Baire Property on Baire Spaces (Kechris' book)Concrete example of the property of Baire on a finite discrete spaceQuestion about of Baire property and Baire spaceThe inverse image of dense set is dense and of a comeager set is comeager?.Every comeager set in a perfect Polish space contains an uncountable dense $G_delta$ setQuestion about comeager set in a Polish spaceAnalytic sets have perfect set property (Kechris)Continuous image of a Polish space to another has the Baire propertyIs a weak basis of a topological space a basis and vice versa? (Kechris' book)Theorem $(8.29)$ (Kechris)The canonical open set which is equal to a set with the BP modulo meager sets is regular open (Kechris)

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?

Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Minkowski space

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

Mage Armor with Defense fighting style (for Adventurers League bladeslinger)

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

Which models of the Boeing 737 are still in production?

Collect Fourier series terms

Test if tikzmark exists on same page

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

What's the output of a record cartridge playing an out-of-speed record

Font hinting is lost in Chrome-like browsers (for some languages )

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Is a conference paper whose proceedings will be published in IEEE Xplore counted as a publication?

Today is the Center

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

Modeling an IP Address



Baire Property on Baire Spaces (Kechris' book)


Concrete example of the property of Baire on a finite discrete spaceQuestion about of Baire property and Baire spaceThe inverse image of dense set is dense and of a comeager set is comeager?.Every comeager set in a perfect Polish space contains an uncountable dense $G_delta$ setQuestion about comeager set in a Polish spaceAnalytic sets have perfect set property (Kechris)Continuous image of a Polish space to another has the Baire propertyIs a weak basis of a topological space a basis and vice versa? (Kechris' book)Theorem $(8.29)$ (Kechris)The canonical open set which is equal to a set with the BP modulo meager sets is regular open (Kechris)













3












$begingroup$


Kechris states the following result in "Classical Descriptive Set Theory", pp. $48$:




($boldsymbol8.26$) Proposition
Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose that $Asubseteq X$ has the BP (Baire Property).
Then either $A$ is meager or there is a nonempty open set $Usubseteq X$ s.t. $A$ is comeager in $U$.



If $X$ is a Baire space, exactly one of these alternatives holds.




Well, I'm not able to prove the last assertion. I've worked on it for some time and maybe I can't something different from what I have already tried (I think the proof is very elementary).



For the convenience of the reader, I recall that




$A$ has the BP iff there is an open set $Usubseteq X$ s.t. the symmetric difference $Atriangle U$ is meager;



$X$ is a Baire space If it satisfies one of the following equivalent conditions:
(i) every nonempty open set in $X$ is non-meager;
(ii) every comeager set in $X$ is dense;
(iii) the intersection of countably many dense open sets on $X$ is dense.




Thank you in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    Kechris states the following result in "Classical Descriptive Set Theory", pp. $48$:




    ($boldsymbol8.26$) Proposition
    Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose that $Asubseteq X$ has the BP (Baire Property).
    Then either $A$ is meager or there is a nonempty open set $Usubseteq X$ s.t. $A$ is comeager in $U$.



    If $X$ is a Baire space, exactly one of these alternatives holds.




    Well, I'm not able to prove the last assertion. I've worked on it for some time and maybe I can't something different from what I have already tried (I think the proof is very elementary).



    For the convenience of the reader, I recall that




    $A$ has the BP iff there is an open set $Usubseteq X$ s.t. the symmetric difference $Atriangle U$ is meager;



    $X$ is a Baire space If it satisfies one of the following equivalent conditions:
    (i) every nonempty open set in $X$ is non-meager;
    (ii) every comeager set in $X$ is dense;
    (iii) the intersection of countably many dense open sets on $X$ is dense.




    Thank you in advance for your help.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Kechris states the following result in "Classical Descriptive Set Theory", pp. $48$:




      ($boldsymbol8.26$) Proposition
      Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose that $Asubseteq X$ has the BP (Baire Property).
      Then either $A$ is meager or there is a nonempty open set $Usubseteq X$ s.t. $A$ is comeager in $U$.



      If $X$ is a Baire space, exactly one of these alternatives holds.




      Well, I'm not able to prove the last assertion. I've worked on it for some time and maybe I can't something different from what I have already tried (I think the proof is very elementary).



      For the convenience of the reader, I recall that




      $A$ has the BP iff there is an open set $Usubseteq X$ s.t. the symmetric difference $Atriangle U$ is meager;



      $X$ is a Baire space If it satisfies one of the following equivalent conditions:
      (i) every nonempty open set in $X$ is non-meager;
      (ii) every comeager set in $X$ is dense;
      (iii) the intersection of countably many dense open sets on $X$ is dense.




      Thank you in advance for your help.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Kechris states the following result in "Classical Descriptive Set Theory", pp. $48$:




      ($boldsymbol8.26$) Proposition
      Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose that $Asubseteq X$ has the BP (Baire Property).
      Then either $A$ is meager or there is a nonempty open set $Usubseteq X$ s.t. $A$ is comeager in $U$.



      If $X$ is a Baire space, exactly one of these alternatives holds.




      Well, I'm not able to prove the last assertion. I've worked on it for some time and maybe I can't something different from what I have already tried (I think the proof is very elementary).



      For the convenience of the reader, I recall that




      $A$ has the BP iff there is an open set $Usubseteq X$ s.t. the symmetric difference $Atriangle U$ is meager;



      $X$ is a Baire space If it satisfies one of the following equivalent conditions:
      (i) every nonempty open set in $X$ is non-meager;
      (ii) every comeager set in $X$ is dense;
      (iii) the intersection of countably many dense open sets on $X$ is dense.




      Thank you in advance for your help.







      general-topology descriptive-set-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 2 at 8:28









      Henno Brandsma

      115k349125




      115k349125










      asked Mar 29 at 12:25









      LBJFSLBJFS

      367112




      367112




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          If you've already proved the first assertion, then the second assertion just says that a meager set $A$ can't be comeager in a nonempty open set $U$. Well, suppose $A$ is meager, $U$ is nonempty and open, and $U-A$ is meager. Then $U$, being included in the union of two meager sets $A$ and $U-A$, is meager, contrary to the assumption that $X$ is a Baire space.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I thought that it was simple, but this is a great blunder! I would like to thank you for this proof... I was in trouble at that moment :)
            $endgroup$
            – LBJFS
            Mar 29 at 19:02











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167092%2fbaire-property-on-baire-spaces-kechris-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          If you've already proved the first assertion, then the second assertion just says that a meager set $A$ can't be comeager in a nonempty open set $U$. Well, suppose $A$ is meager, $U$ is nonempty and open, and $U-A$ is meager. Then $U$, being included in the union of two meager sets $A$ and $U-A$, is meager, contrary to the assumption that $X$ is a Baire space.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I thought that it was simple, but this is a great blunder! I would like to thank you for this proof... I was in trouble at that moment :)
            $endgroup$
            – LBJFS
            Mar 29 at 19:02















          3












          $begingroup$

          If you've already proved the first assertion, then the second assertion just says that a meager set $A$ can't be comeager in a nonempty open set $U$. Well, suppose $A$ is meager, $U$ is nonempty and open, and $U-A$ is meager. Then $U$, being included in the union of two meager sets $A$ and $U-A$, is meager, contrary to the assumption that $X$ is a Baire space.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I thought that it was simple, but this is a great blunder! I would like to thank you for this proof... I was in trouble at that moment :)
            $endgroup$
            – LBJFS
            Mar 29 at 19:02













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          If you've already proved the first assertion, then the second assertion just says that a meager set $A$ can't be comeager in a nonempty open set $U$. Well, suppose $A$ is meager, $U$ is nonempty and open, and $U-A$ is meager. Then $U$, being included in the union of two meager sets $A$ and $U-A$, is meager, contrary to the assumption that $X$ is a Baire space.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If you've already proved the first assertion, then the second assertion just says that a meager set $A$ can't be comeager in a nonempty open set $U$. Well, suppose $A$ is meager, $U$ is nonempty and open, and $U-A$ is meager. Then $U$, being included in the union of two meager sets $A$ and $U-A$, is meager, contrary to the assumption that $X$ is a Baire space.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 29 at 16:00









          Andreas BlassAndreas Blass

          50.5k452109




          50.5k452109











          • $begingroup$
            I thought that it was simple, but this is a great blunder! I would like to thank you for this proof... I was in trouble at that moment :)
            $endgroup$
            – LBJFS
            Mar 29 at 19:02
















          • $begingroup$
            I thought that it was simple, but this is a great blunder! I would like to thank you for this proof... I was in trouble at that moment :)
            $endgroup$
            – LBJFS
            Mar 29 at 19:02















          $begingroup$
          I thought that it was simple, but this is a great blunder! I would like to thank you for this proof... I was in trouble at that moment :)
          $endgroup$
          – LBJFS
          Mar 29 at 19:02




          $begingroup$
          I thought that it was simple, but this is a great blunder! I would like to thank you for this proof... I was in trouble at that moment :)
          $endgroup$
          – LBJFS
          Mar 29 at 19:02

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167092%2fbaire-property-on-baire-spaces-kechris-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

          Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleaguesHow can I better understand manager or clients with strong accents?Adding more movement and speech at the fundamental level to a highly-sedentary job?Difficulty in understanding Manager's accent(language and communication)How to adjust yourself where your colleagues are not understanding to you?Understanding manager's expectationsForeigner and colleagues using slangHaving difficulty understanding meetingsHow do you breathe when giving a speech?Trouble Waking Up for Emergencies (On-Call)Problems with colleaguesColleagues feeling insecure when I do my work

          Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O