Proving that there doesn't exist a binary code with parameters [6,5,4] The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCoding theory (existence of codes with given parameters)Constructing a Linear Binary CodeConstructing a Cyclic code of length p-1 with minimal distance d<=p-1 if p is primeProve there doesn't exist [10,5,4] linear binary and self-dual code.Find the minimal $n$ such that there exists $[n,n-5]$ cyclic binary code with generator polynomial $g(x)=1+x^4+x^5$Generating a binary code with maximized Hamming distanceGive the generator polynomial of a binary cyclic [9, 2] code.Proving that a $(90, 2^78, 5)_2$ code doesn't existIf a binary $(n,M,d)$ code with $d$ even exists, then exists an $(n,M,d)$ code with even weight for all it's codewordsLinear Binary Code doesn't exist, proof by coset weight distribution

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

Have you ever entered Singapore using a different passport or name?

Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?

Identify boardgame from Big movie

How to type this arrow in math mode?

What did it mean to "align" a radio?

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

Resizing object distorts it (Illustrator CC 2018)

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

What does ひと匙 mean in this manga and has it been used colloquially?

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have for the breaking of silver and other metals into dust?

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

One word riddle: Vowel in the middle

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?



Proving that there doesn't exist a binary code with parameters [6,5,4]



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCoding theory (existence of codes with given parameters)Constructing a Linear Binary CodeConstructing a Cyclic code of length p-1 with minimal distance d<=p-1 if p is primeProve there doesn't exist [10,5,4] linear binary and self-dual code.Find the minimal $n$ such that there exists $[n,n-5]$ cyclic binary code with generator polynomial $g(x)=1+x^4+x^5$Generating a binary code with maximized Hamming distanceGive the generator polynomial of a binary cyclic [9, 2] code.Proving that a $(90, 2^78, 5)_2$ code doesn't existIf a binary $(n,M,d)$ code with $d$ even exists, then exists an $(n,M,d)$ code with even weight for all it's codewordsLinear Binary Code doesn't exist, proof by coset weight distribution










-1












$begingroup$


I'm new to code theory and I'm having trouble with proving if a code doesn't exist in general.
I found a binary code with the parameters [6,4,4] but I don't really understand why there cant be one with parameters [6,5,4].
It would help a lot having an example of such problems.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Linear code? Block code? Cyclic code? This question lacks context.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 30 at 17:46















-1












$begingroup$


I'm new to code theory and I'm having trouble with proving if a code doesn't exist in general.
I found a binary code with the parameters [6,4,4] but I don't really understand why there cant be one with parameters [6,5,4].
It would help a lot having an example of such problems.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Linear code? Block code? Cyclic code? This question lacks context.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 30 at 17:46













-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


I'm new to code theory and I'm having trouble with proving if a code doesn't exist in general.
I found a binary code with the parameters [6,4,4] but I don't really understand why there cant be one with parameters [6,5,4].
It would help a lot having an example of such problems.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm new to code theory and I'm having trouble with proving if a code doesn't exist in general.
I found a binary code with the parameters [6,4,4] but I don't really understand why there cant be one with parameters [6,5,4].
It would help a lot having an example of such problems.



Thanks in advance.







coding-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 30 at 17:41









evgniy tayarovevgniy tayarov

112




112











  • $begingroup$
    Linear code? Block code? Cyclic code? This question lacks context.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 30 at 17:46
















  • $begingroup$
    Linear code? Block code? Cyclic code? This question lacks context.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Towers
    Mar 30 at 17:46















$begingroup$
Linear code? Block code? Cyclic code? This question lacks context.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Mar 30 at 17:46




$begingroup$
Linear code? Block code? Cyclic code? This question lacks context.
$endgroup$
– Eric Towers
Mar 30 at 17:46










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Assuming you mean a linear error-correcting code, a common interpretation of "[6,5,4] code" is a code using $6$-bit codewords to represent $5$-bit messages where any two distinct codewords differ in at least $4$ bits.



There are $2^6 = 64$ possible codewords. We have $2^5 = 32$ messages. In the lattice $0,1^6$, each codeword is surrounded by an open ball of radius $4$ containing no other codewords. One can use the Singleton bound to show that $5 + 4 leq 6 + 1$ if this code is realizable. However, $9 not leq 7$, so this code is not realizable.



The Singleton bound is a very loose bound. Generally, for a realizable [c,m,d] linear error-correcting code, the inequality is $m+d leq c+1$. The Singleton bound also indicates there is no realizable [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code.



There is another way to show there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code. We have $64$ codewords and $32$ messages. By distance 4, there can be no pair of messages assigned to complementary codewords. By the pigeonhole principle, since there are only $32$ such pairs of codewords, any such pair has exactly one message assigned to it. This means there is a message assigned to exactly one of $000000_2$ and $111111_2$. Similarly, there is exactly one message assigned to the codeword pair $000111_2$ and $111000_2$. However, no such assignment is possible since any member of one pair is only distance three from either member of the other pair. beginalign*
d(000000_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, \
d(000000_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text, \
d(111111_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, and \
d(111111_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text.
endalign*

Consequently, there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code.



(This counting argument can be adapted to show there is in [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code. Take the codewords in groups of $4$ having matching first four bits. This gives 16 groups each member of which differs from the other members of its group in only two bits, so at most one of those codewords is assigned to a message. There are 16 messages, so each group is assigned exactly one messsage. Then the groups $0000**_2$ and $0001**_2$, where "$*$" represents a bit whose value is either $0$ or $1$ (but this is not critical since either choice gives a codeword in the same group), each have a message, but regardless of which codeword is chosen in each group, those codewords differ in at most three bits.)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:34


















-1












$begingroup$

Assuming you are talking about non-trivial perfect binary codes of the form $[l,x,d]$, we have that the code can correct up to $e=lfloorfracd-12rfloor$ errors. If a non-trivial perfect binary code exists, it must hold that $sum_i=0^ebinomli$ is a power of $2$.



In our case, $d=4$, so $e=lfloorfrac32rfloor=1$ and $l=6$. $binom60+binom61=1+6=7$ which is not a power of $2$, so such code cannot exist, unless it's trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! This helps alot
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    This question just seems to be asking about the existence of a code, not about perfect codes. Your argument shows that a code with these parameters is not perfect, but not that it does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Mar 31 at 14:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MorganRodgers If the OP leaves the people answering the question to guess what they're talking about, we'll fill in answers as we think is necessary. As the original question didn't seem too complicated, I thought they were talking about perfect codes as such a check is simple and short. If they were not, they should've specified that. If they use this answer even though it might be not what they looking for, then they should read up on the subject before asking a question and accepting random answers. Therefore, I don't think my answer is bad, it's just an answer to a bad question.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc
    Mar 31 at 15:53











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168573%2fproving-that-there-doesnt-exist-a-binary-code-with-parameters-6-5-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Assuming you mean a linear error-correcting code, a common interpretation of "[6,5,4] code" is a code using $6$-bit codewords to represent $5$-bit messages where any two distinct codewords differ in at least $4$ bits.



There are $2^6 = 64$ possible codewords. We have $2^5 = 32$ messages. In the lattice $0,1^6$, each codeword is surrounded by an open ball of radius $4$ containing no other codewords. One can use the Singleton bound to show that $5 + 4 leq 6 + 1$ if this code is realizable. However, $9 not leq 7$, so this code is not realizable.



The Singleton bound is a very loose bound. Generally, for a realizable [c,m,d] linear error-correcting code, the inequality is $m+d leq c+1$. The Singleton bound also indicates there is no realizable [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code.



There is another way to show there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code. We have $64$ codewords and $32$ messages. By distance 4, there can be no pair of messages assigned to complementary codewords. By the pigeonhole principle, since there are only $32$ such pairs of codewords, any such pair has exactly one message assigned to it. This means there is a message assigned to exactly one of $000000_2$ and $111111_2$. Similarly, there is exactly one message assigned to the codeword pair $000111_2$ and $111000_2$. However, no such assignment is possible since any member of one pair is only distance three from either member of the other pair. beginalign*
d(000000_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, \
d(000000_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text, \
d(111111_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, and \
d(111111_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text.
endalign*

Consequently, there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code.



(This counting argument can be adapted to show there is in [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code. Take the codewords in groups of $4$ having matching first four bits. This gives 16 groups each member of which differs from the other members of its group in only two bits, so at most one of those codewords is assigned to a message. There are 16 messages, so each group is assigned exactly one messsage. Then the groups $0000**_2$ and $0001**_2$, where "$*$" represents a bit whose value is either $0$ or $1$ (but this is not critical since either choice gives a codeword in the same group), each have a message, but regardless of which codeword is chosen in each group, those codewords differ in at most three bits.)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:34















0












$begingroup$

Assuming you mean a linear error-correcting code, a common interpretation of "[6,5,4] code" is a code using $6$-bit codewords to represent $5$-bit messages where any two distinct codewords differ in at least $4$ bits.



There are $2^6 = 64$ possible codewords. We have $2^5 = 32$ messages. In the lattice $0,1^6$, each codeword is surrounded by an open ball of radius $4$ containing no other codewords. One can use the Singleton bound to show that $5 + 4 leq 6 + 1$ if this code is realizable. However, $9 not leq 7$, so this code is not realizable.



The Singleton bound is a very loose bound. Generally, for a realizable [c,m,d] linear error-correcting code, the inequality is $m+d leq c+1$. The Singleton bound also indicates there is no realizable [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code.



There is another way to show there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code. We have $64$ codewords and $32$ messages. By distance 4, there can be no pair of messages assigned to complementary codewords. By the pigeonhole principle, since there are only $32$ such pairs of codewords, any such pair has exactly one message assigned to it. This means there is a message assigned to exactly one of $000000_2$ and $111111_2$. Similarly, there is exactly one message assigned to the codeword pair $000111_2$ and $111000_2$. However, no such assignment is possible since any member of one pair is only distance three from either member of the other pair. beginalign*
d(000000_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, \
d(000000_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text, \
d(111111_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, and \
d(111111_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text.
endalign*

Consequently, there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code.



(This counting argument can be adapted to show there is in [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code. Take the codewords in groups of $4$ having matching first four bits. This gives 16 groups each member of which differs from the other members of its group in only two bits, so at most one of those codewords is assigned to a message. There are 16 messages, so each group is assigned exactly one messsage. Then the groups $0000**_2$ and $0001**_2$, where "$*$" represents a bit whose value is either $0$ or $1$ (but this is not critical since either choice gives a codeword in the same group), each have a message, but regardless of which codeword is chosen in each group, those codewords differ in at most three bits.)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:34













0












0








0





$begingroup$

Assuming you mean a linear error-correcting code, a common interpretation of "[6,5,4] code" is a code using $6$-bit codewords to represent $5$-bit messages where any two distinct codewords differ in at least $4$ bits.



There are $2^6 = 64$ possible codewords. We have $2^5 = 32$ messages. In the lattice $0,1^6$, each codeword is surrounded by an open ball of radius $4$ containing no other codewords. One can use the Singleton bound to show that $5 + 4 leq 6 + 1$ if this code is realizable. However, $9 not leq 7$, so this code is not realizable.



The Singleton bound is a very loose bound. Generally, for a realizable [c,m,d] linear error-correcting code, the inequality is $m+d leq c+1$. The Singleton bound also indicates there is no realizable [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code.



There is another way to show there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code. We have $64$ codewords and $32$ messages. By distance 4, there can be no pair of messages assigned to complementary codewords. By the pigeonhole principle, since there are only $32$ such pairs of codewords, any such pair has exactly one message assigned to it. This means there is a message assigned to exactly one of $000000_2$ and $111111_2$. Similarly, there is exactly one message assigned to the codeword pair $000111_2$ and $111000_2$. However, no such assignment is possible since any member of one pair is only distance three from either member of the other pair. beginalign*
d(000000_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, \
d(000000_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text, \
d(111111_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, and \
d(111111_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text.
endalign*

Consequently, there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code.



(This counting argument can be adapted to show there is in [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code. Take the codewords in groups of $4$ having matching first four bits. This gives 16 groups each member of which differs from the other members of its group in only two bits, so at most one of those codewords is assigned to a message. There are 16 messages, so each group is assigned exactly one messsage. Then the groups $0000**_2$ and $0001**_2$, where "$*$" represents a bit whose value is either $0$ or $1$ (but this is not critical since either choice gives a codeword in the same group), each have a message, but regardless of which codeword is chosen in each group, those codewords differ in at most three bits.)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Assuming you mean a linear error-correcting code, a common interpretation of "[6,5,4] code" is a code using $6$-bit codewords to represent $5$-bit messages where any two distinct codewords differ in at least $4$ bits.



There are $2^6 = 64$ possible codewords. We have $2^5 = 32$ messages. In the lattice $0,1^6$, each codeword is surrounded by an open ball of radius $4$ containing no other codewords. One can use the Singleton bound to show that $5 + 4 leq 6 + 1$ if this code is realizable. However, $9 not leq 7$, so this code is not realizable.



The Singleton bound is a very loose bound. Generally, for a realizable [c,m,d] linear error-correcting code, the inequality is $m+d leq c+1$. The Singleton bound also indicates there is no realizable [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code.



There is another way to show there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code. We have $64$ codewords and $32$ messages. By distance 4, there can be no pair of messages assigned to complementary codewords. By the pigeonhole principle, since there are only $32$ such pairs of codewords, any such pair has exactly one message assigned to it. This means there is a message assigned to exactly one of $000000_2$ and $111111_2$. Similarly, there is exactly one message assigned to the codeword pair $000111_2$ and $111000_2$. However, no such assignment is possible since any member of one pair is only distance three from either member of the other pair. beginalign*
d(000000_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, \
d(000000_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text, \
d(111111_2, 111000_2) &= 3 text, and \
d(111111_2, 000111_2) &= 3 text.
endalign*

Consequently, there is no [6,5,4] linear error-correcting code.



(This counting argument can be adapted to show there is in [6,4,4] linear error-correcting code. Take the codewords in groups of $4$ having matching first four bits. This gives 16 groups each member of which differs from the other members of its group in only two bits, so at most one of those codewords is assigned to a message. There are 16 messages, so each group is assigned exactly one messsage. Then the groups $0000**_2$ and $0001**_2$, where "$*$" represents a bit whose value is either $0$ or $1$ (but this is not critical since either choice gives a codeword in the same group), each have a message, but regardless of which codeword is chosen in each group, those codewords differ in at most three bits.)







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 30 at 18:44

























answered Mar 30 at 18:14









Eric TowersEric Towers

33.8k22370




33.8k22370











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:34
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the detailed answer
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:34















$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Mar 30 at 18:34




$begingroup$
Thank you for the detailed answer
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Mar 30 at 18:34











-1












$begingroup$

Assuming you are talking about non-trivial perfect binary codes of the form $[l,x,d]$, we have that the code can correct up to $e=lfloorfracd-12rfloor$ errors. If a non-trivial perfect binary code exists, it must hold that $sum_i=0^ebinomli$ is a power of $2$.



In our case, $d=4$, so $e=lfloorfrac32rfloor=1$ and $l=6$. $binom60+binom61=1+6=7$ which is not a power of $2$, so such code cannot exist, unless it's trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! This helps alot
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    This question just seems to be asking about the existence of a code, not about perfect codes. Your argument shows that a code with these parameters is not perfect, but not that it does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Mar 31 at 14:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MorganRodgers If the OP leaves the people answering the question to guess what they're talking about, we'll fill in answers as we think is necessary. As the original question didn't seem too complicated, I thought they were talking about perfect codes as such a check is simple and short. If they were not, they should've specified that. If they use this answer even though it might be not what they looking for, then they should read up on the subject before asking a question and accepting random answers. Therefore, I don't think my answer is bad, it's just an answer to a bad question.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc
    Mar 31 at 15:53















-1












$begingroup$

Assuming you are talking about non-trivial perfect binary codes of the form $[l,x,d]$, we have that the code can correct up to $e=lfloorfracd-12rfloor$ errors. If a non-trivial perfect binary code exists, it must hold that $sum_i=0^ebinomli$ is a power of $2$.



In our case, $d=4$, so $e=lfloorfrac32rfloor=1$ and $l=6$. $binom60+binom61=1+6=7$ which is not a power of $2$, so such code cannot exist, unless it's trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! This helps alot
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    This question just seems to be asking about the existence of a code, not about perfect codes. Your argument shows that a code with these parameters is not perfect, but not that it does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Mar 31 at 14:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MorganRodgers If the OP leaves the people answering the question to guess what they're talking about, we'll fill in answers as we think is necessary. As the original question didn't seem too complicated, I thought they were talking about perfect codes as such a check is simple and short. If they were not, they should've specified that. If they use this answer even though it might be not what they looking for, then they should read up on the subject before asking a question and accepting random answers. Therefore, I don't think my answer is bad, it's just an answer to a bad question.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc
    Mar 31 at 15:53













-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$

Assuming you are talking about non-trivial perfect binary codes of the form $[l,x,d]$, we have that the code can correct up to $e=lfloorfracd-12rfloor$ errors. If a non-trivial perfect binary code exists, it must hold that $sum_i=0^ebinomli$ is a power of $2$.



In our case, $d=4$, so $e=lfloorfrac32rfloor=1$ and $l=6$. $binom60+binom61=1+6=7$ which is not a power of $2$, so such code cannot exist, unless it's trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Assuming you are talking about non-trivial perfect binary codes of the form $[l,x,d]$, we have that the code can correct up to $e=lfloorfracd-12rfloor$ errors. If a non-trivial perfect binary code exists, it must hold that $sum_i=0^ebinomli$ is a power of $2$.



In our case, $d=4$, so $e=lfloorfrac32rfloor=1$ and $l=6$. $binom60+binom61=1+6=7$ which is not a power of $2$, so such code cannot exist, unless it's trivial.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 30 at 18:14









MarcMarc

520211




520211











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! This helps alot
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    This question just seems to be asking about the existence of a code, not about perfect codes. Your argument shows that a code with these parameters is not perfect, but not that it does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Mar 31 at 14:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MorganRodgers If the OP leaves the people answering the question to guess what they're talking about, we'll fill in answers as we think is necessary. As the original question didn't seem too complicated, I thought they were talking about perfect codes as such a check is simple and short. If they were not, they should've specified that. If they use this answer even though it might be not what they looking for, then they should read up on the subject before asking a question and accepting random answers. Therefore, I don't think my answer is bad, it's just an answer to a bad question.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc
    Mar 31 at 15:53
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you!! This helps alot
    $endgroup$
    – evgniy tayarov
    Mar 30 at 18:35










  • $begingroup$
    This question just seems to be asking about the existence of a code, not about perfect codes. Your argument shows that a code with these parameters is not perfect, but not that it does not exist.
    $endgroup$
    – Morgan Rodgers
    Mar 31 at 14:51










  • $begingroup$
    @MorganRodgers If the OP leaves the people answering the question to guess what they're talking about, we'll fill in answers as we think is necessary. As the original question didn't seem too complicated, I thought they were talking about perfect codes as such a check is simple and short. If they were not, they should've specified that. If they use this answer even though it might be not what they looking for, then they should read up on the subject before asking a question and accepting random answers. Therefore, I don't think my answer is bad, it's just an answer to a bad question.
    $endgroup$
    – Marc
    Mar 31 at 15:53















$begingroup$
Thank you!! This helps alot
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Mar 30 at 18:35




$begingroup$
Thank you!! This helps alot
$endgroup$
– evgniy tayarov
Mar 30 at 18:35












$begingroup$
This question just seems to be asking about the existence of a code, not about perfect codes. Your argument shows that a code with these parameters is not perfect, but not that it does not exist.
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Mar 31 at 14:51




$begingroup$
This question just seems to be asking about the existence of a code, not about perfect codes. Your argument shows that a code with these parameters is not perfect, but not that it does not exist.
$endgroup$
– Morgan Rodgers
Mar 31 at 14:51












$begingroup$
@MorganRodgers If the OP leaves the people answering the question to guess what they're talking about, we'll fill in answers as we think is necessary. As the original question didn't seem too complicated, I thought they were talking about perfect codes as such a check is simple and short. If they were not, they should've specified that. If they use this answer even though it might be not what they looking for, then they should read up on the subject before asking a question and accepting random answers. Therefore, I don't think my answer is bad, it's just an answer to a bad question.
$endgroup$
– Marc
Mar 31 at 15:53




$begingroup$
@MorganRodgers If the OP leaves the people answering the question to guess what they're talking about, we'll fill in answers as we think is necessary. As the original question didn't seem too complicated, I thought they were talking about perfect codes as such a check is simple and short. If they were not, they should've specified that. If they use this answer even though it might be not what they looking for, then they should read up on the subject before asking a question and accepting random answers. Therefore, I don't think my answer is bad, it's just an answer to a bad question.
$endgroup$
– Marc
Mar 31 at 15:53

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3168573%2fproving-that-there-doesnt-exist-a-binary-code-with-parameters-6-5-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O

Serbia Índice Etimología Historia Geografía Entorno natural División administrativa Política Demografía Economía Cultura Deportes Véase también Notas Referencias Bibliografía Enlaces externos Menú de navegación44°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.46666666666744°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.466666666667U.S. Department of Commerce (2015)«Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2018»Kosovo-Metohija.Neutralna Srbija u NATO okruzenju.The SerbsTheories on the Origin of the Serbs.Serbia.Earls: Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases.Egeo y Balcanes.Kalemegdan.Southern Pannonia during the age of the Great Migrations.Culture in Serbia.History.The Serbian Origin of the Montenegrins.Nemanjics' period (1186-1353).Stefan Uros (1355-1371).Serbian medieval history.Habsburg–Ottoman Wars (1525–1718).The Ottoman Empire, 1700-1922.The First Serbian Uprising.Miloš, prince of Serbia.3. Bosnia-Hercegovina and the Congress of Berlin.The Balkan Wars and the Partition of Macedonia.The Falcon and the Eagle: Montenegro and Austria-Hungary, 1908-1914.Typhus fever on the eastern front in World War I.Anniversary of WWI battle marked in Serbia.La derrota austriaca en los Balcanes. Fin del Imperio Austro-Húngaro.Imperio austriaco y Reino de Hungría.Los tiempos modernos: del capitalismo a la globalización, siglos XVII al XXI.The period of Croatia within ex-Yugoslavia.Yugoslavia: Much in a Name.Las dictaduras europeas.Croacia: mito y realidad."Crods ask arms".Prólogo a la invasión.La campaña de los Balcanes.La resistencia en Yugoslavia.Jasenovac Research Institute.Día en memoria de las víctimas del genocidio en la Segunda Guerra Mundial.El infierno estuvo en Jasenovac.Croacia empieza a «desenterrar» a sus muertos de Jasenovac.World fascism: a historical encyclopedia, Volumen 1.Tito. Josip Broz.El nuevo orden y la resistencia.La conquista del poder.Algunos aspectos de la economía yugoslava a mediados de 1962.Albania-Kosovo crisis.De Kosovo a Kosova: una visión demográfica.La crisis de la economía yugoslava y la política de "estabilización".Milosevic: el poder de un absolutista."Serbia under Milošević: politics in the 1990s"Milosevic cavó en Kosovo la tumba de la antigua Yugoslavia.La ONU exculpa a Serbia de genocidio en la guerra de Bosnia.Slobodan Milosevic, el burócrata que supo usar el odio.Es la fuerza contra el sufrimiento de muchos inocentes.Matanza de civiles al bombardear la OTAN un puente mientras pasaba un tren.Las consecuencias negativas de los bombardeos de Yugoslavia se sentirán aún durante largo tiempo.Kostunica advierte que la misión de Europa en Kosovo es ilegal.Las 24 horas más largas en la vida de Slobodan Milosevic.Serbia declara la guerra a la mafia por matar a Djindjic.Tadic presentará "quizás en diciembre" la solicitud de entrada en la UE.Montenegro declara su independencia de Serbia.Serbia se declara estado soberano tras separación de Montenegro.«Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion)»Mladic pasa por el médico antes de la audiencia para extraditarloDatos de Serbia y Kosovo.The Carpathian Mountains.Position, Relief, Climate.Transport.Finding birds in Serbia.U Srbiji do 2010. godine 10% teritorije nacionalni parkovi.Geography.Serbia: Climate.Variability of Climate In Serbia In The Second Half of The 20thc Entury.BASIC CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE TERRITORY OF SERBIA.Fauna y flora: Serbia.Serbia and Montenegro.Información general sobre Serbia.Republic of Serbia Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA).Serbia recycling 15% of waste.Reform process of the Serbian energy sector.20-MW Wind Project Being Developed in Serbia.Las Naciones Unidas. Paz para Kosovo.Aniversario sin fiesta.Population by national or ethnic groups by Census 2002.Article 7. Coat of arms, flag and national anthem.Serbia, flag of.Historia.«Serbia and Montenegro in Pictures»Serbia.Serbia aprueba su nueva Constitución con un apoyo de más del 50%.Serbia. Population.«El nacionalista Nikolic gana las elecciones presidenciales en Serbia»El europeísta Borís Tadic gana la segunda vuelta de las presidenciales serbias.Aleksandar Vucic, de ultranacionalista serbio a fervoroso europeístaKostunica condena la declaración del "falso estado" de Kosovo.Comienza el debate sobre la independencia de Kosovo en el TIJ.La Corte Internacional de Justicia dice que Kosovo no violó el derecho internacional al declarar su independenciaKosovo: Enviado de la ONU advierte tensiones y fragilidad.«Bruselas recomienda negociar la adhesión de Serbia tras el acuerdo sobre Kosovo»Monografía de Serbia.Bez smanjivanja Vojske Srbije.Military statistics Serbia and Montenegro.Šutanovac: Vojni budžet za 2009. godinu 70 milijardi dinara.Serbia-Montenegro shortens obligatory military service to six months.No hay justicia para las víctimas de los bombardeos de la OTAN.Zapatero reitera la negativa de España a reconocer la independencia de Kosovo.Anniversary of the signing of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement.Detenido en Serbia Radovan Karadzic, el criminal de guerra más buscado de Europa."Serbia presentará su candidatura de acceso a la UE antes de fin de año".Serbia solicita la adhesión a la UE.Detenido el exgeneral serbobosnio Ratko Mladic, principal acusado del genocidio en los Balcanes«Lista de todos los Estados Miembros de las Naciones Unidas que son parte o signatarios en los diversos instrumentos de derechos humanos de las Naciones Unidas»versión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre la Eliminación de todas las Formas de Discriminación contra la MujerConvención contra la tortura y otros tratos o penas crueles, inhumanos o degradantesversión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con DiscapacidadEl ACNUR recibe con beneplácito el envío de tropas de la OTAN a Kosovo y se prepara ante una posible llegada de refugiados a Serbia.Kosovo.- El jefe de la Minuk denuncia que los serbios boicotearon las legislativas por 'presiones'.Bosnia and Herzegovina. Population.Datos básicos de Montenegro, historia y evolución política.Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa global de fecundidad (por 1000 habitantes).Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa bruta de mortalidad (por 1000 habitantes).Population.Falleció el patriarca de la Iglesia Ortodoxa serbia.Atacan en Kosovo autobuses con peregrinos tras la investidura del patriarca serbio IrinejSerbian in Hungary.Tasas de cambio."Kosovo es de todos sus ciudadanos".Report for Serbia.Country groups by income.GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA 1997–2007.Economic Trends in the Republic of Serbia 2006.National Accounts Statitics.Саопштења за јавност.GDP per inhabitant varied by one to six across the EU27 Member States.Un pacto de estabilidad para Serbia.Unemployment rate rises in Serbia.Serbia, Belarus agree free trade to woo investors.Serbia, Turkey call investors to Serbia.Success Stories.U.S. Private Investment in Serbia and Montenegro.Positive trend.Banks in Serbia.La Cámara de Comercio acompaña a empresas madrileñas a Serbia y Croacia.Serbia Industries.Energy and mining.Agriculture.Late crops, fruit and grapes output, 2008.Rebranding Serbia: A Hobby Shortly to Become a Full-Time Job.Final data on livestock statistics, 2008.Serbian cell-phone users.U Srbiji sve više računara.Телекомуникације.U Srbiji 27 odsto gradjana koristi Internet.Serbia and Montenegro.Тренд гледаности програма РТС-а у 2008. и 2009.години.Serbian railways.General Terms.El mercado del transporte aéreo en Serbia.Statistics.Vehículos de motor registrados.Planes ambiciosos para el transporte fluvial.Turismo.Turistički promet u Republici Srbiji u periodu januar-novembar 2007. godine.Your Guide to Culture.Novi Sad - city of culture.Nis - european crossroads.Serbia. Properties inscribed on the World Heritage List .Stari Ras and Sopoćani.Studenica Monastery.Medieval Monuments in Kosovo.Gamzigrad-Romuliana, Palace of Galerius.Skiing and snowboarding in Kopaonik.Tara.New7Wonders of Nature Finalists.Pilgrimage of Saint Sava.Exit Festival: Best european festival.Banje u Srbiji.«The Encyclopedia of world history»Culture.Centenario del arte serbio.«Djordje Andrejevic Kun: el único pintor de los brigadistas yugoslavos de la guerra civil española»About the museum.The collections.Miroslav Gospel – Manuscript from 1180.Historicity in the Serbo-Croatian Heroic Epic.Culture and Sport.Conversación con el rector del Seminario San Sava.'Reina Margot' funde drama, historia y gesto con música de Goran Bregovic.Serbia gana Eurovisión y España decepciona de nuevo con un vigésimo puesto.Home.Story.Emir Kusturica.Tercer oro para Paskaljevic.Nikola Tesla Year.Home.Tesla, un genio tomado por loco.Aniversario de la muerte de Nikola Tesla.El Museo Nikola Tesla en Belgrado.El inventor del mundo actual.República de Serbia.University of Belgrade official statistics.University of Novi Sad.University of Kragujevac.University of Nis.Comida. Cocina serbia.Cooking.Montenegro se convertirá en el miembro 204 del movimiento olímpico.España, campeona de Europa de baloncesto.El Partizan de Belgrado se corona campeón por octava vez consecutiva.Serbia se clasifica para el Mundial de 2010 de Sudáfrica.Serbia Name Squad For Northern Ireland And South Korea Tests.Fútbol.- El Partizán de Belgrado se proclama campeón de la Liga serbia.Clasificacion final Mundial de balonmano Croacia 2009.Serbia vence a España y se consagra campeón mundial de waterpolo.Novak Djokovic no convence pero gana en Australia.Gana Ana Ivanovic el Roland Garros.Serena Williams gana el US Open por tercera vez.Biography.Bradt Travel Guide SerbiaThe Encyclopedia of World War IGobierno de SerbiaPortal del Gobierno de SerbiaPresidencia de SerbiaAsamblea Nacional SerbiaMinisterio de Asuntos exteriores de SerbiaBanco Nacional de SerbiaAgencia Serbia para la Promoción de la Inversión y la ExportaciónOficina de Estadísticas de SerbiaCIA. Factbook 2008Organización nacional de turismo de SerbiaDiscover SerbiaConoce SerbiaNoticias de SerbiaSerbiaWorldCat1512028760000 0000 9526 67094054598-2n8519591900570825ge1309191004530741010url17413117006669D055771Serbia