Solve the equation $frac7x^2 - x + 4sqrt3x^2 - 1 + sqrtx^2 - x - xsqrtx^2 + 1 = 22$. [closed]How can we solve: $sqrtx - ln(x) -1 = 0$?Solve the following inequality $x^2+x+1gt 0$How do we solve the equation?Is$fracsqrtasqrtb$ the same as $sqrtfracab$?Solving an equation over the reals: $ x^3 + 1 = 2sqrt[3]2x - 1$Solving the simultaneous equationHow to solve $x$ for which $dfracx-5x = left(dfrac5xright)^sqrt2x+2$Solve the inequality $sqrt x + 2 - sqrt x + 3 < sqrt 2 - sqrt 3$Solve the equation $x^2-9sqrtx+14=0$Solve the following equation: $sqrt4x^2 - 15x + 20 = 4x - 10 + 7sqrtx - 1$.
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Theorems that impeded progress
Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)
Can divisibility rules for digits be generalized to sum of digits
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
Writing rule stating superpower from different root cause is bad writing
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
How to write a macro that is braces sensitive?
Characters won't fit in table
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
What do three bars across the stem of a note mean?
Pattern match does not work in bash script
Test if tikzmark exists on same page
Schoenfled Residua test shows proportionality hazard assumptions holds but Kaplan-Meier plots intersect
Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?
What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?
Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?
String Manipulation Interpreter
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
Solve the equation $frac7x^2 - x + 4sqrt3x^2 - 1 + sqrtx^2 - x - xsqrtx^2 + 1 = 22$. [closed]
How can we solve: $sqrtx - ln(x) -1 = 0$?Solve the following inequality $x^2+x+1gt 0$How do we solve the equation?Is$fracsqrtasqrtb$ the same as $sqrtfracab$?Solving an equation over the reals: $ x^3 + 1 = 2sqrt[3]2x - 1$Solving the simultaneous equationHow to solve $x$ for which $dfracx-5x = left(dfrac5xright)^sqrt2x+2$Solve the inequality $sqrt x + 2 - sqrt x + 3 < sqrt 2 - sqrt 3$Solve the equation $x^2-9sqrtx+14=0$Solve the following equation: $sqrt4x^2 - 15x + 20 = 4x - 10 + 7sqrtx - 1$.
$begingroup$
Solve the equation $dfrac7x^2 - x + 4sqrt3x^2 - 1 + sqrtx^2 - x - xsqrtx^2 + 1 = 22$ over the reals.
WolframAlpha
tells me that there aren't any real solutions. I am thinking of a solution involving inequalities. (Obviously, that is not always the correct approach.)
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Saad, dantopa, Adrian Keister, Dr. Mathva, John Omielan Mar 29 at 22:03
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, dantopa, Adrian Keister, Dr. Mathva, John Omielan
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Solve the equation $dfrac7x^2 - x + 4sqrt3x^2 - 1 + sqrtx^2 - x - xsqrtx^2 + 1 = 22$ over the reals.
WolframAlpha
tells me that there aren't any real solutions. I am thinking of a solution involving inequalities. (Obviously, that is not always the correct approach.)
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Saad, dantopa, Adrian Keister, Dr. Mathva, John Omielan Mar 29 at 22:03
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, dantopa, Adrian Keister, Dr. Mathva, John Omielan
1
$begingroup$
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. In particular, please give the source of the problem and explain why it is of interest.
$endgroup$
– Carl Mummert
Mar 29 at 15:16
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean with "a solution involving inequalities"? And why do you expect to be able to find (real) solutions, when WA tells you there aren't any?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Mar 29 at 15:16
1
$begingroup$
Can you provide the source for this problem? In particular, is there any reason you expect there to be a "nice" (non-numerical) solution to prove there are no real solutions?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:17
$begingroup$
@StackTD: I think the OP just means being able to bound the quantity below by some number strictly greater than $22$.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:18
$begingroup$
There are only complex solutions
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 29 at 15:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Solve the equation $dfrac7x^2 - x + 4sqrt3x^2 - 1 + sqrtx^2 - x - xsqrtx^2 + 1 = 22$ over the reals.
WolframAlpha
tells me that there aren't any real solutions. I am thinking of a solution involving inequalities. (Obviously, that is not always the correct approach.)
algebra-precalculus
$endgroup$
Solve the equation $dfrac7x^2 - x + 4sqrt3x^2 - 1 + sqrtx^2 - x - xsqrtx^2 + 1 = 22$ over the reals.
WolframAlpha
tells me that there aren't any real solutions. I am thinking of a solution involving inequalities. (Obviously, that is not always the correct approach.)
algebra-precalculus
algebra-precalculus
edited Mar 29 at 15:16
Clayton
19.6k33288
19.6k33288
asked Mar 29 at 15:14
Lê Thành ĐạtLê Thành Đạt
47013
47013
closed as off-topic by Saad, dantopa, Adrian Keister, Dr. Mathva, John Omielan Mar 29 at 22:03
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, dantopa, Adrian Keister, Dr. Mathva, John Omielan
closed as off-topic by Saad, dantopa, Adrian Keister, Dr. Mathva, John Omielan Mar 29 at 22:03
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, dantopa, Adrian Keister, Dr. Mathva, John Omielan
1
$begingroup$
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. In particular, please give the source of the problem and explain why it is of interest.
$endgroup$
– Carl Mummert
Mar 29 at 15:16
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean with "a solution involving inequalities"? And why do you expect to be able to find (real) solutions, when WA tells you there aren't any?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Mar 29 at 15:16
1
$begingroup$
Can you provide the source for this problem? In particular, is there any reason you expect there to be a "nice" (non-numerical) solution to prove there are no real solutions?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:17
$begingroup$
@StackTD: I think the OP just means being able to bound the quantity below by some number strictly greater than $22$.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:18
$begingroup$
There are only complex solutions
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 29 at 15:50
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. In particular, please give the source of the problem and explain why it is of interest.
$endgroup$
– Carl Mummert
Mar 29 at 15:16
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean with "a solution involving inequalities"? And why do you expect to be able to find (real) solutions, when WA tells you there aren't any?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Mar 29 at 15:16
1
$begingroup$
Can you provide the source for this problem? In particular, is there any reason you expect there to be a "nice" (non-numerical) solution to prove there are no real solutions?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:17
$begingroup$
@StackTD: I think the OP just means being able to bound the quantity below by some number strictly greater than $22$.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:18
$begingroup$
There are only complex solutions
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 29 at 15:50
1
1
$begingroup$
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. In particular, please give the source of the problem and explain why it is of interest.
$endgroup$
– Carl Mummert
Mar 29 at 15:16
$begingroup$
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. In particular, please give the source of the problem and explain why it is of interest.
$endgroup$
– Carl Mummert
Mar 29 at 15:16
3
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean with "a solution involving inequalities"? And why do you expect to be able to find (real) solutions, when WA tells you there aren't any?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Mar 29 at 15:16
$begingroup$
What do you mean with "a solution involving inequalities"? And why do you expect to be able to find (real) solutions, when WA tells you there aren't any?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Mar 29 at 15:16
1
1
$begingroup$
Can you provide the source for this problem? In particular, is there any reason you expect there to be a "nice" (non-numerical) solution to prove there are no real solutions?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:17
$begingroup$
Can you provide the source for this problem? In particular, is there any reason you expect there to be a "nice" (non-numerical) solution to prove there are no real solutions?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:17
$begingroup$
@StackTD: I think the OP just means being able to bound the quantity below by some number strictly greater than $22$.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:18
$begingroup$
@StackTD: I think the OP just means being able to bound the quantity below by some number strictly greater than $22$.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:18
$begingroup$
There are only complex solutions
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 29 at 15:50
$begingroup$
There are only complex solutions
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 29 at 15:50
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
1
$begingroup$
This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. In particular, please give the source of the problem and explain why it is of interest.
$endgroup$
– Carl Mummert
Mar 29 at 15:16
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean with "a solution involving inequalities"? And why do you expect to be able to find (real) solutions, when WA tells you there aren't any?
$endgroup$
– StackTD
Mar 29 at 15:16
1
$begingroup$
Can you provide the source for this problem? In particular, is there any reason you expect there to be a "nice" (non-numerical) solution to prove there are no real solutions?
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:17
$begingroup$
@StackTD: I think the OP just means being able to bound the quantity below by some number strictly greater than $22$.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Mar 29 at 15:18
$begingroup$
There are only complex solutions
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Mar 29 at 15:50