nikodym theoremCorollary of Radon-Nikodym theorem

What is the difference between 'contrib' and 'non-free' packages repositories?

Is it OK to decorate a log book cover?

Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?

Is it correct to say moon starry nights?

How does a dynamic QR code work?

MT "will strike" & LXX "will watch carefully" (Gen 3:15)?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

How can the PCs determine if an item is a phylactery?

Why did early computer designers eschew integers?

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

Incomplete cube

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?

What did the word "leisure" mean in late 18th Century usage?

Is a linearly independent set whose span is dense a Schauder basis?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Which acid/base does a strong base/acid react when added to a buffer solution?

Early programmable calculators with RS-232

Can I cast Thunderwave and be at the center of its bottom face, but not be affected by it?

Direct Implications Between USA and UK in Event of No-Deal Brexit

pgfplots: How to draw a tangent graph below two others?

Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?

Creating a script with console commands



Real Analysis, Problem 3.2.14 The Radon Nikodym Theorem



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowRadon–Nikodym derivative and “normal” derivativeCalculating Radon Nikodym derivativeRadon–Nikodym theorem: special caseA counter-example to Radon-Nikodym Theorem?Absolute continuity and Radon-Nikodym derivativeIs $sigma$-finiteness unnecessary for Radon Nikodym theorem?Lebesgue–Radon–Nikodym Theorem ExplanationReal Analysis, Folland Corollary 3.6, The Lebesgue-Radon-Nikodym TheoremWeakening the “positive $mu$” condition in Radon-Nikodym theoremCorollary of Radon-Nikodym theorem










2












$begingroup$



Problem 3.3.14 - If $nu$ is an arbitrary signed measure and $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$. Hints:



a.) It suffices to assume that $mu$ is finite and $nu$ is positive.



b.) With these assumptions, there exists an $Ein M$ that is $sigma$-finite for $nu$ such that $mu(E)geq mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.



c.) The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies on $E$. If $Fcap E = emptyset$, then either $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$ or $mu(F) > 0$ and $|nu(F)| = infty$.




Attempted proof - Consider $mu(E)$ where $E$ is a $sigma$-finite set for $nu$. Since we have that $mu$ is finite then clearly $mu(E)$ must be bounded which implies it has a supremum. We will define the supremum as $$L = supF: F textis sigma-textfinite for nu$$
Now lets take a sequence $E_n_1^infty$ that are $sigma$-finite with respect to $nu$ and $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ as $nrightarrow infty$. Now let $$E = bigcup_1^inftyE_n$$ then $mu(E) leq L$ since it is taken to be a countable union of $sigma$-finite sets. On the other hand, $mu(E)geq mu(E_n)$ for all $n$ and since $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ then $mu(E) = L$. Now since $mu(E) = L$ then clearly by definition of $L$ we have that $mu(E) > mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$. Now we apply the Radon-Nikodym theorem: so, suppose that $Fcap E = emptyset$ well since $nullmu$ then by definition $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$. If $mu(F) > 0$ then for sake of contradiction suppose $|nu(F)|neq infty$. Then since $mu$ is finite $mu(Fcup E) > mu(E)$ then this implies that $Ecup F$ is not $sigma$-finite since a $sigma$-finite set with a union of a finite set is $sigma$-finite. Therefore $|nu(F)| = infty$.



Thus I believe we can refer to Radon-Nikidym theorem to conclude that there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$.



I am not sure if this is completely correct, any suggestions is greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you're still not able to decide on your own whether your analysis proofs are correct, even after asking literally dozens of these proof-verification questions, you have much deeper issues that need to be resolved with your faculty / tutor/ mentor. Not a website.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jul 15 '16 at 23:10















2












$begingroup$



Problem 3.3.14 - If $nu$ is an arbitrary signed measure and $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$. Hints:



a.) It suffices to assume that $mu$ is finite and $nu$ is positive.



b.) With these assumptions, there exists an $Ein M$ that is $sigma$-finite for $nu$ such that $mu(E)geq mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.



c.) The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies on $E$. If $Fcap E = emptyset$, then either $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$ or $mu(F) > 0$ and $|nu(F)| = infty$.




Attempted proof - Consider $mu(E)$ where $E$ is a $sigma$-finite set for $nu$. Since we have that $mu$ is finite then clearly $mu(E)$ must be bounded which implies it has a supremum. We will define the supremum as $$L = supF: F textis sigma-textfinite for nu$$
Now lets take a sequence $E_n_1^infty$ that are $sigma$-finite with respect to $nu$ and $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ as $nrightarrow infty$. Now let $$E = bigcup_1^inftyE_n$$ then $mu(E) leq L$ since it is taken to be a countable union of $sigma$-finite sets. On the other hand, $mu(E)geq mu(E_n)$ for all $n$ and since $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ then $mu(E) = L$. Now since $mu(E) = L$ then clearly by definition of $L$ we have that $mu(E) > mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$. Now we apply the Radon-Nikodym theorem: so, suppose that $Fcap E = emptyset$ well since $nullmu$ then by definition $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$. If $mu(F) > 0$ then for sake of contradiction suppose $|nu(F)|neq infty$. Then since $mu$ is finite $mu(Fcup E) > mu(E)$ then this implies that $Ecup F$ is not $sigma$-finite since a $sigma$-finite set with a union of a finite set is $sigma$-finite. Therefore $|nu(F)| = infty$.



Thus I believe we can refer to Radon-Nikidym theorem to conclude that there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$.



I am not sure if this is completely correct, any suggestions is greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you're still not able to decide on your own whether your analysis proofs are correct, even after asking literally dozens of these proof-verification questions, you have much deeper issues that need to be resolved with your faculty / tutor/ mentor. Not a website.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jul 15 '16 at 23:10













2












2








2


3



$begingroup$



Problem 3.3.14 - If $nu$ is an arbitrary signed measure and $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$. Hints:



a.) It suffices to assume that $mu$ is finite and $nu$ is positive.



b.) With these assumptions, there exists an $Ein M$ that is $sigma$-finite for $nu$ such that $mu(E)geq mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.



c.) The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies on $E$. If $Fcap E = emptyset$, then either $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$ or $mu(F) > 0$ and $|nu(F)| = infty$.




Attempted proof - Consider $mu(E)$ where $E$ is a $sigma$-finite set for $nu$. Since we have that $mu$ is finite then clearly $mu(E)$ must be bounded which implies it has a supremum. We will define the supremum as $$L = supF: F textis sigma-textfinite for nu$$
Now lets take a sequence $E_n_1^infty$ that are $sigma$-finite with respect to $nu$ and $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ as $nrightarrow infty$. Now let $$E = bigcup_1^inftyE_n$$ then $mu(E) leq L$ since it is taken to be a countable union of $sigma$-finite sets. On the other hand, $mu(E)geq mu(E_n)$ for all $n$ and since $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ then $mu(E) = L$. Now since $mu(E) = L$ then clearly by definition of $L$ we have that $mu(E) > mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$. Now we apply the Radon-Nikodym theorem: so, suppose that $Fcap E = emptyset$ well since $nullmu$ then by definition $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$. If $mu(F) > 0$ then for sake of contradiction suppose $|nu(F)|neq infty$. Then since $mu$ is finite $mu(Fcup E) > mu(E)$ then this implies that $Ecup F$ is not $sigma$-finite since a $sigma$-finite set with a union of a finite set is $sigma$-finite. Therefore $|nu(F)| = infty$.



Thus I believe we can refer to Radon-Nikidym theorem to conclude that there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$.



I am not sure if this is completely correct, any suggestions is greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





Problem 3.3.14 - If $nu$ is an arbitrary signed measure and $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$. Hints:



a.) It suffices to assume that $mu$ is finite and $nu$ is positive.



b.) With these assumptions, there exists an $Ein M$ that is $sigma$-finite for $nu$ such that $mu(E)geq mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.



c.) The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies on $E$. If $Fcap E = emptyset$, then either $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$ or $mu(F) > 0$ and $|nu(F)| = infty$.




Attempted proof - Consider $mu(E)$ where $E$ is a $sigma$-finite set for $nu$. Since we have that $mu$ is finite then clearly $mu(E)$ must be bounded which implies it has a supremum. We will define the supremum as $$L = supF: F textis sigma-textfinite for nu$$
Now lets take a sequence $E_n_1^infty$ that are $sigma$-finite with respect to $nu$ and $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ as $nrightarrow infty$. Now let $$E = bigcup_1^inftyE_n$$ then $mu(E) leq L$ since it is taken to be a countable union of $sigma$-finite sets. On the other hand, $mu(E)geq mu(E_n)$ for all $n$ and since $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ then $mu(E) = L$. Now since $mu(E) = L$ then clearly by definition of $L$ we have that $mu(E) > mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$. Now we apply the Radon-Nikodym theorem: so, suppose that $Fcap E = emptyset$ well since $nullmu$ then by definition $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$. If $mu(F) > 0$ then for sake of contradiction suppose $|nu(F)|neq infty$. Then since $mu$ is finite $mu(Fcup E) > mu(E)$ then this implies that $Ecup F$ is not $sigma$-finite since a $sigma$-finite set with a union of a finite set is $sigma$-finite. Therefore $|nu(F)| = infty$.



Thus I believe we can refer to Radon-Nikidym theorem to conclude that there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$.



I am not sure if this is completely correct, any suggestions is greatly appreciated.







real-analysis measure-theory proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jul 15 '16 at 22:59









WolfyWolfy

2,36111241




2,36111241







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you're still not able to decide on your own whether your analysis proofs are correct, even after asking literally dozens of these proof-verification questions, you have much deeper issues that need to be resolved with your faculty / tutor/ mentor. Not a website.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jul 15 '16 at 23:10












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you're still not able to decide on your own whether your analysis proofs are correct, even after asking literally dozens of these proof-verification questions, you have much deeper issues that need to be resolved with your faculty / tutor/ mentor. Not a website.
    $endgroup$
    – T. Bongers
    Jul 15 '16 at 23:10







1




1




$begingroup$
If you're still not able to decide on your own whether your analysis proofs are correct, even after asking literally dozens of these proof-verification questions, you have much deeper issues that need to be resolved with your faculty / tutor/ mentor. Not a website.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Jul 15 '16 at 23:10




$begingroup$
If you're still not able to decide on your own whether your analysis proofs are correct, even after asking literally dozens of these proof-verification questions, you have much deeper issues that need to be resolved with your faculty / tutor/ mentor. Not a website.
$endgroup$
– T. Bongers
Jul 15 '16 at 23:10










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

@Wolfy, here is a detailed proof, following Folland's hints.




Problem 3.3.14 - If $nu$ is an arbitrary signed measure and $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$. Hints:



a.) It suffices to assume that $mu$ is finite and $nu$ is positive.



b.) With these assumptions, there exists an $Ein M$ that is $sigma$-finite for $nu$ such that $mu(E)geq mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.



c.) The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies on $E$. If $Fcap E = emptyset$, then either $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$ or $mu(F) > 0$ and $|nu(F)| = infty$.




Proof - Let us work on hint a.).



Since $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$, there is a countable family $X_n_n$ of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$ such that, fo all $n$, $mu(X_n)<infty$ and $X=bigcup_n X_n$.



Now, let $P$ and $N$ be a Hahn decomposition of $X$ for $nu$. Then $X=Pcup N$, $Pcap N= emptyset$ and, for all measurable set $A$,
$$nu^+(A)=nu(Acap P) quad nu^-(A)=-nu(Acap N)$$



For each $n$, $nu^+|_X_nll mu|_X_n$ and $nu^-|_X_n ll mu|_X_n$.
If we can prove for those cases, that there are extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$.



It is easy to see that $g_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Pcap X_n$ and $f_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Ncap X_n$. So, $h_n=f_n-g_n$ is well defined $mu$-a.e.. (I means we will not have $infty -infty$).



Since $X_n_n$ is a countable family of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$, we have that
$h= sum_n h_n$ is a measurable function and $h:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ and we also have, for any $A$ measurable set,
beginalign*
nu(A) &= sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap P) + sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap N)= \
&= sum_nnu^+(Acap X_n) - sum_nnu^-(Acap X_n)= \
&= sum_n int_Acap X_n f_n dmu - sum_n int_Acap X_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n f_n dmu - int_A sum_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n (f_n - g_n) dmu = \
& =int_A sum_n h_n dmu = int_A h dmu
endalign*

So we have proved that, for any $A$ measurable set,
$$nu(A) = int_A h dmu$$
Since $nu$ is a signed measure, it does not attain either $+infty$ or $-infty$. It follows then that $h$ is not only measurable but it an extended $mu$-integrable function. (In other word, either $int h^+ dmu <infty$ or $int h^- dmu <infty$ or both).



Now, to complete the proof, all we need is to prove that




If $nu$ is a (positive) measure and $mu$ is a finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended measurable function $f:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$.




Consider the set
$$S = mu(F) : textrm $F$ is a $sigma$-finite set for $nu$ $$



Since we have that $mu$ is finite then clearly $S$ must be bounded which implies it has a finite supremum. We will define the supremum as
$$L = supmu(F) : F textis a sigmatext-finite set for nu$$
Now lets take a sequence $E_n_1^infty$ that are $sigma$-finite with respect to $nu$ and $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ as $nrightarrow infty$. Now let $$E = bigcup_1^inftyE_n$$ then $mu(E) leq L$ since $E$ is a $sigma$-finite set (being a countable union of $sigma$-finite sets). On the other hand, $mu(E)geq mu(E_n)$ for all $n$ and since $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ then $mu(E) = L$. Now since $mu(E) = L$ then clearly by definition of $L$ we have that $mu(E) > mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.
So we used hint b.). Now let us work on hint c.).



Now, since $nu|_E$ is $sigma$-finite and $nu|_Ell mu|_E$ we apply the Radon-Nikodym theorem, and so there is $f_1:Erightarrow [0,+infty)$ such that
$$nu(Acap E) =int_Acap E f_1 dmu tag1$$



Now, given any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$, suppose that $mu(F)>0$ and $nu(F) <infty$. Then $Ecup F$ is $sigma$-finite for $nu$, (that is $Ecup F in S$) and
$$mu(Ecup F) =mu(E) +mu( F) > mu(E)=L = sup S$$
Contradiction.



So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,
we have two cases:




  1. $mu(F) =0$ then, since $nu ll mu$, $nu(F)=0$.

  2. if $mu(F)>0$ then $nu(F)=+infty$.

So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,



$$ nu(F) = int_F +infty chi_E^c dmu $$



That means, for any measurable set $A$,



$$ nu(Acap E^c) = int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu tag2$$



Let $f:X rightarrow [0,+infty]$ be defined as $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for $x in E$ and $f(x)=+infty$ for $x notin E$. From $(1)$ and $(2)$, we have, for any measurable set $A$,
$$nu(A)= nu(Acap E)+ nu(Acap E^c)= int_Acap E f_1 dmu +int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu= int_A f dmu$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hey Ramiro, I am just curious about your intuition with considering the set $S$. I follow everything up until that point, then I get a bit lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfy
    Dec 29 '16 at 17:55










  • $begingroup$
    In the expression for $nu(A)$ in part (a), how are you able to take $sum_n=1^infty$ inside the integral. One can arbitrarily change summations and integrals when the $f_n$'s are non-negative. But in this case, $f_n$ is real valued. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, don't we need $sum_n=1^infty int_A |f_n| dmu < infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 27 at 0:40











  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 In part (a), we assume to have extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$. So $f_n$ and $g_n$ are non-negative functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 27 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    @Ramiro Right but $h_n$ is a real valued extended $mu-$ integrable function, right? You have used it in the expression where you changed the order of the sum and the integral? Or is that correct way to think about it is to first decompose $h_n$ into $f_n - g_n$, apply the result to each of these, and then combine them back again?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 28 at 2:34










  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 We first decompose $h_n$. I have edited the steps to make it clearer. Let me know if you have any further question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 28 at 10:26











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1860803%2freal-analysis-problem-3-2-14-the-radon-nikodym-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

@Wolfy, here is a detailed proof, following Folland's hints.




Problem 3.3.14 - If $nu$ is an arbitrary signed measure and $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$. Hints:



a.) It suffices to assume that $mu$ is finite and $nu$ is positive.



b.) With these assumptions, there exists an $Ein M$ that is $sigma$-finite for $nu$ such that $mu(E)geq mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.



c.) The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies on $E$. If $Fcap E = emptyset$, then either $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$ or $mu(F) > 0$ and $|nu(F)| = infty$.




Proof - Let us work on hint a.).



Since $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$, there is a countable family $X_n_n$ of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$ such that, fo all $n$, $mu(X_n)<infty$ and $X=bigcup_n X_n$.



Now, let $P$ and $N$ be a Hahn decomposition of $X$ for $nu$. Then $X=Pcup N$, $Pcap N= emptyset$ and, for all measurable set $A$,
$$nu^+(A)=nu(Acap P) quad nu^-(A)=-nu(Acap N)$$



For each $n$, $nu^+|_X_nll mu|_X_n$ and $nu^-|_X_n ll mu|_X_n$.
If we can prove for those cases, that there are extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$.



It is easy to see that $g_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Pcap X_n$ and $f_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Ncap X_n$. So, $h_n=f_n-g_n$ is well defined $mu$-a.e.. (I means we will not have $infty -infty$).



Since $X_n_n$ is a countable family of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$, we have that
$h= sum_n h_n$ is a measurable function and $h:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ and we also have, for any $A$ measurable set,
beginalign*
nu(A) &= sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap P) + sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap N)= \
&= sum_nnu^+(Acap X_n) - sum_nnu^-(Acap X_n)= \
&= sum_n int_Acap X_n f_n dmu - sum_n int_Acap X_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n f_n dmu - int_A sum_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n (f_n - g_n) dmu = \
& =int_A sum_n h_n dmu = int_A h dmu
endalign*

So we have proved that, for any $A$ measurable set,
$$nu(A) = int_A h dmu$$
Since $nu$ is a signed measure, it does not attain either $+infty$ or $-infty$. It follows then that $h$ is not only measurable but it an extended $mu$-integrable function. (In other word, either $int h^+ dmu <infty$ or $int h^- dmu <infty$ or both).



Now, to complete the proof, all we need is to prove that




If $nu$ is a (positive) measure and $mu$ is a finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended measurable function $f:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$.




Consider the set
$$S = mu(F) : textrm $F$ is a $sigma$-finite set for $nu$ $$



Since we have that $mu$ is finite then clearly $S$ must be bounded which implies it has a finite supremum. We will define the supremum as
$$L = supmu(F) : F textis a sigmatext-finite set for nu$$
Now lets take a sequence $E_n_1^infty$ that are $sigma$-finite with respect to $nu$ and $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ as $nrightarrow infty$. Now let $$E = bigcup_1^inftyE_n$$ then $mu(E) leq L$ since $E$ is a $sigma$-finite set (being a countable union of $sigma$-finite sets). On the other hand, $mu(E)geq mu(E_n)$ for all $n$ and since $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ then $mu(E) = L$. Now since $mu(E) = L$ then clearly by definition of $L$ we have that $mu(E) > mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.
So we used hint b.). Now let us work on hint c.).



Now, since $nu|_E$ is $sigma$-finite and $nu|_Ell mu|_E$ we apply the Radon-Nikodym theorem, and so there is $f_1:Erightarrow [0,+infty)$ such that
$$nu(Acap E) =int_Acap E f_1 dmu tag1$$



Now, given any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$, suppose that $mu(F)>0$ and $nu(F) <infty$. Then $Ecup F$ is $sigma$-finite for $nu$, (that is $Ecup F in S$) and
$$mu(Ecup F) =mu(E) +mu( F) > mu(E)=L = sup S$$
Contradiction.



So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,
we have two cases:




  1. $mu(F) =0$ then, since $nu ll mu$, $nu(F)=0$.

  2. if $mu(F)>0$ then $nu(F)=+infty$.

So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,



$$ nu(F) = int_F +infty chi_E^c dmu $$



That means, for any measurable set $A$,



$$ nu(Acap E^c) = int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu tag2$$



Let $f:X rightarrow [0,+infty]$ be defined as $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for $x in E$ and $f(x)=+infty$ for $x notin E$. From $(1)$ and $(2)$, we have, for any measurable set $A$,
$$nu(A)= nu(Acap E)+ nu(Acap E^c)= int_Acap E f_1 dmu +int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu= int_A f dmu$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hey Ramiro, I am just curious about your intuition with considering the set $S$. I follow everything up until that point, then I get a bit lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfy
    Dec 29 '16 at 17:55










  • $begingroup$
    In the expression for $nu(A)$ in part (a), how are you able to take $sum_n=1^infty$ inside the integral. One can arbitrarily change summations and integrals when the $f_n$'s are non-negative. But in this case, $f_n$ is real valued. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, don't we need $sum_n=1^infty int_A |f_n| dmu < infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 27 at 0:40











  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 In part (a), we assume to have extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$. So $f_n$ and $g_n$ are non-negative functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 27 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    @Ramiro Right but $h_n$ is a real valued extended $mu-$ integrable function, right? You have used it in the expression where you changed the order of the sum and the integral? Or is that correct way to think about it is to first decompose $h_n$ into $f_n - g_n$, apply the result to each of these, and then combine them back again?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 28 at 2:34










  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 We first decompose $h_n$. I have edited the steps to make it clearer. Let me know if you have any further question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 28 at 10:26















2












$begingroup$

@Wolfy, here is a detailed proof, following Folland's hints.




Problem 3.3.14 - If $nu$ is an arbitrary signed measure and $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$. Hints:



a.) It suffices to assume that $mu$ is finite and $nu$ is positive.



b.) With these assumptions, there exists an $Ein M$ that is $sigma$-finite for $nu$ such that $mu(E)geq mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.



c.) The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies on $E$. If $Fcap E = emptyset$, then either $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$ or $mu(F) > 0$ and $|nu(F)| = infty$.




Proof - Let us work on hint a.).



Since $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$, there is a countable family $X_n_n$ of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$ such that, fo all $n$, $mu(X_n)<infty$ and $X=bigcup_n X_n$.



Now, let $P$ and $N$ be a Hahn decomposition of $X$ for $nu$. Then $X=Pcup N$, $Pcap N= emptyset$ and, for all measurable set $A$,
$$nu^+(A)=nu(Acap P) quad nu^-(A)=-nu(Acap N)$$



For each $n$, $nu^+|_X_nll mu|_X_n$ and $nu^-|_X_n ll mu|_X_n$.
If we can prove for those cases, that there are extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$.



It is easy to see that $g_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Pcap X_n$ and $f_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Ncap X_n$. So, $h_n=f_n-g_n$ is well defined $mu$-a.e.. (I means we will not have $infty -infty$).



Since $X_n_n$ is a countable family of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$, we have that
$h= sum_n h_n$ is a measurable function and $h:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ and we also have, for any $A$ measurable set,
beginalign*
nu(A) &= sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap P) + sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap N)= \
&= sum_nnu^+(Acap X_n) - sum_nnu^-(Acap X_n)= \
&= sum_n int_Acap X_n f_n dmu - sum_n int_Acap X_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n f_n dmu - int_A sum_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n (f_n - g_n) dmu = \
& =int_A sum_n h_n dmu = int_A h dmu
endalign*

So we have proved that, for any $A$ measurable set,
$$nu(A) = int_A h dmu$$
Since $nu$ is a signed measure, it does not attain either $+infty$ or $-infty$. It follows then that $h$ is not only measurable but it an extended $mu$-integrable function. (In other word, either $int h^+ dmu <infty$ or $int h^- dmu <infty$ or both).



Now, to complete the proof, all we need is to prove that




If $nu$ is a (positive) measure and $mu$ is a finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended measurable function $f:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$.




Consider the set
$$S = mu(F) : textrm $F$ is a $sigma$-finite set for $nu$ $$



Since we have that $mu$ is finite then clearly $S$ must be bounded which implies it has a finite supremum. We will define the supremum as
$$L = supmu(F) : F textis a sigmatext-finite set for nu$$
Now lets take a sequence $E_n_1^infty$ that are $sigma$-finite with respect to $nu$ and $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ as $nrightarrow infty$. Now let $$E = bigcup_1^inftyE_n$$ then $mu(E) leq L$ since $E$ is a $sigma$-finite set (being a countable union of $sigma$-finite sets). On the other hand, $mu(E)geq mu(E_n)$ for all $n$ and since $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ then $mu(E) = L$. Now since $mu(E) = L$ then clearly by definition of $L$ we have that $mu(E) > mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.
So we used hint b.). Now let us work on hint c.).



Now, since $nu|_E$ is $sigma$-finite and $nu|_Ell mu|_E$ we apply the Radon-Nikodym theorem, and so there is $f_1:Erightarrow [0,+infty)$ such that
$$nu(Acap E) =int_Acap E f_1 dmu tag1$$



Now, given any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$, suppose that $mu(F)>0$ and $nu(F) <infty$. Then $Ecup F$ is $sigma$-finite for $nu$, (that is $Ecup F in S$) and
$$mu(Ecup F) =mu(E) +mu( F) > mu(E)=L = sup S$$
Contradiction.



So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,
we have two cases:




  1. $mu(F) =0$ then, since $nu ll mu$, $nu(F)=0$.

  2. if $mu(F)>0$ then $nu(F)=+infty$.

So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,



$$ nu(F) = int_F +infty chi_E^c dmu $$



That means, for any measurable set $A$,



$$ nu(Acap E^c) = int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu tag2$$



Let $f:X rightarrow [0,+infty]$ be defined as $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for $x in E$ and $f(x)=+infty$ for $x notin E$. From $(1)$ and $(2)$, we have, for any measurable set $A$,
$$nu(A)= nu(Acap E)+ nu(Acap E^c)= int_Acap E f_1 dmu +int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu= int_A f dmu$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Hey Ramiro, I am just curious about your intuition with considering the set $S$. I follow everything up until that point, then I get a bit lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfy
    Dec 29 '16 at 17:55










  • $begingroup$
    In the expression for $nu(A)$ in part (a), how are you able to take $sum_n=1^infty$ inside the integral. One can arbitrarily change summations and integrals when the $f_n$'s are non-negative. But in this case, $f_n$ is real valued. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, don't we need $sum_n=1^infty int_A |f_n| dmu < infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 27 at 0:40











  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 In part (a), we assume to have extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$. So $f_n$ and $g_n$ are non-negative functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 27 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    @Ramiro Right but $h_n$ is a real valued extended $mu-$ integrable function, right? You have used it in the expression where you changed the order of the sum and the integral? Or is that correct way to think about it is to first decompose $h_n$ into $f_n - g_n$, apply the result to each of these, and then combine them back again?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 28 at 2:34










  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 We first decompose $h_n$. I have edited the steps to make it clearer. Let me know if you have any further question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 28 at 10:26













2












2








2





$begingroup$

@Wolfy, here is a detailed proof, following Folland's hints.




Problem 3.3.14 - If $nu$ is an arbitrary signed measure and $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$. Hints:



a.) It suffices to assume that $mu$ is finite and $nu$ is positive.



b.) With these assumptions, there exists an $Ein M$ that is $sigma$-finite for $nu$ such that $mu(E)geq mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.



c.) The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies on $E$. If $Fcap E = emptyset$, then either $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$ or $mu(F) > 0$ and $|nu(F)| = infty$.




Proof - Let us work on hint a.).



Since $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$, there is a countable family $X_n_n$ of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$ such that, fo all $n$, $mu(X_n)<infty$ and $X=bigcup_n X_n$.



Now, let $P$ and $N$ be a Hahn decomposition of $X$ for $nu$. Then $X=Pcup N$, $Pcap N= emptyset$ and, for all measurable set $A$,
$$nu^+(A)=nu(Acap P) quad nu^-(A)=-nu(Acap N)$$



For each $n$, $nu^+|_X_nll mu|_X_n$ and $nu^-|_X_n ll mu|_X_n$.
If we can prove for those cases, that there are extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$.



It is easy to see that $g_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Pcap X_n$ and $f_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Ncap X_n$. So, $h_n=f_n-g_n$ is well defined $mu$-a.e.. (I means we will not have $infty -infty$).



Since $X_n_n$ is a countable family of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$, we have that
$h= sum_n h_n$ is a measurable function and $h:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ and we also have, for any $A$ measurable set,
beginalign*
nu(A) &= sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap P) + sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap N)= \
&= sum_nnu^+(Acap X_n) - sum_nnu^-(Acap X_n)= \
&= sum_n int_Acap X_n f_n dmu - sum_n int_Acap X_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n f_n dmu - int_A sum_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n (f_n - g_n) dmu = \
& =int_A sum_n h_n dmu = int_A h dmu
endalign*

So we have proved that, for any $A$ measurable set,
$$nu(A) = int_A h dmu$$
Since $nu$ is a signed measure, it does not attain either $+infty$ or $-infty$. It follows then that $h$ is not only measurable but it an extended $mu$-integrable function. (In other word, either $int h^+ dmu <infty$ or $int h^- dmu <infty$ or both).



Now, to complete the proof, all we need is to prove that




If $nu$ is a (positive) measure and $mu$ is a finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended measurable function $f:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$.




Consider the set
$$S = mu(F) : textrm $F$ is a $sigma$-finite set for $nu$ $$



Since we have that $mu$ is finite then clearly $S$ must be bounded which implies it has a finite supremum. We will define the supremum as
$$L = supmu(F) : F textis a sigmatext-finite set for nu$$
Now lets take a sequence $E_n_1^infty$ that are $sigma$-finite with respect to $nu$ and $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ as $nrightarrow infty$. Now let $$E = bigcup_1^inftyE_n$$ then $mu(E) leq L$ since $E$ is a $sigma$-finite set (being a countable union of $sigma$-finite sets). On the other hand, $mu(E)geq mu(E_n)$ for all $n$ and since $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ then $mu(E) = L$. Now since $mu(E) = L$ then clearly by definition of $L$ we have that $mu(E) > mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.
So we used hint b.). Now let us work on hint c.).



Now, since $nu|_E$ is $sigma$-finite and $nu|_Ell mu|_E$ we apply the Radon-Nikodym theorem, and so there is $f_1:Erightarrow [0,+infty)$ such that
$$nu(Acap E) =int_Acap E f_1 dmu tag1$$



Now, given any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$, suppose that $mu(F)>0$ and $nu(F) <infty$. Then $Ecup F$ is $sigma$-finite for $nu$, (that is $Ecup F in S$) and
$$mu(Ecup F) =mu(E) +mu( F) > mu(E)=L = sup S$$
Contradiction.



So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,
we have two cases:




  1. $mu(F) =0$ then, since $nu ll mu$, $nu(F)=0$.

  2. if $mu(F)>0$ then $nu(F)=+infty$.

So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,



$$ nu(F) = int_F +infty chi_E^c dmu $$



That means, for any measurable set $A$,



$$ nu(Acap E^c) = int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu tag2$$



Let $f:X rightarrow [0,+infty]$ be defined as $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for $x in E$ and $f(x)=+infty$ for $x notin E$. From $(1)$ and $(2)$, we have, for any measurable set $A$,
$$nu(A)= nu(Acap E)+ nu(Acap E^c)= int_Acap E f_1 dmu +int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu= int_A f dmu$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



@Wolfy, here is a detailed proof, following Folland's hints.




Problem 3.3.14 - If $nu$ is an arbitrary signed measure and $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended $mu$-integrable function $f:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$. Hints:



a.) It suffices to assume that $mu$ is finite and $nu$ is positive.



b.) With these assumptions, there exists an $Ein M$ that is $sigma$-finite for $nu$ such that $mu(E)geq mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.



c.) The Radon-Nikodym theorem applies on $E$. If $Fcap E = emptyset$, then either $nu(F) = mu(F) = 0$ or $mu(F) > 0$ and $|nu(F)| = infty$.




Proof - Let us work on hint a.).



Since $mu$ is a $sigma$-finite measure on $(X,M)$, there is a countable family $X_n_n$ of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$ such that, fo all $n$, $mu(X_n)<infty$ and $X=bigcup_n X_n$.



Now, let $P$ and $N$ be a Hahn decomposition of $X$ for $nu$. Then $X=Pcup N$, $Pcap N= emptyset$ and, for all measurable set $A$,
$$nu^+(A)=nu(Acap P) quad nu^-(A)=-nu(Acap N)$$



For each $n$, $nu^+|_X_nll mu|_X_n$ and $nu^-|_X_n ll mu|_X_n$.
If we can prove for those cases, that there are extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$.



It is easy to see that $g_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Pcap X_n$ and $f_n = 0$ $mu$-a.e. on $Ncap X_n$. So, $h_n=f_n-g_n$ is well defined $mu$-a.e.. (I means we will not have $infty -infty$).



Since $X_n_n$ is a countable family of disjoint measurable subsets of $X$, we have that
$h= sum_n h_n$ is a measurable function and $h:Xrightarrow [-infty,infty]$ and we also have, for any $A$ measurable set,
beginalign*
nu(A) &= sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap P) + sum_nnu(Acap X_ncap N)= \
&= sum_nnu^+(Acap X_n) - sum_nnu^-(Acap X_n)= \
&= sum_n int_Acap X_n f_n dmu - sum_n int_Acap X_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n f_n dmu - int_A sum_n g_n dmu= \
&= int_A sum_n (f_n - g_n) dmu = \
& =int_A sum_n h_n dmu = int_A h dmu
endalign*

So we have proved that, for any $A$ measurable set,
$$nu(A) = int_A h dmu$$
Since $nu$ is a signed measure, it does not attain either $+infty$ or $-infty$. It follows then that $h$ is not only measurable but it an extended $mu$-integrable function. (In other word, either $int h^+ dmu <infty$ or $int h^- dmu <infty$ or both).



Now, to complete the proof, all we need is to prove that




If $nu$ is a (positive) measure and $mu$ is a finite measure on $(X,M)$ such that $null mu$, there exists an extended measurable function $f:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu = fdmu$.




Consider the set
$$S = mu(F) : textrm $F$ is a $sigma$-finite set for $nu$ $$



Since we have that $mu$ is finite then clearly $S$ must be bounded which implies it has a finite supremum. We will define the supremum as
$$L = supmu(F) : F textis a sigmatext-finite set for nu$$
Now lets take a sequence $E_n_1^infty$ that are $sigma$-finite with respect to $nu$ and $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ as $nrightarrow infty$. Now let $$E = bigcup_1^inftyE_n$$ then $mu(E) leq L$ since $E$ is a $sigma$-finite set (being a countable union of $sigma$-finite sets). On the other hand, $mu(E)geq mu(E_n)$ for all $n$ and since $mu(E_n)rightarrow L$ then $mu(E) = L$. Now since $mu(E) = L$ then clearly by definition of $L$ we have that $mu(E) > mu(F)$ for all sets $F$ that are $sigma$-finite for $nu$.
So we used hint b.). Now let us work on hint c.).



Now, since $nu|_E$ is $sigma$-finite and $nu|_Ell mu|_E$ we apply the Radon-Nikodym theorem, and so there is $f_1:Erightarrow [0,+infty)$ such that
$$nu(Acap E) =int_Acap E f_1 dmu tag1$$



Now, given any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$, suppose that $mu(F)>0$ and $nu(F) <infty$. Then $Ecup F$ is $sigma$-finite for $nu$, (that is $Ecup F in S$) and
$$mu(Ecup F) =mu(E) +mu( F) > mu(E)=L = sup S$$
Contradiction.



So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,
we have two cases:




  1. $mu(F) =0$ then, since $nu ll mu$, $nu(F)=0$.

  2. if $mu(F)>0$ then $nu(F)=+infty$.

So, for any measurable set $F$ such that $Fcap E = emptyset$,



$$ nu(F) = int_F +infty chi_E^c dmu $$



That means, for any measurable set $A$,



$$ nu(Acap E^c) = int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu tag2$$



Let $f:X rightarrow [0,+infty]$ be defined as $f(x)=f_1(x)$ for $x in E$ and $f(x)=+infty$ for $x notin E$. From $(1)$ and $(2)$, we have, for any measurable set $A$,
$$nu(A)= nu(Acap E)+ nu(Acap E^c)= int_Acap E f_1 dmu +int_Acap E^c +infty chi_E^c dmu= int_A f dmu$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 28 at 10:21

























answered Jul 16 '16 at 3:29









RamiroRamiro

7,32421535




7,32421535











  • $begingroup$
    Hey Ramiro, I am just curious about your intuition with considering the set $S$. I follow everything up until that point, then I get a bit lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfy
    Dec 29 '16 at 17:55










  • $begingroup$
    In the expression for $nu(A)$ in part (a), how are you able to take $sum_n=1^infty$ inside the integral. One can arbitrarily change summations and integrals when the $f_n$'s are non-negative. But in this case, $f_n$ is real valued. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, don't we need $sum_n=1^infty int_A |f_n| dmu < infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 27 at 0:40











  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 In part (a), we assume to have extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$. So $f_n$ and $g_n$ are non-negative functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 27 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    @Ramiro Right but $h_n$ is a real valued extended $mu-$ integrable function, right? You have used it in the expression where you changed the order of the sum and the integral? Or is that correct way to think about it is to first decompose $h_n$ into $f_n - g_n$, apply the result to each of these, and then combine them back again?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 28 at 2:34










  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 We first decompose $h_n$. I have edited the steps to make it clearer. Let me know if you have any further question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 28 at 10:26
















  • $begingroup$
    Hey Ramiro, I am just curious about your intuition with considering the set $S$. I follow everything up until that point, then I get a bit lost.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfy
    Dec 29 '16 at 17:55










  • $begingroup$
    In the expression for $nu(A)$ in part (a), how are you able to take $sum_n=1^infty$ inside the integral. One can arbitrarily change summations and integrals when the $f_n$'s are non-negative. But in this case, $f_n$ is real valued. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, don't we need $sum_n=1^infty int_A |f_n| dmu < infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 27 at 0:40











  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 In part (a), we assume to have extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$. So $f_n$ and $g_n$ are non-negative functions.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 27 at 11:26











  • $begingroup$
    @Ramiro Right but $h_n$ is a real valued extended $mu-$ integrable function, right? You have used it in the expression where you changed the order of the sum and the integral? Or is that correct way to think about it is to first decompose $h_n$ into $f_n - g_n$, apply the result to each of these, and then combine them back again?
    $endgroup$
    – user82261
    Mar 28 at 2:34










  • $begingroup$
    @user82261 We first decompose $h_n$. I have edited the steps to make it clearer. Let me know if you have any further question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ramiro
    Mar 28 at 10:26















$begingroup$
Hey Ramiro, I am just curious about your intuition with considering the set $S$. I follow everything up until that point, then I get a bit lost.
$endgroup$
– Wolfy
Dec 29 '16 at 17:55




$begingroup$
Hey Ramiro, I am just curious about your intuition with considering the set $S$. I follow everything up until that point, then I get a bit lost.
$endgroup$
– Wolfy
Dec 29 '16 at 17:55












$begingroup$
In the expression for $nu(A)$ in part (a), how are you able to take $sum_n=1^infty$ inside the integral. One can arbitrarily change summations and integrals when the $f_n$'s are non-negative. But in this case, $f_n$ is real valued. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, don't we need $sum_n=1^infty int_A |f_n| dmu < infty$?
$endgroup$
– user82261
Mar 27 at 0:40





$begingroup$
In the expression for $nu(A)$ in part (a), how are you able to take $sum_n=1^infty$ inside the integral. One can arbitrarily change summations and integrals when the $f_n$'s are non-negative. But in this case, $f_n$ is real valued. By the Dominated Convergence Theorem, don't we need $sum_n=1^infty int_A |f_n| dmu < infty$?
$endgroup$
– user82261
Mar 27 at 0:40













$begingroup$
@user82261 In part (a), we assume to have extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$. So $f_n$ and $g_n$ are non-negative functions.
$endgroup$
– Ramiro
Mar 27 at 11:26





$begingroup$
@user82261 In part (a), we assume to have extended $mu$-integrable functions $f_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^+|_X_n = f_ndmu|_X_n$ and extended $mu$-integrable functions $g_n:Xrightarrow [0,infty]$ such that $dnu^-|_X_n = g_ndmu|_X_n$. So $f_n$ and $g_n$ are non-negative functions.
$endgroup$
– Ramiro
Mar 27 at 11:26













$begingroup$
@Ramiro Right but $h_n$ is a real valued extended $mu-$ integrable function, right? You have used it in the expression where you changed the order of the sum and the integral? Or is that correct way to think about it is to first decompose $h_n$ into $f_n - g_n$, apply the result to each of these, and then combine them back again?
$endgroup$
– user82261
Mar 28 at 2:34




$begingroup$
@Ramiro Right but $h_n$ is a real valued extended $mu-$ integrable function, right? You have used it in the expression where you changed the order of the sum and the integral? Or is that correct way to think about it is to first decompose $h_n$ into $f_n - g_n$, apply the result to each of these, and then combine them back again?
$endgroup$
– user82261
Mar 28 at 2:34












$begingroup$
@user82261 We first decompose $h_n$. I have edited the steps to make it clearer. Let me know if you have any further question.
$endgroup$
– Ramiro
Mar 28 at 10:26




$begingroup$
@user82261 We first decompose $h_n$. I have edited the steps to make it clearer. Let me know if you have any further question.
$endgroup$
– Ramiro
Mar 28 at 10:26

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1860803%2freal-analysis-problem-3-2-14-the-radon-nikodym-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O

Serbia Índice Etimología Historia Geografía Entorno natural División administrativa Política Demografía Economía Cultura Deportes Véase también Notas Referencias Bibliografía Enlaces externos Menú de navegación44°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.46666666666744°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.466666666667U.S. Department of Commerce (2015)«Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2018»Kosovo-Metohija.Neutralna Srbija u NATO okruzenju.The SerbsTheories on the Origin of the Serbs.Serbia.Earls: Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases.Egeo y Balcanes.Kalemegdan.Southern Pannonia during the age of the Great Migrations.Culture in Serbia.History.The Serbian Origin of the Montenegrins.Nemanjics' period (1186-1353).Stefan Uros (1355-1371).Serbian medieval history.Habsburg–Ottoman Wars (1525–1718).The Ottoman Empire, 1700-1922.The First Serbian Uprising.Miloš, prince of Serbia.3. Bosnia-Hercegovina and the Congress of Berlin.The Balkan Wars and the Partition of Macedonia.The Falcon and the Eagle: Montenegro and Austria-Hungary, 1908-1914.Typhus fever on the eastern front in World War I.Anniversary of WWI battle marked in Serbia.La derrota austriaca en los Balcanes. Fin del Imperio Austro-Húngaro.Imperio austriaco y Reino de Hungría.Los tiempos modernos: del capitalismo a la globalización, siglos XVII al XXI.The period of Croatia within ex-Yugoslavia.Yugoslavia: Much in a Name.Las dictaduras europeas.Croacia: mito y realidad."Crods ask arms".Prólogo a la invasión.La campaña de los Balcanes.La resistencia en Yugoslavia.Jasenovac Research Institute.Día en memoria de las víctimas del genocidio en la Segunda Guerra Mundial.El infierno estuvo en Jasenovac.Croacia empieza a «desenterrar» a sus muertos de Jasenovac.World fascism: a historical encyclopedia, Volumen 1.Tito. Josip Broz.El nuevo orden y la resistencia.La conquista del poder.Algunos aspectos de la economía yugoslava a mediados de 1962.Albania-Kosovo crisis.De Kosovo a Kosova: una visión demográfica.La crisis de la economía yugoslava y la política de "estabilización".Milosevic: el poder de un absolutista."Serbia under Milošević: politics in the 1990s"Milosevic cavó en Kosovo la tumba de la antigua Yugoslavia.La ONU exculpa a Serbia de genocidio en la guerra de Bosnia.Slobodan Milosevic, el burócrata que supo usar el odio.Es la fuerza contra el sufrimiento de muchos inocentes.Matanza de civiles al bombardear la OTAN un puente mientras pasaba un tren.Las consecuencias negativas de los bombardeos de Yugoslavia se sentirán aún durante largo tiempo.Kostunica advierte que la misión de Europa en Kosovo es ilegal.Las 24 horas más largas en la vida de Slobodan Milosevic.Serbia declara la guerra a la mafia por matar a Djindjic.Tadic presentará "quizás en diciembre" la solicitud de entrada en la UE.Montenegro declara su independencia de Serbia.Serbia se declara estado soberano tras separación de Montenegro.«Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion)»Mladic pasa por el médico antes de la audiencia para extraditarloDatos de Serbia y Kosovo.The Carpathian Mountains.Position, Relief, Climate.Transport.Finding birds in Serbia.U Srbiji do 2010. godine 10% teritorije nacionalni parkovi.Geography.Serbia: Climate.Variability of Climate In Serbia In The Second Half of The 20thc Entury.BASIC CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE TERRITORY OF SERBIA.Fauna y flora: Serbia.Serbia and Montenegro.Información general sobre Serbia.Republic of Serbia Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA).Serbia recycling 15% of waste.Reform process of the Serbian energy sector.20-MW Wind Project Being Developed in Serbia.Las Naciones Unidas. Paz para Kosovo.Aniversario sin fiesta.Population by national or ethnic groups by Census 2002.Article 7. Coat of arms, flag and national anthem.Serbia, flag of.Historia.«Serbia and Montenegro in Pictures»Serbia.Serbia aprueba su nueva Constitución con un apoyo de más del 50%.Serbia. Population.«El nacionalista Nikolic gana las elecciones presidenciales en Serbia»El europeísta Borís Tadic gana la segunda vuelta de las presidenciales serbias.Aleksandar Vucic, de ultranacionalista serbio a fervoroso europeístaKostunica condena la declaración del "falso estado" de Kosovo.Comienza el debate sobre la independencia de Kosovo en el TIJ.La Corte Internacional de Justicia dice que Kosovo no violó el derecho internacional al declarar su independenciaKosovo: Enviado de la ONU advierte tensiones y fragilidad.«Bruselas recomienda negociar la adhesión de Serbia tras el acuerdo sobre Kosovo»Monografía de Serbia.Bez smanjivanja Vojske Srbije.Military statistics Serbia and Montenegro.Šutanovac: Vojni budžet za 2009. godinu 70 milijardi dinara.Serbia-Montenegro shortens obligatory military service to six months.No hay justicia para las víctimas de los bombardeos de la OTAN.Zapatero reitera la negativa de España a reconocer la independencia de Kosovo.Anniversary of the signing of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement.Detenido en Serbia Radovan Karadzic, el criminal de guerra más buscado de Europa."Serbia presentará su candidatura de acceso a la UE antes de fin de año".Serbia solicita la adhesión a la UE.Detenido el exgeneral serbobosnio Ratko Mladic, principal acusado del genocidio en los Balcanes«Lista de todos los Estados Miembros de las Naciones Unidas que son parte o signatarios en los diversos instrumentos de derechos humanos de las Naciones Unidas»versión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre la Eliminación de todas las Formas de Discriminación contra la MujerConvención contra la tortura y otros tratos o penas crueles, inhumanos o degradantesversión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con DiscapacidadEl ACNUR recibe con beneplácito el envío de tropas de la OTAN a Kosovo y se prepara ante una posible llegada de refugiados a Serbia.Kosovo.- El jefe de la Minuk denuncia que los serbios boicotearon las legislativas por 'presiones'.Bosnia and Herzegovina. Population.Datos básicos de Montenegro, historia y evolución política.Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa global de fecundidad (por 1000 habitantes).Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa bruta de mortalidad (por 1000 habitantes).Population.Falleció el patriarca de la Iglesia Ortodoxa serbia.Atacan en Kosovo autobuses con peregrinos tras la investidura del patriarca serbio IrinejSerbian in Hungary.Tasas de cambio."Kosovo es de todos sus ciudadanos".Report for Serbia.Country groups by income.GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA 1997–2007.Economic Trends in the Republic of Serbia 2006.National Accounts Statitics.Саопштења за јавност.GDP per inhabitant varied by one to six across the EU27 Member States.Un pacto de estabilidad para Serbia.Unemployment rate rises in Serbia.Serbia, Belarus agree free trade to woo investors.Serbia, Turkey call investors to Serbia.Success Stories.U.S. Private Investment in Serbia and Montenegro.Positive trend.Banks in Serbia.La Cámara de Comercio acompaña a empresas madrileñas a Serbia y Croacia.Serbia Industries.Energy and mining.Agriculture.Late crops, fruit and grapes output, 2008.Rebranding Serbia: A Hobby Shortly to Become a Full-Time Job.Final data on livestock statistics, 2008.Serbian cell-phone users.U Srbiji sve više računara.Телекомуникације.U Srbiji 27 odsto gradjana koristi Internet.Serbia and Montenegro.Тренд гледаности програма РТС-а у 2008. и 2009.години.Serbian railways.General Terms.El mercado del transporte aéreo en Serbia.Statistics.Vehículos de motor registrados.Planes ambiciosos para el transporte fluvial.Turismo.Turistički promet u Republici Srbiji u periodu januar-novembar 2007. godine.Your Guide to Culture.Novi Sad - city of culture.Nis - european crossroads.Serbia. Properties inscribed on the World Heritage List .Stari Ras and Sopoćani.Studenica Monastery.Medieval Monuments in Kosovo.Gamzigrad-Romuliana, Palace of Galerius.Skiing and snowboarding in Kopaonik.Tara.New7Wonders of Nature Finalists.Pilgrimage of Saint Sava.Exit Festival: Best european festival.Banje u Srbiji.«The Encyclopedia of world history»Culture.Centenario del arte serbio.«Djordje Andrejevic Kun: el único pintor de los brigadistas yugoslavos de la guerra civil española»About the museum.The collections.Miroslav Gospel – Manuscript from 1180.Historicity in the Serbo-Croatian Heroic Epic.Culture and Sport.Conversación con el rector del Seminario San Sava.'Reina Margot' funde drama, historia y gesto con música de Goran Bregovic.Serbia gana Eurovisión y España decepciona de nuevo con un vigésimo puesto.Home.Story.Emir Kusturica.Tercer oro para Paskaljevic.Nikola Tesla Year.Home.Tesla, un genio tomado por loco.Aniversario de la muerte de Nikola Tesla.El Museo Nikola Tesla en Belgrado.El inventor del mundo actual.República de Serbia.University of Belgrade official statistics.University of Novi Sad.University of Kragujevac.University of Nis.Comida. Cocina serbia.Cooking.Montenegro se convertirá en el miembro 204 del movimiento olímpico.España, campeona de Europa de baloncesto.El Partizan de Belgrado se corona campeón por octava vez consecutiva.Serbia se clasifica para el Mundial de 2010 de Sudáfrica.Serbia Name Squad For Northern Ireland And South Korea Tests.Fútbol.- El Partizán de Belgrado se proclama campeón de la Liga serbia.Clasificacion final Mundial de balonmano Croacia 2009.Serbia vence a España y se consagra campeón mundial de waterpolo.Novak Djokovic no convence pero gana en Australia.Gana Ana Ivanovic el Roland Garros.Serena Williams gana el US Open por tercera vez.Biography.Bradt Travel Guide SerbiaThe Encyclopedia of World War IGobierno de SerbiaPortal del Gobierno de SerbiaPresidencia de SerbiaAsamblea Nacional SerbiaMinisterio de Asuntos exteriores de SerbiaBanco Nacional de SerbiaAgencia Serbia para la Promoción de la Inversión y la ExportaciónOficina de Estadísticas de SerbiaCIA. Factbook 2008Organización nacional de turismo de SerbiaDiscover SerbiaConoce SerbiaNoticias de SerbiaSerbiaWorldCat1512028760000 0000 9526 67094054598-2n8519591900570825ge1309191004530741010url17413117006669D055771Serbia