Show that a process is a local martingale The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Show that this continuous local martingale is a martingaleForming a local martingale with continuous increasing processlocal martingale bounded below by a DL processIs this process a martingale?Can Local Martingales be characterized only using their FV process and BM?Stopped local martingale as a martingaleHow can I show that the stochastic integral of a jump process w.r.t. Brownian motion is a local martingale by using this special localizing sequence?Show a Continuous Local Martingale is a MartingaleHow to prove that the process $Y_t$ is martingale?Second order derivatives in Ito formula for Brownian motion and local martingale

How to pronounce 1ターン?

How to test the equality of two Pearson correlation coefficients computed from the same sample?

Can undead you have reanimated wait inside a portable hole?

Why did all the guest students take carriages to the Yule Ball?

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Who or what is the being for whom Being is a question for Heidegger?

Simulation of a banking system with an Account class in C++

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

How to copy the contents of all files with a certain name into a new file?

Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

How to delete random line from file using Unix command?

Derivation tree not rendering

He got a vote 80% that of Emmanuel Macron’s

How to stretch delimiters to envolve matrices inside of a kbordermatrix?

Cooking pasta in a water boiler

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Segmentation fault output is suppressed when piping stdin into a function. Why?

How does ice melt when immersed in water?



Show that a process is a local martingale



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Show that this continuous local martingale is a martingaleForming a local martingale with continuous increasing processlocal martingale bounded below by a DL processIs this process a martingale?Can Local Martingales be characterized only using their FV process and BM?Stopped local martingale as a martingaleHow can I show that the stochastic integral of a jump process w.r.t. Brownian motion is a local martingale by using this special localizing sequence?Show a Continuous Local Martingale is a MartingaleHow to prove that the process $Y_t$ is martingale?Second order derivatives in Ito formula for Brownian motion and local martingale










0












$begingroup$


We have the following setting




We have a 2-dimensional Brownian motion $(X,Y)$, and we define the process $M_t$ as $$M_t=e^X_tcos(Y_t)$$




The problem is to show that the process $M_t$ is a local martingale, and that we have that $$langle Mrangle_t=int^t_0e^X_sds$$



I know that $M_t$ would be a local martingale if it is a continuous, adapted process and if there exists a sequence of stopping times $(tau_n)_ngeq0$, such that $tau_nuparrowinfty$ almost surely, and that $(M_tau_nwedge t-M_0)_tgeq0$ is a uniformly integrable martingale for all $n$.



However, I am not aware of any straight forward way to proving that something is a local martingale, and I do not see an easy approach to proving it directly from the definition. Are there ''standard'' routes to follow when trying to prove that a process is/isn't a local martingale?



Moreover, when trying to show that the quadratic variation of $M$ can be written in such a way, I cannot figure out why the cosine term would drop out.



Any help is appreciated!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    We have the following setting




    We have a 2-dimensional Brownian motion $(X,Y)$, and we define the process $M_t$ as $$M_t=e^X_tcos(Y_t)$$




    The problem is to show that the process $M_t$ is a local martingale, and that we have that $$langle Mrangle_t=int^t_0e^X_sds$$



    I know that $M_t$ would be a local martingale if it is a continuous, adapted process and if there exists a sequence of stopping times $(tau_n)_ngeq0$, such that $tau_nuparrowinfty$ almost surely, and that $(M_tau_nwedge t-M_0)_tgeq0$ is a uniformly integrable martingale for all $n$.



    However, I am not aware of any straight forward way to proving that something is a local martingale, and I do not see an easy approach to proving it directly from the definition. Are there ''standard'' routes to follow when trying to prove that a process is/isn't a local martingale?



    Moreover, when trying to show that the quadratic variation of $M$ can be written in such a way, I cannot figure out why the cosine term would drop out.



    Any help is appreciated!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      We have the following setting




      We have a 2-dimensional Brownian motion $(X,Y)$, and we define the process $M_t$ as $$M_t=e^X_tcos(Y_t)$$




      The problem is to show that the process $M_t$ is a local martingale, and that we have that $$langle Mrangle_t=int^t_0e^X_sds$$



      I know that $M_t$ would be a local martingale if it is a continuous, adapted process and if there exists a sequence of stopping times $(tau_n)_ngeq0$, such that $tau_nuparrowinfty$ almost surely, and that $(M_tau_nwedge t-M_0)_tgeq0$ is a uniformly integrable martingale for all $n$.



      However, I am not aware of any straight forward way to proving that something is a local martingale, and I do not see an easy approach to proving it directly from the definition. Are there ''standard'' routes to follow when trying to prove that a process is/isn't a local martingale?



      Moreover, when trying to show that the quadratic variation of $M$ can be written in such a way, I cannot figure out why the cosine term would drop out.



      Any help is appreciated!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      We have the following setting




      We have a 2-dimensional Brownian motion $(X,Y)$, and we define the process $M_t$ as $$M_t=e^X_tcos(Y_t)$$




      The problem is to show that the process $M_t$ is a local martingale, and that we have that $$langle Mrangle_t=int^t_0e^X_sds$$



      I know that $M_t$ would be a local martingale if it is a continuous, adapted process and if there exists a sequence of stopping times $(tau_n)_ngeq0$, such that $tau_nuparrowinfty$ almost surely, and that $(M_tau_nwedge t-M_0)_tgeq0$ is a uniformly integrable martingale for all $n$.



      However, I am not aware of any straight forward way to proving that something is a local martingale, and I do not see an easy approach to proving it directly from the definition. Are there ''standard'' routes to follow when trying to prove that a process is/isn't a local martingale?



      Moreover, when trying to show that the quadratic variation of $M$ can be written in such a way, I cannot figure out why the cosine term would drop out.



      Any help is appreciated!







      probability-theory stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus martingales local-martingales






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 31 at 15:18







      S. Crim

















      asked Mar 31 at 14:33









      S. CrimS. Crim

      4081212




      4081212




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          If we apply Ito's lemma to the function $f(x,y) = e^x cos(y)$ you'll find that
          $$dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$$
          since $langle X rangle_t = langle Y rangle_t = t$ and $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$. Since the stochastic integral against a continuous local martingale is again a local martingale, this shows that $M_t$ is a continuous local martingale. We also deduce from this that
          $$d langle M rangle_t = M_t^2 d langle X rangle_t + e^2X_t sin(Y_t)^2 dlangle X rangle_t = e^2X_t (cos^2(Y_t) + sin^2(Y_t))dt = e^2X_t dt$$
          (where we have again used that $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$) and so
          $$langle M rangle_t = int_0^t e^2X_s ds$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Sure. Written out fully $dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$ means $M_t - M_0 = int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s$ and so $langle M rangle_t = bigg langle int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s bigg rangle_t$. Now use bilinearity and symmetry of the quadratic variation since $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ for continuous local martingale $N,K$ and an adapted process $F$ such that $int F dN$ makes sense. Note that we don't get any cross terms between $X$ and $Y$ since $langle X,Y rangle =0$
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:22







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've just seen the edit to your comment. It looks like you didn't know about the behaviour of the Ito integral with respect to the quadratic variation. This is an important property to keep in mind. In fact $int_0^t F_s dN_s$ is the unique process such that for all continuous local martingales $K_t$ we have $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ (and one can even use this observation to give an alternative construction of the Ito integral).
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:25







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oh shoot, the $t$ in my comment should be a $cdot$, I just copy-pasted that expression and forgot to change it. The thing inside the covariation should always be a process and not a fixed random variable; that $cdot$ just means you consider the integral as a process and not the integral at any fixed time. You're completely right to point this out. Sorry for the source of confusion.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:40







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It's nothing to do with that. Try applying Ito's lemma to both of them and then use the resulting formula to compute the covariation. Recall that $langle X,Y rangle = 0$ and that if $V_t$ is a finite variation process then $langle M,V rangle = 0$ for any semimartingale $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:08






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In general, when you see a function of a continuous local martingale (/semimartingale) then you should almost immediately try seeing if applying Ito's lemma can help you.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:10











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169450%2fshow-that-a-process-is-a-local-martingale%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          If we apply Ito's lemma to the function $f(x,y) = e^x cos(y)$ you'll find that
          $$dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$$
          since $langle X rangle_t = langle Y rangle_t = t$ and $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$. Since the stochastic integral against a continuous local martingale is again a local martingale, this shows that $M_t$ is a continuous local martingale. We also deduce from this that
          $$d langle M rangle_t = M_t^2 d langle X rangle_t + e^2X_t sin(Y_t)^2 dlangle X rangle_t = e^2X_t (cos^2(Y_t) + sin^2(Y_t))dt = e^2X_t dt$$
          (where we have again used that $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$) and so
          $$langle M rangle_t = int_0^t e^2X_s ds$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Sure. Written out fully $dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$ means $M_t - M_0 = int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s$ and so $langle M rangle_t = bigg langle int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s bigg rangle_t$. Now use bilinearity and symmetry of the quadratic variation since $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ for continuous local martingale $N,K$ and an adapted process $F$ such that $int F dN$ makes sense. Note that we don't get any cross terms between $X$ and $Y$ since $langle X,Y rangle =0$
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:22







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've just seen the edit to your comment. It looks like you didn't know about the behaviour of the Ito integral with respect to the quadratic variation. This is an important property to keep in mind. In fact $int_0^t F_s dN_s$ is the unique process such that for all continuous local martingales $K_t$ we have $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ (and one can even use this observation to give an alternative construction of the Ito integral).
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:25







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oh shoot, the $t$ in my comment should be a $cdot$, I just copy-pasted that expression and forgot to change it. The thing inside the covariation should always be a process and not a fixed random variable; that $cdot$ just means you consider the integral as a process and not the integral at any fixed time. You're completely right to point this out. Sorry for the source of confusion.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:40







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It's nothing to do with that. Try applying Ito's lemma to both of them and then use the resulting formula to compute the covariation. Recall that $langle X,Y rangle = 0$ and that if $V_t$ is a finite variation process then $langle M,V rangle = 0$ for any semimartingale $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:08






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In general, when you see a function of a continuous local martingale (/semimartingale) then you should almost immediately try seeing if applying Ito's lemma can help you.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:10















          1












          $begingroup$

          If we apply Ito's lemma to the function $f(x,y) = e^x cos(y)$ you'll find that
          $$dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$$
          since $langle X rangle_t = langle Y rangle_t = t$ and $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$. Since the stochastic integral against a continuous local martingale is again a local martingale, this shows that $M_t$ is a continuous local martingale. We also deduce from this that
          $$d langle M rangle_t = M_t^2 d langle X rangle_t + e^2X_t sin(Y_t)^2 dlangle X rangle_t = e^2X_t (cos^2(Y_t) + sin^2(Y_t))dt = e^2X_t dt$$
          (where we have again used that $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$) and so
          $$langle M rangle_t = int_0^t e^2X_s ds$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Sure. Written out fully $dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$ means $M_t - M_0 = int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s$ and so $langle M rangle_t = bigg langle int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s bigg rangle_t$. Now use bilinearity and symmetry of the quadratic variation since $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ for continuous local martingale $N,K$ and an adapted process $F$ such that $int F dN$ makes sense. Note that we don't get any cross terms between $X$ and $Y$ since $langle X,Y rangle =0$
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:22







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've just seen the edit to your comment. It looks like you didn't know about the behaviour of the Ito integral with respect to the quadratic variation. This is an important property to keep in mind. In fact $int_0^t F_s dN_s$ is the unique process such that for all continuous local martingales $K_t$ we have $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ (and one can even use this observation to give an alternative construction of the Ito integral).
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:25







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oh shoot, the $t$ in my comment should be a $cdot$, I just copy-pasted that expression and forgot to change it. The thing inside the covariation should always be a process and not a fixed random variable; that $cdot$ just means you consider the integral as a process and not the integral at any fixed time. You're completely right to point this out. Sorry for the source of confusion.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:40







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It's nothing to do with that. Try applying Ito's lemma to both of them and then use the resulting formula to compute the covariation. Recall that $langle X,Y rangle = 0$ and that if $V_t$ is a finite variation process then $langle M,V rangle = 0$ for any semimartingale $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:08






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In general, when you see a function of a continuous local martingale (/semimartingale) then you should almost immediately try seeing if applying Ito's lemma can help you.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:10













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          If we apply Ito's lemma to the function $f(x,y) = e^x cos(y)$ you'll find that
          $$dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$$
          since $langle X rangle_t = langle Y rangle_t = t$ and $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$. Since the stochastic integral against a continuous local martingale is again a local martingale, this shows that $M_t$ is a continuous local martingale. We also deduce from this that
          $$d langle M rangle_t = M_t^2 d langle X rangle_t + e^2X_t sin(Y_t)^2 dlangle X rangle_t = e^2X_t (cos^2(Y_t) + sin^2(Y_t))dt = e^2X_t dt$$
          (where we have again used that $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$) and so
          $$langle M rangle_t = int_0^t e^2X_s ds$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If we apply Ito's lemma to the function $f(x,y) = e^x cos(y)$ you'll find that
          $$dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$$
          since $langle X rangle_t = langle Y rangle_t = t$ and $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$. Since the stochastic integral against a continuous local martingale is again a local martingale, this shows that $M_t$ is a continuous local martingale. We also deduce from this that
          $$d langle M rangle_t = M_t^2 d langle X rangle_t + e^2X_t sin(Y_t)^2 dlangle X rangle_t = e^2X_t (cos^2(Y_t) + sin^2(Y_t))dt = e^2X_t dt$$
          (where we have again used that $langle X,Y rangle_t = 0$) and so
          $$langle M rangle_t = int_0^t e^2X_s ds$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 31 at 21:56









          Rhys SteeleRhys Steele

          7,9051931




          7,9051931







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Sure. Written out fully $dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$ means $M_t - M_0 = int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s$ and so $langle M rangle_t = bigg langle int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s bigg rangle_t$. Now use bilinearity and symmetry of the quadratic variation since $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ for continuous local martingale $N,K$ and an adapted process $F$ such that $int F dN$ makes sense. Note that we don't get any cross terms between $X$ and $Y$ since $langle X,Y rangle =0$
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:22







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've just seen the edit to your comment. It looks like you didn't know about the behaviour of the Ito integral with respect to the quadratic variation. This is an important property to keep in mind. In fact $int_0^t F_s dN_s$ is the unique process such that for all continuous local martingales $K_t$ we have $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ (and one can even use this observation to give an alternative construction of the Ito integral).
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:25







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oh shoot, the $t$ in my comment should be a $cdot$, I just copy-pasted that expression and forgot to change it. The thing inside the covariation should always be a process and not a fixed random variable; that $cdot$ just means you consider the integral as a process and not the integral at any fixed time. You're completely right to point this out. Sorry for the source of confusion.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:40







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It's nothing to do with that. Try applying Ito's lemma to both of them and then use the resulting formula to compute the covariation. Recall that $langle X,Y rangle = 0$ and that if $V_t$ is a finite variation process then $langle M,V rangle = 0$ for any semimartingale $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:08






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In general, when you see a function of a continuous local martingale (/semimartingale) then you should almost immediately try seeing if applying Ito's lemma can help you.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:10












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Sure. Written out fully $dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$ means $M_t - M_0 = int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s$ and so $langle M rangle_t = bigg langle int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s bigg rangle_t$. Now use bilinearity and symmetry of the quadratic variation since $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ for continuous local martingale $N,K$ and an adapted process $F$ such that $int F dN$ makes sense. Note that we don't get any cross terms between $X$ and $Y$ since $langle X,Y rangle =0$
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:22







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I've just seen the edit to your comment. It looks like you didn't know about the behaviour of the Ito integral with respect to the quadratic variation. This is an important property to keep in mind. In fact $int_0^t F_s dN_s$ is the unique process such that for all continuous local martingales $K_t$ we have $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ (and one can even use this observation to give an alternative construction of the Ito integral).
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:25







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Oh shoot, the $t$ in my comment should be a $cdot$, I just copy-pasted that expression and forgot to change it. The thing inside the covariation should always be a process and not a fixed random variable; that $cdot$ just means you consider the integral as a process and not the integral at any fixed time. You're completely right to point this out. Sorry for the source of confusion.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 1 at 15:40







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            It's nothing to do with that. Try applying Ito's lemma to both of them and then use the resulting formula to compute the covariation. Recall that $langle X,Y rangle = 0$ and that if $V_t$ is a finite variation process then $langle M,V rangle = 0$ for any semimartingale $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:08






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            In general, when you see a function of a continuous local martingale (/semimartingale) then you should almost immediately try seeing if applying Ito's lemma can help you.
            $endgroup$
            – Rhys Steele
            Apr 3 at 18:10







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Sure. Written out fully $dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$ means $M_t - M_0 = int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s$ and so $langle M rangle_t = bigg langle int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s bigg rangle_t$. Now use bilinearity and symmetry of the quadratic variation since $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ for continuous local martingale $N,K$ and an adapted process $F$ such that $int F dN$ makes sense. Note that we don't get any cross terms between $X$ and $Y$ since $langle X,Y rangle =0$
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 1 at 15:22





          $begingroup$
          Sure. Written out fully $dM_t = M_t dX_t - e^X_t sin(Y_t) dY_t$ means $M_t - M_0 = int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s$ and so $langle M rangle_t = bigg langle int_0^t M_s dX_s - int_0^t e^X_ssin(Y_s) dY_s bigg rangle_t$. Now use bilinearity and symmetry of the quadratic variation since $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ for continuous local martingale $N,K$ and an adapted process $F$ such that $int F dN$ makes sense. Note that we don't get any cross terms between $X$ and $Y$ since $langle X,Y rangle =0$
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 1 at 15:22





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I've just seen the edit to your comment. It looks like you didn't know about the behaviour of the Ito integral with respect to the quadratic variation. This is an important property to keep in mind. In fact $int_0^t F_s dN_s$ is the unique process such that for all continuous local martingales $K_t$ we have $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ (and one can even use this observation to give an alternative construction of the Ito integral).
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 1 at 15:25





          $begingroup$
          I've just seen the edit to your comment. It looks like you didn't know about the behaviour of the Ito integral with respect to the quadratic variation. This is an important property to keep in mind. In fact $int_0^t F_s dN_s$ is the unique process such that for all continuous local martingales $K_t$ we have $langle int_0^t F_s dN_s, K_s rangle_t = int_0^t F_s d langle N,K rangle_s$ (and one can even use this observation to give an alternative construction of the Ito integral).
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 1 at 15:25





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Oh shoot, the $t$ in my comment should be a $cdot$, I just copy-pasted that expression and forgot to change it. The thing inside the covariation should always be a process and not a fixed random variable; that $cdot$ just means you consider the integral as a process and not the integral at any fixed time. You're completely right to point this out. Sorry for the source of confusion.
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 1 at 15:40





          $begingroup$
          Oh shoot, the $t$ in my comment should be a $cdot$, I just copy-pasted that expression and forgot to change it. The thing inside the covariation should always be a process and not a fixed random variable; that $cdot$ just means you consider the integral as a process and not the integral at any fixed time. You're completely right to point this out. Sorry for the source of confusion.
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 1 at 15:40





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          It's nothing to do with that. Try applying Ito's lemma to both of them and then use the resulting formula to compute the covariation. Recall that $langle X,Y rangle = 0$ and that if $V_t$ is a finite variation process then $langle M,V rangle = 0$ for any semimartingale $M$.
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 3 at 18:08




          $begingroup$
          It's nothing to do with that. Try applying Ito's lemma to both of them and then use the resulting formula to compute the covariation. Recall that $langle X,Y rangle = 0$ and that if $V_t$ is a finite variation process then $langle M,V rangle = 0$ for any semimartingale $M$.
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 3 at 18:08




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          In general, when you see a function of a continuous local martingale (/semimartingale) then you should almost immediately try seeing if applying Ito's lemma can help you.
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 3 at 18:10




          $begingroup$
          In general, when you see a function of a continuous local martingale (/semimartingale) then you should almost immediately try seeing if applying Ito's lemma can help you.
          $endgroup$
          – Rhys Steele
          Apr 3 at 18:10

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3169450%2fshow-that-a-process-is-a-local-martingale%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

          Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O

          Serbia Índice Etimología Historia Geografía Entorno natural División administrativa Política Demografía Economía Cultura Deportes Véase también Notas Referencias Bibliografía Enlaces externos Menú de navegación44°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.46666666666744°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.466666666667U.S. Department of Commerce (2015)«Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2018»Kosovo-Metohija.Neutralna Srbija u NATO okruzenju.The SerbsTheories on the Origin of the Serbs.Serbia.Earls: Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases.Egeo y Balcanes.Kalemegdan.Southern Pannonia during the age of the Great Migrations.Culture in Serbia.History.The Serbian Origin of the Montenegrins.Nemanjics' period (1186-1353).Stefan Uros (1355-1371).Serbian medieval history.Habsburg–Ottoman Wars (1525–1718).The Ottoman Empire, 1700-1922.The First Serbian Uprising.Miloš, prince of Serbia.3. Bosnia-Hercegovina and the Congress of Berlin.The Balkan Wars and the Partition of Macedonia.The Falcon and the Eagle: Montenegro and Austria-Hungary, 1908-1914.Typhus fever on the eastern front in World War I.Anniversary of WWI battle marked in Serbia.La derrota austriaca en los Balcanes. Fin del Imperio Austro-Húngaro.Imperio austriaco y Reino de Hungría.Los tiempos modernos: del capitalismo a la globalización, siglos XVII al XXI.The period of Croatia within ex-Yugoslavia.Yugoslavia: Much in a Name.Las dictaduras europeas.Croacia: mito y realidad."Crods ask arms".Prólogo a la invasión.La campaña de los Balcanes.La resistencia en Yugoslavia.Jasenovac Research Institute.Día en memoria de las víctimas del genocidio en la Segunda Guerra Mundial.El infierno estuvo en Jasenovac.Croacia empieza a «desenterrar» a sus muertos de Jasenovac.World fascism: a historical encyclopedia, Volumen 1.Tito. Josip Broz.El nuevo orden y la resistencia.La conquista del poder.Algunos aspectos de la economía yugoslava a mediados de 1962.Albania-Kosovo crisis.De Kosovo a Kosova: una visión demográfica.La crisis de la economía yugoslava y la política de "estabilización".Milosevic: el poder de un absolutista."Serbia under Milošević: politics in the 1990s"Milosevic cavó en Kosovo la tumba de la antigua Yugoslavia.La ONU exculpa a Serbia de genocidio en la guerra de Bosnia.Slobodan Milosevic, el burócrata que supo usar el odio.Es la fuerza contra el sufrimiento de muchos inocentes.Matanza de civiles al bombardear la OTAN un puente mientras pasaba un tren.Las consecuencias negativas de los bombardeos de Yugoslavia se sentirán aún durante largo tiempo.Kostunica advierte que la misión de Europa en Kosovo es ilegal.Las 24 horas más largas en la vida de Slobodan Milosevic.Serbia declara la guerra a la mafia por matar a Djindjic.Tadic presentará "quizás en diciembre" la solicitud de entrada en la UE.Montenegro declara su independencia de Serbia.Serbia se declara estado soberano tras separación de Montenegro.«Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion)»Mladic pasa por el médico antes de la audiencia para extraditarloDatos de Serbia y Kosovo.The Carpathian Mountains.Position, Relief, Climate.Transport.Finding birds in Serbia.U Srbiji do 2010. godine 10% teritorije nacionalni parkovi.Geography.Serbia: Climate.Variability of Climate In Serbia In The Second Half of The 20thc Entury.BASIC CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE TERRITORY OF SERBIA.Fauna y flora: Serbia.Serbia and Montenegro.Información general sobre Serbia.Republic of Serbia Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA).Serbia recycling 15% of waste.Reform process of the Serbian energy sector.20-MW Wind Project Being Developed in Serbia.Las Naciones Unidas. Paz para Kosovo.Aniversario sin fiesta.Population by national or ethnic groups by Census 2002.Article 7. Coat of arms, flag and national anthem.Serbia, flag of.Historia.«Serbia and Montenegro in Pictures»Serbia.Serbia aprueba su nueva Constitución con un apoyo de más del 50%.Serbia. Population.«El nacionalista Nikolic gana las elecciones presidenciales en Serbia»El europeísta Borís Tadic gana la segunda vuelta de las presidenciales serbias.Aleksandar Vucic, de ultranacionalista serbio a fervoroso europeístaKostunica condena la declaración del "falso estado" de Kosovo.Comienza el debate sobre la independencia de Kosovo en el TIJ.La Corte Internacional de Justicia dice que Kosovo no violó el derecho internacional al declarar su independenciaKosovo: Enviado de la ONU advierte tensiones y fragilidad.«Bruselas recomienda negociar la adhesión de Serbia tras el acuerdo sobre Kosovo»Monografía de Serbia.Bez smanjivanja Vojske Srbije.Military statistics Serbia and Montenegro.Šutanovac: Vojni budžet za 2009. godinu 70 milijardi dinara.Serbia-Montenegro shortens obligatory military service to six months.No hay justicia para las víctimas de los bombardeos de la OTAN.Zapatero reitera la negativa de España a reconocer la independencia de Kosovo.Anniversary of the signing of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement.Detenido en Serbia Radovan Karadzic, el criminal de guerra más buscado de Europa."Serbia presentará su candidatura de acceso a la UE antes de fin de año".Serbia solicita la adhesión a la UE.Detenido el exgeneral serbobosnio Ratko Mladic, principal acusado del genocidio en los Balcanes«Lista de todos los Estados Miembros de las Naciones Unidas que son parte o signatarios en los diversos instrumentos de derechos humanos de las Naciones Unidas»versión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre la Eliminación de todas las Formas de Discriminación contra la MujerConvención contra la tortura y otros tratos o penas crueles, inhumanos o degradantesversión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con DiscapacidadEl ACNUR recibe con beneplácito el envío de tropas de la OTAN a Kosovo y se prepara ante una posible llegada de refugiados a Serbia.Kosovo.- El jefe de la Minuk denuncia que los serbios boicotearon las legislativas por 'presiones'.Bosnia and Herzegovina. Population.Datos básicos de Montenegro, historia y evolución política.Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa global de fecundidad (por 1000 habitantes).Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa bruta de mortalidad (por 1000 habitantes).Population.Falleció el patriarca de la Iglesia Ortodoxa serbia.Atacan en Kosovo autobuses con peregrinos tras la investidura del patriarca serbio IrinejSerbian in Hungary.Tasas de cambio."Kosovo es de todos sus ciudadanos".Report for Serbia.Country groups by income.GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA 1997–2007.Economic Trends in the Republic of Serbia 2006.National Accounts Statitics.Саопштења за јавност.GDP per inhabitant varied by one to six across the EU27 Member States.Un pacto de estabilidad para Serbia.Unemployment rate rises in Serbia.Serbia, Belarus agree free trade to woo investors.Serbia, Turkey call investors to Serbia.Success Stories.U.S. Private Investment in Serbia and Montenegro.Positive trend.Banks in Serbia.La Cámara de Comercio acompaña a empresas madrileñas a Serbia y Croacia.Serbia Industries.Energy and mining.Agriculture.Late crops, fruit and grapes output, 2008.Rebranding Serbia: A Hobby Shortly to Become a Full-Time Job.Final data on livestock statistics, 2008.Serbian cell-phone users.U Srbiji sve više računara.Телекомуникације.U Srbiji 27 odsto gradjana koristi Internet.Serbia and Montenegro.Тренд гледаности програма РТС-а у 2008. и 2009.години.Serbian railways.General Terms.El mercado del transporte aéreo en Serbia.Statistics.Vehículos de motor registrados.Planes ambiciosos para el transporte fluvial.Turismo.Turistički promet u Republici Srbiji u periodu januar-novembar 2007. godine.Your Guide to Culture.Novi Sad - city of culture.Nis - european crossroads.Serbia. Properties inscribed on the World Heritage List .Stari Ras and Sopoćani.Studenica Monastery.Medieval Monuments in Kosovo.Gamzigrad-Romuliana, Palace of Galerius.Skiing and snowboarding in Kopaonik.Tara.New7Wonders of Nature Finalists.Pilgrimage of Saint Sava.Exit Festival: Best european festival.Banje u Srbiji.«The Encyclopedia of world history»Culture.Centenario del arte serbio.«Djordje Andrejevic Kun: el único pintor de los brigadistas yugoslavos de la guerra civil española»About the museum.The collections.Miroslav Gospel – Manuscript from 1180.Historicity in the Serbo-Croatian Heroic Epic.Culture and Sport.Conversación con el rector del Seminario San Sava.'Reina Margot' funde drama, historia y gesto con música de Goran Bregovic.Serbia gana Eurovisión y España decepciona de nuevo con un vigésimo puesto.Home.Story.Emir Kusturica.Tercer oro para Paskaljevic.Nikola Tesla Year.Home.Tesla, un genio tomado por loco.Aniversario de la muerte de Nikola Tesla.El Museo Nikola Tesla en Belgrado.El inventor del mundo actual.República de Serbia.University of Belgrade official statistics.University of Novi Sad.University of Kragujevac.University of Nis.Comida. Cocina serbia.Cooking.Montenegro se convertirá en el miembro 204 del movimiento olímpico.España, campeona de Europa de baloncesto.El Partizan de Belgrado se corona campeón por octava vez consecutiva.Serbia se clasifica para el Mundial de 2010 de Sudáfrica.Serbia Name Squad For Northern Ireland And South Korea Tests.Fútbol.- El Partizán de Belgrado se proclama campeón de la Liga serbia.Clasificacion final Mundial de balonmano Croacia 2009.Serbia vence a España y se consagra campeón mundial de waterpolo.Novak Djokovic no convence pero gana en Australia.Gana Ana Ivanovic el Roland Garros.Serena Williams gana el US Open por tercera vez.Biography.Bradt Travel Guide SerbiaThe Encyclopedia of World War IGobierno de SerbiaPortal del Gobierno de SerbiaPresidencia de SerbiaAsamblea Nacional SerbiaMinisterio de Asuntos exteriores de SerbiaBanco Nacional de SerbiaAgencia Serbia para la Promoción de la Inversión y la ExportaciónOficina de Estadísticas de SerbiaCIA. Factbook 2008Organización nacional de turismo de SerbiaDiscover SerbiaConoce SerbiaNoticias de SerbiaSerbiaWorldCat1512028760000 0000 9526 67094054598-2n8519591900570825ge1309191004530741010url17413117006669D055771Serbia