Proof that the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular.Is simple straight-edge and compass construction a substantial proof?proof that the three interior angles of a triangle is congruent to a straight line (without measurements)The graph of a function $y(x)$ is a straight line in a regular coordinate system if and only if $y(x) = ax + b$?How to explain the perpendicularity of two lines to a High School student?Continuous functions, its inverse (if exists) and intersections graphicallyIs there more to explain why a hypothesis doesn't hold, rather than that it arrives at a contradiction?$frac1x$ and its inverse breaking a rule of inverse functions?Function graph - meet an even number of times each horizontal lineFind the maximum length of line of ST and At what value of x will ST be at it's longest?Prove that any point on the perpendicular bisector of a line segment is equidistant from the endpoints of the line segment.

Reverse dictionary where values are lists

Solving a recurrence relation (poker chips)

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

What does the expression "A Mann!" means

Plagiarism or not?

How did the Super Star Destroyer Executor get destroyed exactly?

Cursor Replacement for Newbies

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

What is a romance in Latin?

Do UK voters know if their MP will be the Speaker of the House?

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

Unlock My Phone! February 2018

Personal Teleportation: From Rags to Riches

How to Recreate this in LaTeX? (Unsure What the Notation is Called)

How do I handle a potential work/personal life conflict as the manager of one of my friends?

What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?

Arrow those variables!

Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for one more flight?

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

I would say: "You are another teacher", but she is a woman and I am a man

How does a predictive coding aid in lossless compression?



Proof that the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular.


Is simple straight-edge and compass construction a substantial proof?proof that the three interior angles of a triangle is congruent to a straight line (without measurements)The graph of a function $y(x)$ is a straight line in a regular coordinate system if and only if $y(x) = ax + b$?How to explain the perpendicularity of two lines to a High School student?Continuous functions, its inverse (if exists) and intersections graphicallyIs there more to explain why a hypothesis doesn't hold, rather than that it arrives at a contradiction?$frac1x$ and its inverse breaking a rule of inverse functions?Function graph - meet an even number of times each horizontal lineFind the maximum length of line of ST and At what value of x will ST be at it's longest?Prove that any point on the perpendicular bisector of a line segment is equidistant from the endpoints of the line segment.













1












$begingroup$


I am refreshing my high school maths and got an exercise to proof that the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular. Below is my proof.



  1. A linear function is a straight line.

  2. An inverse function is a reflection of the function of $x = y$ line. This means the function and its inverse must have the same angle when it meet, which is 45.

  3. From 2., $f(x)$ must be parallel with y axis and $f^-1(x)$ must be parallel with x axis (or vise-versa.)

  4. If $f(x)$ is parallel with $y$ axis, then it's not a function.

Is my proof correct? Are there any other ways of proving this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It looks fine; except you should state at the outset that you're assuming the two graphs are perpendicular.
    $endgroup$
    – David Mitra
    Jan 31 '15 at 15:32















1












$begingroup$


I am refreshing my high school maths and got an exercise to proof that the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular. Below is my proof.



  1. A linear function is a straight line.

  2. An inverse function is a reflection of the function of $x = y$ line. This means the function and its inverse must have the same angle when it meet, which is 45.

  3. From 2., $f(x)$ must be parallel with y axis and $f^-1(x)$ must be parallel with x axis (or vise-versa.)

  4. If $f(x)$ is parallel with $y$ axis, then it's not a function.

Is my proof correct? Are there any other ways of proving this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It looks fine; except you should state at the outset that you're assuming the two graphs are perpendicular.
    $endgroup$
    – David Mitra
    Jan 31 '15 at 15:32













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I am refreshing my high school maths and got an exercise to proof that the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular. Below is my proof.



  1. A linear function is a straight line.

  2. An inverse function is a reflection of the function of $x = y$ line. This means the function and its inverse must have the same angle when it meet, which is 45.

  3. From 2., $f(x)$ must be parallel with y axis and $f^-1(x)$ must be parallel with x axis (or vise-versa.)

  4. If $f(x)$ is parallel with $y$ axis, then it's not a function.

Is my proof correct? Are there any other ways of proving this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am refreshing my high school maths and got an exercise to proof that the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular. Below is my proof.



  1. A linear function is a straight line.

  2. An inverse function is a reflection of the function of $x = y$ line. This means the function and its inverse must have the same angle when it meet, which is 45.

  3. From 2., $f(x)$ must be parallel with y axis and $f^-1(x)$ must be parallel with x axis (or vise-versa.)

  4. If $f(x)$ is parallel with $y$ axis, then it's not a function.

Is my proof correct? Are there any other ways of proving this?







functions proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 31 '15 at 15:23









idonnoidonno

1,72282020




1,72282020







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It looks fine; except you should state at the outset that you're assuming the two graphs are perpendicular.
    $endgroup$
    – David Mitra
    Jan 31 '15 at 15:32












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It looks fine; except you should state at the outset that you're assuming the two graphs are perpendicular.
    $endgroup$
    – David Mitra
    Jan 31 '15 at 15:32







1




1




$begingroup$
It looks fine; except you should state at the outset that you're assuming the two graphs are perpendicular.
$endgroup$
– David Mitra
Jan 31 '15 at 15:32




$begingroup$
It looks fine; except you should state at the outset that you're assuming the two graphs are perpendicular.
$endgroup$
– David Mitra
Jan 31 '15 at 15:32










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The proof you give is more or less a sketch. It uses some not well-defined notions. A mathematical proof could run like this:



The linear function $f(x) = k x + d$ has direction vector $(1,k)$. The inverse $f^-1(x) = fracx-dk$ only exists for $k ne 0$ and has direction vector $(1,frac1k)$.



For the scalar product of the two direction vectors we get:



$(1,k) cdot (1,frac1k) = 1 + k frac1k = 1 + 1 = 2$



which is non-zero, therefore the graphs are not perpendicular.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    You are right. For clarity, you should explain were the $45°$ is coming from. Also beware that you should discuss the case of negative coefficients.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      If $f$ is a linear function, then $f(x) = ax + b$, with $a neq 0$. The graph of $f$ has slope $a$. Since $a neq 0$, the graph of $f$ is not horizontal. The graph of $f$ is not vertical since a function of $x$ has a unique $y$ value for each $x$ value.



      We solve the inverse by interchanging $x$ and $y$, then solving for $y$.
      beginalign*
      y & = ax + b\
      x & = ay + b && textinterchange variables\
      x - b & = ay\
      fracx - ba & = y && textdivision by $a neq 0$ is defined\
      frac1ax - fracba & = y
      endalign*
      Hence, the inverse of $f$ is
      $$g(x) = frac1ax - fracba$$
      which you can verify by showing that $(g circ f)(x) = x$ and $(f circ g)(x) = x$ for each real number $x$. The product of the slopes of the graphs of $f$ and $g$ is
      $$a cdot frac1a = 1$$
      However, the product of the slopes of non-vertical perpendicular lines is $-1$. Hence, the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular.



      Note that if $a = 0$, then $f(x) = b$ is a constant function rather than a linear function. A constant function does not have an inverse since there is more than one value of $x$ for each value of $y$. If a function does have an inverse, then a horizontal line will cross its graph at most once (so we can write $x$ as a function of $y$), which is known as the Horizontal Line Test. A constant function fails the Horizontal Line Test.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1127781%2fproof-that-the-graph-of-a-linear-function-and-its-inverse-cannot-be-perpendicula%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        1












        $begingroup$

        The proof you give is more or less a sketch. It uses some not well-defined notions. A mathematical proof could run like this:



        The linear function $f(x) = k x + d$ has direction vector $(1,k)$. The inverse $f^-1(x) = fracx-dk$ only exists for $k ne 0$ and has direction vector $(1,frac1k)$.



        For the scalar product of the two direction vectors we get:



        $(1,k) cdot (1,frac1k) = 1 + k frac1k = 1 + 1 = 2$



        which is non-zero, therefore the graphs are not perpendicular.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          1












          $begingroup$

          The proof you give is more or less a sketch. It uses some not well-defined notions. A mathematical proof could run like this:



          The linear function $f(x) = k x + d$ has direction vector $(1,k)$. The inverse $f^-1(x) = fracx-dk$ only exists for $k ne 0$ and has direction vector $(1,frac1k)$.



          For the scalar product of the two direction vectors we get:



          $(1,k) cdot (1,frac1k) = 1 + k frac1k = 1 + 1 = 2$



          which is non-zero, therefore the graphs are not perpendicular.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            The proof you give is more or less a sketch. It uses some not well-defined notions. A mathematical proof could run like this:



            The linear function $f(x) = k x + d$ has direction vector $(1,k)$. The inverse $f^-1(x) = fracx-dk$ only exists for $k ne 0$ and has direction vector $(1,frac1k)$.



            For the scalar product of the two direction vectors we get:



            $(1,k) cdot (1,frac1k) = 1 + k frac1k = 1 + 1 = 2$



            which is non-zero, therefore the graphs are not perpendicular.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The proof you give is more or less a sketch. It uses some not well-defined notions. A mathematical proof could run like this:



            The linear function $f(x) = k x + d$ has direction vector $(1,k)$. The inverse $f^-1(x) = fracx-dk$ only exists for $k ne 0$ and has direction vector $(1,frac1k)$.



            For the scalar product of the two direction vectors we get:



            $(1,k) cdot (1,frac1k) = 1 + k frac1k = 1 + 1 = 2$



            which is non-zero, therefore the graphs are not perpendicular.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 31 '15 at 15:37









            coproccoproc

            977514




            977514





















                0












                $begingroup$

                You are right. For clarity, you should explain were the $45°$ is coming from. Also beware that you should discuss the case of negative coefficients.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  You are right. For clarity, you should explain were the $45°$ is coming from. Also beware that you should discuss the case of negative coefficients.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    You are right. For clarity, you should explain were the $45°$ is coming from. Also beware that you should discuss the case of negative coefficients.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    You are right. For clarity, you should explain were the $45°$ is coming from. Also beware that you should discuss the case of negative coefficients.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 31 '15 at 15:32









                    Yves DaoustYves Daoust

                    132k676229




                    132k676229





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        If $f$ is a linear function, then $f(x) = ax + b$, with $a neq 0$. The graph of $f$ has slope $a$. Since $a neq 0$, the graph of $f$ is not horizontal. The graph of $f$ is not vertical since a function of $x$ has a unique $y$ value for each $x$ value.



                        We solve the inverse by interchanging $x$ and $y$, then solving for $y$.
                        beginalign*
                        y & = ax + b\
                        x & = ay + b && textinterchange variables\
                        x - b & = ay\
                        fracx - ba & = y && textdivision by $a neq 0$ is defined\
                        frac1ax - fracba & = y
                        endalign*
                        Hence, the inverse of $f$ is
                        $$g(x) = frac1ax - fracba$$
                        which you can verify by showing that $(g circ f)(x) = x$ and $(f circ g)(x) = x$ for each real number $x$. The product of the slopes of the graphs of $f$ and $g$ is
                        $$a cdot frac1a = 1$$
                        However, the product of the slopes of non-vertical perpendicular lines is $-1$. Hence, the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular.



                        Note that if $a = 0$, then $f(x) = b$ is a constant function rather than a linear function. A constant function does not have an inverse since there is more than one value of $x$ for each value of $y$. If a function does have an inverse, then a horizontal line will cross its graph at most once (so we can write $x$ as a function of $y$), which is known as the Horizontal Line Test. A constant function fails the Horizontal Line Test.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          If $f$ is a linear function, then $f(x) = ax + b$, with $a neq 0$. The graph of $f$ has slope $a$. Since $a neq 0$, the graph of $f$ is not horizontal. The graph of $f$ is not vertical since a function of $x$ has a unique $y$ value for each $x$ value.



                          We solve the inverse by interchanging $x$ and $y$, then solving for $y$.
                          beginalign*
                          y & = ax + b\
                          x & = ay + b && textinterchange variables\
                          x - b & = ay\
                          fracx - ba & = y && textdivision by $a neq 0$ is defined\
                          frac1ax - fracba & = y
                          endalign*
                          Hence, the inverse of $f$ is
                          $$g(x) = frac1ax - fracba$$
                          which you can verify by showing that $(g circ f)(x) = x$ and $(f circ g)(x) = x$ for each real number $x$. The product of the slopes of the graphs of $f$ and $g$ is
                          $$a cdot frac1a = 1$$
                          However, the product of the slopes of non-vertical perpendicular lines is $-1$. Hence, the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular.



                          Note that if $a = 0$, then $f(x) = b$ is a constant function rather than a linear function. A constant function does not have an inverse since there is more than one value of $x$ for each value of $y$. If a function does have an inverse, then a horizontal line will cross its graph at most once (so we can write $x$ as a function of $y$), which is known as the Horizontal Line Test. A constant function fails the Horizontal Line Test.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            If $f$ is a linear function, then $f(x) = ax + b$, with $a neq 0$. The graph of $f$ has slope $a$. Since $a neq 0$, the graph of $f$ is not horizontal. The graph of $f$ is not vertical since a function of $x$ has a unique $y$ value for each $x$ value.



                            We solve the inverse by interchanging $x$ and $y$, then solving for $y$.
                            beginalign*
                            y & = ax + b\
                            x & = ay + b && textinterchange variables\
                            x - b & = ay\
                            fracx - ba & = y && textdivision by $a neq 0$ is defined\
                            frac1ax - fracba & = y
                            endalign*
                            Hence, the inverse of $f$ is
                            $$g(x) = frac1ax - fracba$$
                            which you can verify by showing that $(g circ f)(x) = x$ and $(f circ g)(x) = x$ for each real number $x$. The product of the slopes of the graphs of $f$ and $g$ is
                            $$a cdot frac1a = 1$$
                            However, the product of the slopes of non-vertical perpendicular lines is $-1$. Hence, the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular.



                            Note that if $a = 0$, then $f(x) = b$ is a constant function rather than a linear function. A constant function does not have an inverse since there is more than one value of $x$ for each value of $y$. If a function does have an inverse, then a horizontal line will cross its graph at most once (so we can write $x$ as a function of $y$), which is known as the Horizontal Line Test. A constant function fails the Horizontal Line Test.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            If $f$ is a linear function, then $f(x) = ax + b$, with $a neq 0$. The graph of $f$ has slope $a$. Since $a neq 0$, the graph of $f$ is not horizontal. The graph of $f$ is not vertical since a function of $x$ has a unique $y$ value for each $x$ value.



                            We solve the inverse by interchanging $x$ and $y$, then solving for $y$.
                            beginalign*
                            y & = ax + b\
                            x & = ay + b && textinterchange variables\
                            x - b & = ay\
                            fracx - ba & = y && textdivision by $a neq 0$ is defined\
                            frac1ax - fracba & = y
                            endalign*
                            Hence, the inverse of $f$ is
                            $$g(x) = frac1ax - fracba$$
                            which you can verify by showing that $(g circ f)(x) = x$ and $(f circ g)(x) = x$ for each real number $x$. The product of the slopes of the graphs of $f$ and $g$ is
                            $$a cdot frac1a = 1$$
                            However, the product of the slopes of non-vertical perpendicular lines is $-1$. Hence, the graph of a linear function and its inverse cannot be perpendicular.



                            Note that if $a = 0$, then $f(x) = b$ is a constant function rather than a linear function. A constant function does not have an inverse since there is more than one value of $x$ for each value of $y$. If a function does have an inverse, then a horizontal line will cross its graph at most once (so we can write $x$ as a function of $y$), which is known as the Horizontal Line Test. A constant function fails the Horizontal Line Test.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 31 '15 at 18:27









                            N. F. TaussigN. F. Taussig

                            45k103358




                            45k103358



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1127781%2fproof-that-the-graph-of-a-linear-function-and-its-inverse-cannot-be-perpendicula%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Boston (Lincolnshire) Stedsbyld | Berne yn Boston | NavigaasjemenuBoston Borough CouncilBoston, Lincolnshire

                                Ballerup Komuun Stääden an saarpen | Futnuuten | Luke uk diar | Nawigatsjuunwww.ballerup.dkwww.statistikbanken.dk: Tabelle BEF44 (Folketal pr. 1. januar fordelt på byer)Commonskategorii: Ballerup Komuun55° 44′ N, 12° 22′ O

                                Serbia Índice Etimología Historia Geografía Entorno natural División administrativa Política Demografía Economía Cultura Deportes Véase también Notas Referencias Bibliografía Enlaces externos Menú de navegación44°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.46666666666744°49′00″N 20°28′00″E / 44.816666666667, 20.466666666667U.S. Department of Commerce (2015)«Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2018»Kosovo-Metohija.Neutralna Srbija u NATO okruzenju.The SerbsTheories on the Origin of the Serbs.Serbia.Earls: Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases.Egeo y Balcanes.Kalemegdan.Southern Pannonia during the age of the Great Migrations.Culture in Serbia.History.The Serbian Origin of the Montenegrins.Nemanjics' period (1186-1353).Stefan Uros (1355-1371).Serbian medieval history.Habsburg–Ottoman Wars (1525–1718).The Ottoman Empire, 1700-1922.The First Serbian Uprising.Miloš, prince of Serbia.3. Bosnia-Hercegovina and the Congress of Berlin.The Balkan Wars and the Partition of Macedonia.The Falcon and the Eagle: Montenegro and Austria-Hungary, 1908-1914.Typhus fever on the eastern front in World War I.Anniversary of WWI battle marked in Serbia.La derrota austriaca en los Balcanes. Fin del Imperio Austro-Húngaro.Imperio austriaco y Reino de Hungría.Los tiempos modernos: del capitalismo a la globalización, siglos XVII al XXI.The period of Croatia within ex-Yugoslavia.Yugoslavia: Much in a Name.Las dictaduras europeas.Croacia: mito y realidad."Crods ask arms".Prólogo a la invasión.La campaña de los Balcanes.La resistencia en Yugoslavia.Jasenovac Research Institute.Día en memoria de las víctimas del genocidio en la Segunda Guerra Mundial.El infierno estuvo en Jasenovac.Croacia empieza a «desenterrar» a sus muertos de Jasenovac.World fascism: a historical encyclopedia, Volumen 1.Tito. Josip Broz.El nuevo orden y la resistencia.La conquista del poder.Algunos aspectos de la economía yugoslava a mediados de 1962.Albania-Kosovo crisis.De Kosovo a Kosova: una visión demográfica.La crisis de la economía yugoslava y la política de "estabilización".Milosevic: el poder de un absolutista."Serbia under Milošević: politics in the 1990s"Milosevic cavó en Kosovo la tumba de la antigua Yugoslavia.La ONU exculpa a Serbia de genocidio en la guerra de Bosnia.Slobodan Milosevic, el burócrata que supo usar el odio.Es la fuerza contra el sufrimiento de muchos inocentes.Matanza de civiles al bombardear la OTAN un puente mientras pasaba un tren.Las consecuencias negativas de los bombardeos de Yugoslavia se sentirán aún durante largo tiempo.Kostunica advierte que la misión de Europa en Kosovo es ilegal.Las 24 horas más largas en la vida de Slobodan Milosevic.Serbia declara la guerra a la mafia por matar a Djindjic.Tadic presentará "quizás en diciembre" la solicitud de entrada en la UE.Montenegro declara su independencia de Serbia.Serbia se declara estado soberano tras separación de Montenegro.«Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion)»Mladic pasa por el médico antes de la audiencia para extraditarloDatos de Serbia y Kosovo.The Carpathian Mountains.Position, Relief, Climate.Transport.Finding birds in Serbia.U Srbiji do 2010. godine 10% teritorije nacionalni parkovi.Geography.Serbia: Climate.Variability of Climate In Serbia In The Second Half of The 20thc Entury.BASIC CLIMATE CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE TERRITORY OF SERBIA.Fauna y flora: Serbia.Serbia and Montenegro.Información general sobre Serbia.Republic of Serbia Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA).Serbia recycling 15% of waste.Reform process of the Serbian energy sector.20-MW Wind Project Being Developed in Serbia.Las Naciones Unidas. Paz para Kosovo.Aniversario sin fiesta.Population by national or ethnic groups by Census 2002.Article 7. Coat of arms, flag and national anthem.Serbia, flag of.Historia.«Serbia and Montenegro in Pictures»Serbia.Serbia aprueba su nueva Constitución con un apoyo de más del 50%.Serbia. Population.«El nacionalista Nikolic gana las elecciones presidenciales en Serbia»El europeísta Borís Tadic gana la segunda vuelta de las presidenciales serbias.Aleksandar Vucic, de ultranacionalista serbio a fervoroso europeístaKostunica condena la declaración del "falso estado" de Kosovo.Comienza el debate sobre la independencia de Kosovo en el TIJ.La Corte Internacional de Justicia dice que Kosovo no violó el derecho internacional al declarar su independenciaKosovo: Enviado de la ONU advierte tensiones y fragilidad.«Bruselas recomienda negociar la adhesión de Serbia tras el acuerdo sobre Kosovo»Monografía de Serbia.Bez smanjivanja Vojske Srbije.Military statistics Serbia and Montenegro.Šutanovac: Vojni budžet za 2009. godinu 70 milijardi dinara.Serbia-Montenegro shortens obligatory military service to six months.No hay justicia para las víctimas de los bombardeos de la OTAN.Zapatero reitera la negativa de España a reconocer la independencia de Kosovo.Anniversary of the signing of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement.Detenido en Serbia Radovan Karadzic, el criminal de guerra más buscado de Europa."Serbia presentará su candidatura de acceso a la UE antes de fin de año".Serbia solicita la adhesión a la UE.Detenido el exgeneral serbobosnio Ratko Mladic, principal acusado del genocidio en los Balcanes«Lista de todos los Estados Miembros de las Naciones Unidas que son parte o signatarios en los diversos instrumentos de derechos humanos de las Naciones Unidas»versión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre la Eliminación de todas las Formas de Discriminación contra la MujerConvención contra la tortura y otros tratos o penas crueles, inhumanos o degradantesversión pdfProtocolo Facultativo de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con DiscapacidadEl ACNUR recibe con beneplácito el envío de tropas de la OTAN a Kosovo y se prepara ante una posible llegada de refugiados a Serbia.Kosovo.- El jefe de la Minuk denuncia que los serbios boicotearon las legislativas por 'presiones'.Bosnia and Herzegovina. Population.Datos básicos de Montenegro, historia y evolución política.Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa global de fecundidad (por 1000 habitantes).Serbia y Montenegro. Indicador: Tasa bruta de mortalidad (por 1000 habitantes).Population.Falleció el patriarca de la Iglesia Ortodoxa serbia.Atacan en Kosovo autobuses con peregrinos tras la investidura del patriarca serbio IrinejSerbian in Hungary.Tasas de cambio."Kosovo es de todos sus ciudadanos".Report for Serbia.Country groups by income.GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP) OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA 1997–2007.Economic Trends in the Republic of Serbia 2006.National Accounts Statitics.Саопштења за јавност.GDP per inhabitant varied by one to six across the EU27 Member States.Un pacto de estabilidad para Serbia.Unemployment rate rises in Serbia.Serbia, Belarus agree free trade to woo investors.Serbia, Turkey call investors to Serbia.Success Stories.U.S. Private Investment in Serbia and Montenegro.Positive trend.Banks in Serbia.La Cámara de Comercio acompaña a empresas madrileñas a Serbia y Croacia.Serbia Industries.Energy and mining.Agriculture.Late crops, fruit and grapes output, 2008.Rebranding Serbia: A Hobby Shortly to Become a Full-Time Job.Final data on livestock statistics, 2008.Serbian cell-phone users.U Srbiji sve više računara.Телекомуникације.U Srbiji 27 odsto gradjana koristi Internet.Serbia and Montenegro.Тренд гледаности програма РТС-а у 2008. и 2009.години.Serbian railways.General Terms.El mercado del transporte aéreo en Serbia.Statistics.Vehículos de motor registrados.Planes ambiciosos para el transporte fluvial.Turismo.Turistički promet u Republici Srbiji u periodu januar-novembar 2007. godine.Your Guide to Culture.Novi Sad - city of culture.Nis - european crossroads.Serbia. Properties inscribed on the World Heritage List .Stari Ras and Sopoćani.Studenica Monastery.Medieval Monuments in Kosovo.Gamzigrad-Romuliana, Palace of Galerius.Skiing and snowboarding in Kopaonik.Tara.New7Wonders of Nature Finalists.Pilgrimage of Saint Sava.Exit Festival: Best european festival.Banje u Srbiji.«The Encyclopedia of world history»Culture.Centenario del arte serbio.«Djordje Andrejevic Kun: el único pintor de los brigadistas yugoslavos de la guerra civil española»About the museum.The collections.Miroslav Gospel – Manuscript from 1180.Historicity in the Serbo-Croatian Heroic Epic.Culture and Sport.Conversación con el rector del Seminario San Sava.'Reina Margot' funde drama, historia y gesto con música de Goran Bregovic.Serbia gana Eurovisión y España decepciona de nuevo con un vigésimo puesto.Home.Story.Emir Kusturica.Tercer oro para Paskaljevic.Nikola Tesla Year.Home.Tesla, un genio tomado por loco.Aniversario de la muerte de Nikola Tesla.El Museo Nikola Tesla en Belgrado.El inventor del mundo actual.República de Serbia.University of Belgrade official statistics.University of Novi Sad.University of Kragujevac.University of Nis.Comida. Cocina serbia.Cooking.Montenegro se convertirá en el miembro 204 del movimiento olímpico.España, campeona de Europa de baloncesto.El Partizan de Belgrado se corona campeón por octava vez consecutiva.Serbia se clasifica para el Mundial de 2010 de Sudáfrica.Serbia Name Squad For Northern Ireland And South Korea Tests.Fútbol.- El Partizán de Belgrado se proclama campeón de la Liga serbia.Clasificacion final Mundial de balonmano Croacia 2009.Serbia vence a España y se consagra campeón mundial de waterpolo.Novak Djokovic no convence pero gana en Australia.Gana Ana Ivanovic el Roland Garros.Serena Williams gana el US Open por tercera vez.Biography.Bradt Travel Guide SerbiaThe Encyclopedia of World War IGobierno de SerbiaPortal del Gobierno de SerbiaPresidencia de SerbiaAsamblea Nacional SerbiaMinisterio de Asuntos exteriores de SerbiaBanco Nacional de SerbiaAgencia Serbia para la Promoción de la Inversión y la ExportaciónOficina de Estadísticas de SerbiaCIA. Factbook 2008Organización nacional de turismo de SerbiaDiscover SerbiaConoce SerbiaNoticias de SerbiaSerbiaWorldCat1512028760000 0000 9526 67094054598-2n8519591900570825ge1309191004530741010url17413117006669D055771Serbia